Doctor-diagnosed sleep disorders in the United States: Prevalence and impact of tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. A population-based study

P. Kum-Nji, Samuel A. Taylor, Bah Tanwi
{"title":"Doctor-diagnosed sleep disorders in the United States: Prevalence and impact of tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. A population-based study","authors":"P. Kum-Nji, Samuel A. Taylor, Bah Tanwi","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2023.1113946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and purpose: We determined the prevalence of physician-diagnosed sleep disorder and its association with tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. Methods The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of 2011–2012 data base was used for the study. Subjects were asked two questions: “Ever told your doctor you had trouble sleeping?” and “Ever told by doctor have sleep disorder?” The answer “yes” to the second question indicated presence of a doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD) and “no” indicated its absence. Tobacco smoke exposure was defined by serum cotinine levels while vitamin D levels were measured by serum 25(OH) D. Eight selected variables included in the analyses were BMI, age, gender, smoking exposure, vitamin D levels, income, insurance, and race. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine if tobacco smoke exposure and Vitamin D were each predictive of DSD. Results Of 5,470 subjected aged 16 to 80+ years about 9% had doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD). In a multiple regression analysis, active tobacco smoking was predictive of DSD (OR 1.92; 95% CI = 1.38–2.69), while passive smoke exposure was not, even after controlling for all the other significant variables (OR 0.93; 95% CI = 0.57–1.52). The other variables significantly associated with DSD were by order of importance BMI (P < 0.001), Age (P < 0.001) and race (P ≤ 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency was not predictive of DSD. Conclusion The prevalence of physician-diagnosed DSD was about 9%. Active smoking but not passive smoking as defined by cotinine levels was significantly associated with DSD. Vitamin D was not predictive of DSD. Future studies are therefore needed to demonstrate whether smoking cessation could help reduce DSD.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2023.1113946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: We determined the prevalence of physician-diagnosed sleep disorder and its association with tobacco smoke exposure and vitamin D deficiency. Methods The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of 2011–2012 data base was used for the study. Subjects were asked two questions: “Ever told your doctor you had trouble sleeping?” and “Ever told by doctor have sleep disorder?” The answer “yes” to the second question indicated presence of a doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD) and “no” indicated its absence. Tobacco smoke exposure was defined by serum cotinine levels while vitamin D levels were measured by serum 25(OH) D. Eight selected variables included in the analyses were BMI, age, gender, smoking exposure, vitamin D levels, income, insurance, and race. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine if tobacco smoke exposure and Vitamin D were each predictive of DSD. Results Of 5,470 subjected aged 16 to 80+ years about 9% had doctor-diagnosed sleep disorder (DSD). In a multiple regression analysis, active tobacco smoking was predictive of DSD (OR 1.92; 95% CI = 1.38–2.69), while passive smoke exposure was not, even after controlling for all the other significant variables (OR 0.93; 95% CI = 0.57–1.52). The other variables significantly associated with DSD were by order of importance BMI (P < 0.001), Age (P < 0.001) and race (P ≤ 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency was not predictive of DSD. Conclusion The prevalence of physician-diagnosed DSD was about 9%. Active smoking but not passive smoking as defined by cotinine levels was significantly associated with DSD. Vitamin D was not predictive of DSD. Future studies are therefore needed to demonstrate whether smoking cessation could help reduce DSD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国医生诊断的睡眠障碍:吸烟和维生素D缺乏的患病率和影响。一项基于人群的研究
背景和目的:我们确定了医生诊断的睡眠障碍的患病率及其与烟草烟雾暴露和维生素D缺乏的关系。方法采用2011-2012年全国健康与营养调查数据库(NHANES)进行研究。研究对象被问及两个问题:“你是否告诉过你的医生你有睡眠问题?”和“医生告诉过你有睡眠障碍吗?”第二个问题的回答“是”表明存在医生诊断的睡眠障碍(DSD),“否”表明没有。烟草烟雾暴露由血清可替宁水平定义,而维生素D水平由血清25(OH) D测量。分析中选择的8个变量包括BMI、年龄、性别、吸烟暴露、维生素D水平、收入、保险和种族。进行了单因素和多因素分析,以确定烟草烟雾暴露和维生素D是否都能预测DSD。结果5470名16岁至80岁以上的受试者中,约9%患有医生诊断的睡眠障碍(DSD)。在多元回归分析中,积极吸烟可预测DSD (OR 1.92;95% CI = 1.38-2.69),而被动吸烟暴露并非如此,即使在控制了所有其他重要变量后(OR 0.93;95% ci = 0.57-1.52)。其他与DSD显著相关的变量依次为BMI (P < 0.001)、年龄(P < 0.001)和种族(P≤0.001)。维生素D缺乏不能预测DSD。结论经医师诊断的DSD患病率约为9%。主动吸烟而非被动吸烟(可替宁水平定义)与DSD显著相关。维生素D不能预测DSD。因此,未来的研究需要证明戒烟是否有助于减少DSD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing TeleSleep at Veterans Healthcare Administration: an organizational case study of adaptation and sustainment. Editorial: Insights in sleep-related movement disorders and parasomnias Efficacy of a telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy for improving sleep and nightmares in children aged 6–17 Insomnia severity and daytime sleepiness in caregivers of advanced age Revitalizing CPAP adherence: lessons from THN study in patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1