Beyond Statistics

H. Yoo
{"title":"Beyond Statistics","authors":"H. Yoo","doi":"10.5765/jkacap.220010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistics based on measurable data protect us from the temptation of saying our intuition is true. However, they cannot sometimes reveal the truths hidden behind a phenomenon. Sometimes, data cannot be collected in the middle of an ongoing phenomenon. Many factors make the process hard, including practical difficulties in data collection, available measures, age of participants, various biases of data collection, and representativeness of the sample. For example, how can we measure the active changes in the brain of very young infants when they are developing basic social emotions, learning a language at the single word level, and consolidating secured attachment with their primary caregivers? How can we quantify ever-changing emotional reciprocity during the rapprochement period of 2-year-old toddlers and their parents? Even if we can capture a certain aspect of brain activities during the early developmental stage, a more robust story and context are attenuated within the data, and its implication in development might lose its depth. As another example, it has been more than 2 years since the COVID-19 pandemic started, and while some children are experiencing both physical and mental issues, others are not; statistics have not been able to capture or integrate what we experience and feel in everyday life. There has been a tremendous increase in cases of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, in the last four decades. Nonetheless, the statistics per se are insufficient to understand the situation without knowing the why behind the rapid increase, which is extremely hard to answer clearly. We know that children in Ukraine are facing tremendous crises in the face of war, and the data are unavailable and even powerless in such a rigorous existential reality. An in-depth understanding of typical developmental trajectories is an essential research area for atypical development and decoding psychopathology in child psychiatry. Studies have tried to prove the developmental process both in behavior and at the brain level. Many outstanding longitudinal studies examining developmental brain structure or connectivity changes have been published, with some examining brain changes associated with specific traits, such as reading, arithmetic ability, and preterm birth [1-3]. Prospective follow-up databases for brain development have been launched to set up more comprehensive insight into human brain development in an unbiased setting [4]. Various experimental models were developed and utilized to reproduce developmental processes in laboratory settings, from classic examples such as Ainsworth’s strange situation procedure to examine mother-child attachment patterns and false belief tasks to test the theory of mind to more complicated cognitive tasks. These might be researchers’ trials to make more abstract issues more concrete and transform further intersubjective phenomena into more visible, ubiquitous ones. With these attempts, we now know that children’s cortical thickness changes as they develop, and the maturation of specific brain areas vary depending on cognitive characteristics. In the current issue, there are two articles regarding synchronization in the process of separation-individuation (SSI) in adolescents in the context of treating an adolescent patient and representing the concept in a plot of a movie and a fairy tale. As with many concepts in the early developmental process, it is only an observable contemplation through work with patients or symbolic texts, including arts or literature, that reflect human experiences. These articles led me to think about the coordination of research through analyses of measurable data and logical analyses of the phenomenon observed during the active process of treating patients. The latter should be an essential driving force to develop more generalizable empirical research. Research in child psychiatry ultimately aims to understand children’s lives and improve them by acknowledging biological processes and their interaction with the environment. For example, we can set the next questions based on the contemplation of these articles, such as how to visualize SSI, how to prove that SSI is universal to a majority of families, which brain region contributes to the phenomenon the most, and how to follow up the longitudinal course of SSI from toddlerhood to adolescence. How can it be accomplished? Can digital technology combined with emotion sensors, emerging as a rapidly growing topic these days, shed light on measuring active, ongoing phenomena with minimal biases or bypassing labor-intensive laboratory work such This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Beyond Statistics","PeriodicalId":42806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"101 1","pages":"25 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.220010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistics based on measurable data protect us from the temptation of saying our intuition is true. However, they cannot sometimes reveal the truths hidden behind a phenomenon. Sometimes, data cannot be collected in the middle of an ongoing phenomenon. Many factors make the process hard, including practical difficulties in data collection, available measures, age of participants, various biases of data collection, and representativeness of the sample. For example, how can we measure the active changes in the brain of very young infants when they are developing basic social emotions, learning a language at the single word level, and consolidating secured attachment with their primary caregivers? How can we quantify ever-changing emotional reciprocity during the rapprochement period of 2-year-old toddlers and their parents? Even if we can capture a certain aspect