Ontological Grounds of International Law

IF 0.6 Wisdom Pub Date : 2023-03-25 DOI:10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.983
G. Aznagulova, D. Pashentsev
{"title":"Ontological Grounds of International Law","authors":"G. Aznagulova, D. Pashentsev","doi":"10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International law being a complexly structured, hierarchically organized and multi-aspect political and legal phenomenon has dialectical interconnection with universal material and spiritual culture, its past, functioning and development trends and it has human existence as its deep sensational basis, which represents centuries-old civilized togetherness of peoples and nations between them and has specific significance in a specific historical era. Therefore from the cognitive-aware and subject-essential viewpoints international law shall be treated as a form of international relationships, covered by law – i.e. international relationships are the object of regulation of international law and should be considered as a dynamic phenomenon or a consecutive process which represents universal motion principle when its certain status.\nInternational law is a dialectical process of a single causal chain of social phenomena which spreads through time and space. The main feature of implementing its basic principles (defined ontologically as universal) relates legally to the field of “oughtness” as a moral onus of subjective will of sovereign states. It is principally difficult to establish fair international relationships upon observance of interests of international relationships subjects as it is impossible to develop a uniform and extensive scale of moral values that are common for all states.","PeriodicalId":41633,"journal":{"name":"Wisdom","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisdom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International law being a complexly structured, hierarchically organized and multi-aspect political and legal phenomenon has dialectical interconnection with universal material and spiritual culture, its past, functioning and development trends and it has human existence as its deep sensational basis, which represents centuries-old civilized togetherness of peoples and nations between them and has specific significance in a specific historical era. Therefore from the cognitive-aware and subject-essential viewpoints international law shall be treated as a form of international relationships, covered by law – i.e. international relationships are the object of regulation of international law and should be considered as a dynamic phenomenon or a consecutive process which represents universal motion principle when its certain status. International law is a dialectical process of a single causal chain of social phenomena which spreads through time and space. The main feature of implementing its basic principles (defined ontologically as universal) relates legally to the field of “oughtness” as a moral onus of subjective will of sovereign states. It is principally difficult to establish fair international relationships upon observance of interests of international relationships subjects as it is impossible to develop a uniform and extensive scale of moral values that are common for all states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际法的本体论依据
国际法是一种结构复杂、层次化、多面向的政治法律现象,它与普遍的物质文化和精神文化及其历史、功能和发展趋势有着辩证的联系,它以人的存在为其深刻的感性基础,代表着各民族、各民族之间几百年的文明同一性,在特定的历史时代具有特定的意义。因此,从认知意识和主体本质的角度来看,国际法应被视为一种国际关系的形式,被法律所覆盖,即国际关系是国际法的调节对象,在其一定地位时应被视为一种动态现象或代表普遍运动原则的连续过程。国际法是跨越时间和空间的单一社会现象因果链的辩证过程。实施其基本原则(本体论上被定义为普遍原则)的主要特征在法律上与作为主权国家主观意志的道德责任的“应性”领域有关。在遵守国际关系主体利益的基础上建立公平的国际关系,主要是由于不可能形成一种统一的、广泛的、适用于所有国家的道德价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wisdom
Wisdom PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Court-Notary Interaction: Current Relationships in the Provision of Evidence Three Philosophical Pillars of the 2022 Armenian Constitutional Revision: Empowerment of Public Discourse, Theory of Justice, and Environmental Ethics Complex Regional Unification of Private International Law Rules on the Base of a Three-Part Structure: Political and Legal Framework Shareholders’ Agreement in the Crossroads of Philosophy of Law Methodology for the Study of the Principles of Establishing Territorial Jurisdiction and Mechanisms for Resolving Digital Disputes by the Courts of the International Financial Center of Dubai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1