The Origin of Transformation of ‘Aqidah and Their Impact on Politics: A Study on Zayd bin ‘Alī and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn

Mohammad Qaed Mohammad Qaed Hassan Alwajeeh
{"title":"The Origin of Transformation of ‘Aqidah and Their Impact on Politics: A Study on Zayd bin ‘Alī and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn","authors":"Mohammad Qaed Mohammad Qaed Hassan Alwajeeh","doi":"10.22452/afkar.vol23no1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study highlights the differences of political thought between Zayd bin ‘Alī bin Abi Talib r.a and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn, founder of Zaydiyyah state in Yemen regarding the doctrine of al-Imamah, al-Wisayah, al-‘Ismah, al-Rajʽah and al-Taqiyyah. Therefore, this article adopts the inductive descriptive historical approach to achieve the objectives of the study. The most significant results shows that Zayd bin ‘Alī denied the Imams’ infallibility, al-Mahdiyyah and rajʽah, al-Wisayah (guardianship), taqiyyah and otherwise acknowledged the legitimacy of the two early caliphs; which makes his madhhab among the most moderate and the closest to the Sunni. In contrast, Yahyā bin al-Ḥusayn linked the concept of imamate to the Prophethood, acknowledged rajʽāh and al-Wisayah as proof of the legitimacy of ‘Ali (radiyallah anh) and his sons as imams. This stand shows an agreement with the Twelver (Shia Ithna ‘Ashariyyah).","PeriodicalId":53770,"journal":{"name":"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol23no1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study highlights the differences of political thought between Zayd bin ‘Alī bin Abi Talib r.a and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn, founder of Zaydiyyah state in Yemen regarding the doctrine of al-Imamah, al-Wisayah, al-‘Ismah, al-Rajʽah and al-Taqiyyah. Therefore, this article adopts the inductive descriptive historical approach to achieve the objectives of the study. The most significant results shows that Zayd bin ‘Alī denied the Imams’ infallibility, al-Mahdiyyah and rajʽah, al-Wisayah (guardianship), taqiyyah and otherwise acknowledged the legitimacy of the two early caliphs; which makes his madhhab among the most moderate and the closest to the Sunni. In contrast, Yahyā bin al-Ḥusayn linked the concept of imamate to the Prophethood, acknowledged rajʽāh and al-Wisayah as proof of the legitimacy of ‘Ali (radiyallah anh) and his sons as imams. This stand shows an agreement with the Twelver (Shia Ithna ‘Ashariyyah).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿齐达转型的起源及其对政治的影响——以扎伊德·本·阿尔伊和Yaḥyā本·阿尔伊-Ḥusayn为例
本研究着重分析了扎伊德·本·阿尔·本·阿比·塔利布与也门扎伊迪耶国创始人Yaḥyā本·阿尔-Ḥusayn在伊玛玛、维萨耶、伊斯玛、拉吉·阿哈和塔奇耶教义方面的政治思想差异。因此,本文采用归纳描述性的历史方法来达到研究的目的。最重要的结果表明,扎伊德·本·阿尔伊否认伊玛目的无错,al-Mahdiyyah和raj yaah, al-Wisayah(监护),taqiyyah,并在其他方面承认两位早期哈里发的合法性;这使得他的madhhab成为最温和、最接近逊尼派的人之一。相比之下,yahyybin al-Ḥusayn将伊玛目的概念与先知联系起来,承认raj al- āh和al- wisayah是阿里(radiyallah anh)及其儿子作为伊玛目合法性的证明。这一立场显示了与十二神(Shia Ithna’Ashariyyah)的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
60.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
On the Question of Kitab Jawi’s Originality: Analysis on al-Fatani’s Nahj al-Raghibin on Essentials of Sale Contract Konsep Uslub Amr Bagi Konteks Akidah dalam Surah Al-Mulk Berdasarkan Pendapat Al-Awsi Extremist Characteristics Based on Arrested Cases in Southeast Asia Ideologi Kesamarataan antara Lelaki dan Wanita Berdasarkan Perspektif Naqli dan Neurosains Developing Islamic Psychospiritual Guidelines for Covid-19 Task Counsellors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1