Doctor-diagnosed sleep disorders in the United States: Prevalence and impact of tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. A population-based study
{"title":"Doctor-diagnosed sleep disorders in the United States: Prevalence and impact of tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. A population-based study","authors":"P. Kum-Nji, Samuel A. Taylor, Bah Tanwi","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2023.1113946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and purpose: We determined the prevalence of physician-diagnosed sleep disorder and its association with tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. Methods The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of 2011–2012 data base was used for the study. Subjects were asked two questions: “Ever told your doctor you had trouble sleeping?” and “Ever told by doctor have sleep disorder?” The answer “yes” to the second question indicated presence of a doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD) and “no” indicated its absence. Tobacco smoke exposure was defined by serum cotinine levels while vitamin D levels were measured by serum 25(OH) D. Eight selected variables included in the analyses were BMI, age, gender, smoking exposure, vitamin D levels, income, insurance, and race. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine if tobacco smoke exposure and Vitamin D were each predictive of DSD. Results Of 5,470 subjected aged 16 to 80+ years about 9% had doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD). In a multiple regression analysis, active tobacco smoking was predictive of DSD (OR 1.92; 95% CI = 1.38–2.69), while passive smoke exposure was not, even after controlling for all the other significant variables (OR 0.93; 95% CI = 0.57–1.52). The other variables significantly associated with DSD were by order of importance BMI (P < 0.001), Age (P < 0.001) and race (P ≤ 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency was not predictive of DSD. Conclusion The prevalence of physician-diagnosed DSD was about 9%. Active smoking but not passive smoking as defined by cotinine levels was significantly associated with DSD. Vitamin D was not predictive of DSD. Future studies are therefore needed to demonstrate whether smoking cessation could help reduce DSD.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2023.1113946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: We determined the prevalence of physician-diagnosed sleep disorder and its association with tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. Methods The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of 2011–2012 data base was used for the study. Subjects were asked two questions: “Ever told your doctor you had trouble sleeping?” and “Ever told by doctor have sleep disorder?” The answer “yes” to the second question indicated presence of a doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD) and “no” indicated its absence. Tobacco smoke exposure was defined by serum cotinine levels while vitamin D levels were measured by serum 25(OH) D. Eight selected variables included in the analyses were BMI, age, gender, smoking exposure, vitamin D levels, income, insurance, and race. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine if tobacco smoke exposure and Vitamin D were each predictive of DSD. Results Of 5,470 subjected aged 16 to 80+ years about 9% had doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD). In a multiple regression analysis, active tobacco smoking was predictive of DSD (OR 1.92; 95% CI = 1.38–2.69), while passive smoke exposure was not, even after controlling for all the other significant variables (OR 0.93; 95% CI = 0.57–1.52). The other variables significantly associated with DSD were by order of importance BMI (P < 0.001), Age (P < 0.001) and race (P ≤ 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency was not predictive of DSD. Conclusion The prevalence of physician-diagnosed DSD was about 9%. Active smoking but not passive smoking as defined by cotinine levels was significantly associated with DSD. Vitamin D was not predictive of DSD. Future studies are therefore needed to demonstrate whether smoking cessation could help reduce DSD.