Decision Support in Safety Intelligence Using Pharmaconnect Knowledgebase

S. Matis, Matt Clark, Marcus Bjäreland, Brian Takasaki, N. Mian, S. Muresan, Sorona Popa
{"title":"Decision Support in Safety Intelligence Using Pharmaconnect Knowledgebase","authors":"S. Matis, Matt Clark, Marcus Bjäreland, Brian Takasaki, N. Mian, S. Muresan, Sorona Popa","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2011.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On average it takes approximately 13 years and over 1 billion dollars to take a new medical entity (NME) from a concept to an approved product. As high as 40% of the drugs fail to make it thru to market at a significant cost and even with the best of preclinical testing some do cause unexpected or “idiosyncratic” toxicity. In order to reduce the length of the development timeline, support problem solving, provide improved decision making and reduce late stage attrition, many pharmaceutical companies are developing methodology to predict safety issues earlier in this process. While the exchange of scientific knowledge is still primarily thru the published medical literature, advances in semantic technology have dramatically changed the way a scientist accesses data and information. In particular, ontology development coupled with natural language processing, have made a huge impact on the review of the scientific literature and extraction of data from internal and external sources. Creation of highly linked knowledge bases enables the development of predictive methods as well as supports problem solving. These activities have been shown to be highly useful in reducing time and effort. The Knowledge Engineering initiative within AstraZeneca has recently delivered the first version of a knowledgebase that integrates internal and external evidence for connections between key concepts such as targets, pathways, compounds, diseases, preclinical, and clinical outcome from Chemistry, Competitive, Disease and Safety Intelligence workstreams. This talk will describe the system; demonstrate the impact of this new platform with specific examples from Safety, and discuss lessons learned during its development. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine 978-0-7695-4574-5/11 $26.00 © 2011 IEEE DOI 10.1109/BIBM.2011.135 661","PeriodicalId":6345,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW)","volume":"119 1","pages":"661-661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2011.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On average it takes approximately 13 years and over 1 billion dollars to take a new medical entity (NME) from a concept to an approved product. As high as 40% of the drugs fail to make it thru to market at a significant cost and even with the best of preclinical testing some do cause unexpected or “idiosyncratic” toxicity. In order to reduce the length of the development timeline, support problem solving, provide improved decision making and reduce late stage attrition, many pharmaceutical companies are developing methodology to predict safety issues earlier in this process. While the exchange of scientific knowledge is still primarily thru the published medical literature, advances in semantic technology have dramatically changed the way a scientist accesses data and information. In particular, ontology development coupled with natural language processing, have made a huge impact on the review of the scientific literature and extraction of data from internal and external sources. Creation of highly linked knowledge bases enables the development of predictive methods as well as supports problem solving. These activities have been shown to be highly useful in reducing time and effort. The Knowledge Engineering initiative within AstraZeneca has recently delivered the first version of a knowledgebase that integrates internal and external evidence for connections between key concepts such as targets, pathways, compounds, diseases, preclinical, and clinical outcome from Chemistry, Competitive, Disease and Safety Intelligence workstreams. This talk will describe the system; demonstrate the impact of this new platform with specific examples from Safety, and discuss lessons learned during its development. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine 978-0-7695-4574-5/11 $26.00 © 2011 IEEE DOI 10.1109/BIBM.2011.135 661
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Pharmaconnect知识库的安全智能决策支持
一个新的医疗实体(NME)从一个概念到一个批准的产品,平均需要大约13年和超过10亿美元。高达40%的药物未能以高昂的成本进入市场,即使进行了最好的临床前测试,一些药物也会产生意想不到的或“特殊”的毒性。为了缩短开发时间,支持问题的解决,提供改进的决策并减少后期的人员流失,许多制药公司正在开发方法来预测该过程的早期安全性问题。虽然科学知识的交流仍然主要是通过发表的医学文献,但语义技术的进步已经极大地改变了科学家获取数据和信息的方式。特别是,本体的发展与自然语言处理相结合,对科学文献的审查和从内部和外部来源提取数据产生了巨大的影响。创建高度关联的知识库可以开发预测方法,并支持解决问题。这些活动已被证明在减少时间和精力方面非常有用。阿斯利康的知识工程计划最近发布了第一版知识库,该知识库集成了来自化学、竞争、疾病和安全情报工作流程的关键概念(如靶点、途径、化合物、疾病、临床前和临床结果)之间联系的内部和外部证据。这次演讲将描述这个系统;用来自Safety的具体例子展示这个新平台的影响,并讨论在其开发过程中获得的经验教训。2011 IEEE国际生物信息学与生物医学会议978-0-7695-4574-5/11 $26.00©2011 IEEE DOI 10.1109/BIBM.2011.135 661
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of protein architectures inferred from phylogenomic analysis of CATH Hierarchical modeling of alternative exon usage associations with survival 3D point cloud sensors for low-cost medical in-situ visualization Bayesian Classifiers for Chemical Toxicity Prediction Normal mode analysis of protein structure dynamics based on residue contact energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1