Martha Nussbaum and Aristotle on Distributive Justice and Equality

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS POLIS Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340379
M. Knoll
{"title":"Martha Nussbaum and Aristotle on Distributive Justice and Equality","authors":"M. Knoll","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article gives a detailed analysis of Nussbaum’s ‘capabilities approach’ and her claim that it is a genuinely Aristotelian contemporary po-litical philosophy. The paper examines how Nussbaum bases her ‘capabilities approach’ on human nature and questions her assertion that both Aristotle’s account of human nature and her own approach are not metaphysical. In order to analyze the normative dimension of Nussbaum’s ‘capabilities approach’, this article focuses on Aristotle’s doctrine of distributive justice and equality. It shows how Nussbaum adopts and modifies this doctrine in an egalitarian way and demonstrates that her reading and appropriation of it is problematic. With reference to contemporary literature on Aristotle’s Politics, the article criticizes how Nussbaum assimilates Aristotle’s political philosophy into modern values and notions, laying out six primary reasons supporting the thesis that Nussbaum’s ‘capabilities approach’ cannot be regarded as an Aristotelian one.","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article gives a detailed analysis of Nussbaum’s ‘capabilities approach’ and her claim that it is a genuinely Aristotelian contemporary po-litical philosophy. The paper examines how Nussbaum bases her ‘capabilities approach’ on human nature and questions her assertion that both Aristotle’s account of human nature and her own approach are not metaphysical. In order to analyze the normative dimension of Nussbaum’s ‘capabilities approach’, this article focuses on Aristotle’s doctrine of distributive justice and equality. It shows how Nussbaum adopts and modifies this doctrine in an egalitarian way and demonstrates that her reading and appropriation of it is problematic. With reference to contemporary literature on Aristotle’s Politics, the article criticizes how Nussbaum assimilates Aristotle’s political philosophy into modern values and notions, laying out six primary reasons supporting the thesis that Nussbaum’s ‘capabilities approach’ cannot be regarded as an Aristotelian one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玛莎·努斯鲍姆与亚里士多德论分配正义与平等
本文详细分析了努斯鲍姆的“能力方法”,以及她声称这是一种真正的亚里士多德式当代政治哲学。本文考察了努斯鲍姆如何将她的“能力方法”建立在人性的基础上,并质疑她的断言,即亚里士多德对人性的描述和她自己的方法都不是形而上学的。为了分析努斯鲍姆的“能力方法”的规范维度,本文主要关注亚里士多德的分配正义和平等学说。它展示了努斯鲍姆如何以一种平等主义的方式采纳和修改这一理论,并证明了她对这一理论的解读和挪用是有问题的。本文结合当代关于亚里士多德政治学的文献,批判了努斯鲍姆是如何将亚里士多德的政治哲学融入现代价值观和观念的,并提出了六个主要理由来支持努斯鲍姆的“能力方法”不能被视为亚里士多德的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Partnership in Book II of the Republic Socratic Contempt for Wealth in Plato’s Republic Praxis as Property: the Concept of Justice in Plato’s Republic Political Performativity in Performance Culture: Xenophon’s Hipparchikos and the Dithyrambic Chorus The King’s House or the Tyrant’s Palace? Rethinking Persia in Herodotus’s History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1