of brain activities during the early developmental stage, a more robust story and context are attenuated within the data, and its implication in development might lose its depth. As another example, it has been more than 2 years since the COVID-19 pandemic started, and while some children are experiencing both physical and mental issues, others are not; statistics have not been able to capture or integrate what we experience and feel in everyday life. There has been a tremendous increase in cases of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, in the last four decades. Nonetheless, the statistics per se are insufficient to understand the situation without knowing the why behind the rapid increase, which is extremely hard to answer clearly. We know that children in Ukraine are facing tremendous crises in the face of war, and the data are unavailable and even powerless in such a rigorous existential reality. An in-depth understanding of typical developmental trajectories is an essential research area for atypical development and decoding psychopathology in child psychiatry. Studies have tried to prove the developmental process both in behavior and at the brain level. Many outstanding longitudinal studies examining developmental brain structure or connectivity changes have been published, with some examining brain changes associated with specific traits, such as reading, arithmetic ability, and preterm birth [1-3]. Prospective follow-up databases for brain development have been launched to set up more comprehensive insight into human brain development in an unbiased setting [4]. Various experimental models were developed and utilized to reproduce developmental processes in laboratory settings, from classic examples such as Ainsworth’s strange situation procedure to examine mother-child attachment patterns and false belief tasks to test the theory of mind to more complicated cognitive tasks. These might be researchers’ trials to make more abstract issues more concrete and transform further intersubjective phenomena into more visible, ubiquitous ones. With these attempts, we now know that children’s cortical thickness changes as they develop, and the maturation of specific brain areas vary depending on cognitive characteristics. In the current issue, there are two articles regarding synchronization in the process of separation-individuation (SSI) in adolescents in the context of treating an adolescent patient and representing the concept in a plot of a movie and a fairy tale. As with many concepts in the early developmental process, it is only an observable contemplation through work with patients or symbolic texts, including arts or literature, that reflect human experiences. These articles led me to think about the coordination of research through analyses of measurable data and logical analyses of the phenomenon observed during the active process of treating patients. The latter should be an essential driving force to develop more generalizable empirical research. Research in child psychiatry ultimately aims to understand children’s lives and improve them by acknowledging biological processes and their interaction with the environment. For example, we can set the next questions based on the contemplation of these articles, such as how to visualize SSI, how to prove that SSI is universal to a majority of families, which brain region contributes to the phenomenon the most, and how to follow up the longitudinal course of SSI from toddlerhood to adolescence. How can it be accomplished? Can digital technology combined with emotion sensors, emerging as a rapidly growing topic these days, shed light on measuring active, ongoing phenomena with minimal biases or bypassing labor-intensive laboratory work such This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Beyond Statistics
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除了统计
基于可测量数据的统计数据保护我们免受说直觉是正确的诱惑。然而,它们有时无法揭示隐藏在现象背后的真相。有时,在正在进行的现象中无法收集数据。许多因素使这一过程变得困难,包括数据收集的实际困难、可用的措施、参与者的年龄、数据收集的各种偏差和样本的代表性。例如,当非常年幼的婴儿正在发展基本的社会情感、学习单个单词水平的语言、巩固与主要照顾者的安全依恋关系时,我们如何测量他们大脑中的活跃变化?我们如何量化两岁幼童和父母之间不断变化的情感互惠?即使我们能够在早期发育阶段捕捉到大脑活动的某些方面,在数据中也会减弱更强大的故事和背景,其在发展中的含义可能会失去其深度。另一个例子是,自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来已经两年多了,虽然有些儿童出现了身体和精神问题,但有些儿童没有;统计数据无法捕捉或整合我们在日常生活中的经历和感受。在过去的四十年里,包括自闭症谱系障碍在内的神经发育障碍病例急剧增加。然而,如果不知道快速增长背后的原因,统计数据本身不足以理解情况,这很难回答清楚。我们知道,面对战争,乌克兰的儿童正面临着巨大的危机,而在如此严峻的生存现实中,这些数据是不可获得的,甚至是无能为力的。深入了解典型的发展轨迹是非典型发展和解码儿童精神病学精神病理学的重要研究领域。研究试图在行为和大脑层面上证明这一发展过程。已经发表了许多杰出的关于大脑结构发育或连通性变化的纵向研究,其中一些研究了与特定特征相关的大脑变化,如阅读、算术能力和早产[1-3]。脑发育的前瞻性随访数据库已经启动,以便在无偏倚的环境下更全面地了解人类大脑发育[4]。各种各样的实验模型被开发出来并用于在实验室环境中再现发展过程,从经典的例子,如安斯沃思的奇怪情况程序来检查母子依恋模式和错误信念任务来测试心理理论到更复杂的认知任务。这些可能是研究人员试图将更抽象的问题变得更具体,并将进一步的主体间现象转化为更可见、更普遍的现象。通过这些尝试,我们现在知道儿童的皮质厚度随着他们的发育而变化,特定大脑区域的成熟取决于认知特征。本期有两篇关于青少年分离-个性化(SSI)过程中的同步的文章,以治疗青少年患者和代表电影和童话故事情节中的概念为背景。与早期发展过程中的许多概念一样,它只是通过与患者合作或象征性文本(包括艺术或文学)反映人类经验的可观察的沉思。这些文章让我思考如何通过对可测量数据的分析和对治疗患者的积极过程中观察到的现象进行逻辑分析来协调研究。后者应该成为发展更普遍的实证研究的重要推动力。儿童精神病学研究的最终目的是了解儿童的生活,并通过承认生物过程及其与环境的相互作用来改善儿童的生活。例如,我们可以在思考这些文章的基础上设置下一个问题,例如如何将SSI形式化,如何证明SSI在大多数家庭中是普遍的,哪个大脑区域对这种现象的贡献最大,以及如何跟进SSI从幼儿期到青春期的纵向过程。怎样才能做到呢?数字技术与情感传感器相结合,作为一个快速发展的话题,这些天,在测量活跃的,正在进行的现象,以最小的偏见或绕过劳动密集型的实验室工作,这是一篇开放获取的文章,在知识共享署名非商业许可(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0)的条款下分发,允许无限制的非商业使用,分发,并在任何媒介上复制。只要正确引用原文。除了统计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Neurocognitive Profiles of Early Adulthood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. A Review and an Update on Pharmacological Treatment of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Association Between Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Exposure and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Emerging Breakthroughs in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment. Emotional Abuse to Delinquent Tendencies: Comparative Study on Juveniles and Students in Punjab, Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1