The strategic research agenda of academics and the involvement of non-academic peers in research in regimes of academic nested hybridity

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI:10.1080/21568235.2022.2105373
H. Horta, J.M. Santos, P. M. Loureiro
{"title":"The strategic research agenda of academics and the involvement of non-academic peers in research in regimes of academic nested hybridity","authors":"H. Horta, J.M. Santos, P. M. Loureiro","doi":"10.1080/21568235.2022.2105373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The involvement of non-academics in academic research is key to boosting knowledge exchange and ensuring that academic research is more effective in contributing to tackling the challenges faced by organizations and citizens. Although incentives, together with new organizational and knowledge producing modes, have fostered this involvement, the literature has found that the willingness of academics to collaborate with non-academics is mixed and related to individual traits and preferences, conflicting working logics, and other constraints. This study contributes to this literature by assessing the strategic research agendas of academics as a novel factor in determining their willingness to involve non-academic peers in research activities. The findings underlined the critical importance of academics’ strategic research agendas in determining their engagement with non-academics in their research. The findings also showed conflicting logics, suggesting that PhD training, career progression, and organizational incentives fostering knowledge output activities need to be considered and adapted.","PeriodicalId":37345,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Higher Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"355 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2105373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The involvement of non-academics in academic research is key to boosting knowledge exchange and ensuring that academic research is more effective in contributing to tackling the challenges faced by organizations and citizens. Although incentives, together with new organizational and knowledge producing modes, have fostered this involvement, the literature has found that the willingness of academics to collaborate with non-academics is mixed and related to individual traits and preferences, conflicting working logics, and other constraints. This study contributes to this literature by assessing the strategic research agendas of academics as a novel factor in determining their willingness to involve non-academic peers in research activities. The findings underlined the critical importance of academics’ strategic research agendas in determining their engagement with non-academics in their research. The findings also showed conflicting logics, suggesting that PhD training, career progression, and organizational incentives fostering knowledge output activities need to be considered and adapted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术界的战略研究议程与非学术界同行在学术嵌套杂交制度下的研究参与
非学者参与学术研究是促进知识交流和确保学术研究更有效地应对组织和公民所面临的挑战的关键。尽管激励机制以及新的组织和知识生产模式促进了这种参与,但文献发现,学者与非学者合作的意愿是混合的,并且与个人特征和偏好、相互冲突的工作逻辑和其他约束有关。本研究通过评估学者的战略研究议程作为决定他们参与研究活动的意愿的一个新因素,为本文献做出了贡献。研究结果强调了学者的战略研究议程在决定他们与非学者参与研究方面的关键重要性。研究结果还显示了相互矛盾的逻辑,表明博士培训、职业发展和促进知识输出活动的组织激励需要考虑和调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Higher Education
European Journal of Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Higher Education (EJHE) aims to offer comprehensive coverage of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of higher education, analyses of European and national higher education reforms and processes, and European comparative studies or comparisons between European and non-European higher education systems and institutions. Building on the successful legacy of its predecessor, Higher Education in Europe, EJHE is establishing itself as one of the flagship journals in the study of higher education and specifically in study of European higher education.
期刊最新文献
Finding your feet in the dark: how making teaching and learning visible enables change in course and assessment design Workplace bullying, stress, burnout, and the role of perceived social support: findings from a Swedish national prevalence study in higher education ‘To go or not to go’: organizational determinants of academic staff participation in teaching mobility – a structural equation modelling approach ‘It’s like two different worlds’: the multifaceted nature of social support in students’ transition from high school to a problem-based learning undergraduate programme Between short-term and medium-to-long-term responses: mapping the impact of COVID-19 on Italian universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1