Facebook as a ‘trusted space of everyday communication’: Parties, citizens and direct representation

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1386/ajms_00019_1
A. Larsson
{"title":"Facebook as a ‘trusted space of everyday communication’: Parties, citizens and direct representation","authors":"A. Larsson","doi":"10.1386/ajms_00019_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detailing processes related to direct representation in a longitudinal fashion, the study at hand gauges the degree to which Swedish political parties have utilized their Facebook pages during a four-year period covering two elections. Moreover, the study provides insights into citizen\n interaction by measuring the types of engagement preferred by Facebook users in relation to the party pages. Results indicate that while the bulk of parties appear as largely organizing their online activity in relation to election campaigns, the small, non-parliamentary Pirate Party emerges\n as taking an approach more in line with the permanent campaign aspect of direct representation. Moreover, while results indicate that citizens are indeed engaging with parties on Facebook, they do so mostly through ‘liking’ rather than commenting ‐ arguably a tendency suggesting\n limited interest in online discussion and deliberation.","PeriodicalId":43197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00019_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Detailing processes related to direct representation in a longitudinal fashion, the study at hand gauges the degree to which Swedish political parties have utilized their Facebook pages during a four-year period covering two elections. Moreover, the study provides insights into citizen interaction by measuring the types of engagement preferred by Facebook users in relation to the party pages. Results indicate that while the bulk of parties appear as largely organizing their online activity in relation to election campaigns, the small, non-parliamentary Pirate Party emerges as taking an approach more in line with the permanent campaign aspect of direct representation. Moreover, while results indicate that citizens are indeed engaging with parties on Facebook, they do so mostly through ‘liking’ rather than commenting ‐ arguably a tendency suggesting limited interest in online discussion and deliberation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook是一个“可信赖的日常交流空间”:政党、公民和直接代表
这项研究以纵向的方式详细介绍了与直接代表有关的过程,评估了瑞典政党在为期四年的两次选举中利用其Facebook页面的程度。此外,该研究还通过衡量Facebook用户偏好的参与类型与政党页面的关系,为公民互动提供了见解。结果显示,虽然大多数政党似乎都在组织与竞选活动有关的在线活动,但小型的非议会海盗党却采取了更符合直接代表的永久性竞选方面的方法。此外,虽然结果表明,公民确实在Facebook上参与政党活动,但他们主要是通过“点赞”而不是评论来进行的——可以说,这种趋势表明人们对在线讨论和审议的兴趣有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Manufacturing foreign news from afar: Views from an editor’s desk Pressure, compromise and overwork: How Australian regional journalists gain job satisfaction through community service News Values from an Audience Perspective Mediatization(s): Theoretical Conversations between Europe and Latin America, Carlos A. Scolari, José L. Fernández and Joan R. Rodríguez-Amat (Eds) (2021) Assessing adherence to guidelines of media reporting on suicide based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model and Agenda-Setting Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1