Southern Europe and the Eurozone Crisis Negotiations: Preference Formation and Contested Issues

IF 3.7 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE South European Society and Politics Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13608746.2019.1603697
Leonardo Morlino, Cecilia Emma Sottilotta
{"title":"Southern Europe and the Eurozone Crisis Negotiations: Preference Formation and Contested Issues","authors":"Leonardo Morlino, Cecilia Emma Sottilotta","doi":"10.1080/13608746.2019.1603697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT South European countries were severely hit by the eurozone crisis. Adopting the theoretical framework of prospect theory, this article conducts an empirical analysis of the interpretation of the situation by the South European political leaders in terms of gains and losses. After discussing the stances of South European countries vis-à-vis a number of contested issues which emerged during the 2010–2013 negotiations, the article goes on to provide a comparative account of the determinants of national preference formation with respect to the eurozone crisis reforms in Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal and Spain, paying special attention to the relationship between governments and parliaments.","PeriodicalId":47304,"journal":{"name":"South European Society and Politics","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South European Society and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2019.1603697","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT South European countries were severely hit by the eurozone crisis. Adopting the theoretical framework of prospect theory, this article conducts an empirical analysis of the interpretation of the situation by the South European political leaders in terms of gains and losses. After discussing the stances of South European countries vis-à-vis a number of contested issues which emerged during the 2010–2013 negotiations, the article goes on to provide a comparative account of the determinants of national preference formation with respect to the eurozone crisis reforms in Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal and Spain, paying special attention to the relationship between governments and parliaments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南欧与欧元区危机谈判:偏好形成与争议问题
南欧国家受到欧元区危机的严重打击。本文采用前景理论的理论框架,从得失两方面实证分析了南欧政治领导人对形势的解读。在讨论了南欧国家对-à-vis在2010-2013年谈判期间出现的一些有争议的问题的立场之后,本文继续提供关于塞浦路斯,希腊,意大利,马耳他,葡萄牙和西班牙的欧元区危机改革的国家偏好形成的决定因素的比较说明,特别关注政府和议会之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
21.20%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: A leading point of reference for scholars of Southern Europe, South European Society and Politics promotes both comparative and inter-disciplinary analyses, as well as offering innovative single county and sub-national studies. The journal acts as a forum for social, economic, cultural, contemporary historical and political approaches to research on the region, and is particularly keen to sponsor policy–focused studies in all these disciplines. The journal publishes research articles; South European Atlas with election reports and articles on other subjects of topical interest, and an extensive book reviews section, including both review articles and individual book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Democratic backsliding, conflict, and partisan mobilisation of ethnic groups: local government control and electoral participation in Turkey Intra-party balance of power: cartelisation versus communist organisational tradition in the Cypriot radical left AKEL More flexible, less productive? The impact of employment protection legislation reforms in Italy Shared or Self-rule? Regional Legislative Initiatives in Multi-level Spain, 1979-2021 The Limits of Power Concentration and Expert Knowledge in Emergency Management: Spain’s Government Response during the First Phase of the Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1