The Bretton Woods institutions and the quest for development in Africa

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.26618/ojip.v13i2.11938
Zekeri Momoh
{"title":"The Bretton Woods institutions and the quest for development in Africa","authors":"Zekeri Momoh","doi":"10.26618/ojip.v13i2.11938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of the Bretton Woods Institutions in Africa has been subjected to intense debate in the literature of International Relations. This is so particularly because of the implications of the Bretton Woods Institutions on the political and economic activities in Africa. The data for this study were collected from secondary sources such as textbooks and journal articles while content analysis was used to analyse the data collected. The \"False Paradigm Model,\" propounded by Michael Todaro which is a variant of the Dependency theory, was used for this study. This study revealed mechanisms put in place by the Bretton Woods Institutions in its relationship with African states and it also undertook a critique of the Bretton woods institutional approach to Africa’s development using the false paradigm model. The study further revealed that in spite of experimenting with external development methods and initiatives by the Bretton Wood Institutions, African Economies have not advanced much in terms of development. It implies that African nations must turn within to find it rather than focusing on the Bretton Woods Institutions requirements.","PeriodicalId":40252,"journal":{"name":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v13i2.11938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of the Bretton Woods Institutions in Africa has been subjected to intense debate in the literature of International Relations. This is so particularly because of the implications of the Bretton Woods Institutions on the political and economic activities in Africa. The data for this study were collected from secondary sources such as textbooks and journal articles while content analysis was used to analyse the data collected. The "False Paradigm Model," propounded by Michael Todaro which is a variant of the Dependency theory, was used for this study. This study revealed mechanisms put in place by the Bretton Woods Institutions in its relationship with African states and it also undertook a critique of the Bretton woods institutional approach to Africa’s development using the false paradigm model. The study further revealed that in spite of experimenting with external development methods and initiatives by the Bretton Wood Institutions, African Economies have not advanced much in terms of development. It implies that African nations must turn within to find it rather than focusing on the Bretton Woods Institutions requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布雷顿森林机构和对非洲发展的追求
在国际关系文献中,布雷顿森林机构在非洲的作用一直是激烈辩论的对象。这尤其是因为布雷顿森林机构对非洲政治和经济活动的影响。本研究的数据收集自二手来源,如教科书和期刊文章,而内容分析用于分析收集的数据。Michael Todaro提出的“错误范式模型”是依赖理论的一种变体,用于本研究。这项研究揭示了布雷顿森林机构在其与非洲国家的关系中建立的机制,并利用错误的范式模型对布雷顿森林机构对非洲发展的做法进行了批评。这项研究进一步表明,尽管布雷顿森林机构尝试了外部发展方法和倡议,但非洲各经济体在发展方面并没有取得多大进展。这意味着非洲国家必须从内部寻找解决办法,而不是把重点放在布雷顿森林机构的要求上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Civil Service Police Unit principle : no punishment and no taxation without representation The Bretton Woods institutions and the quest for development in Africa Disputing land: argumentative turn in local land policy conflict in Central Java, Indonesia Declining democracy: autocratization in Indonesia during the Jokowi years Policy process in Indonesia during COVID-19: a cross-sectoral policy perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1