Earthship buildings: stakeholder opinions of their contribution towards sustainable alternative housing in the United Kingdom

Carrie L. Booth, R. Horry, C. Isaac, A. Mahamadu, P. Manu, Kgb Awuah, E. Aboagye-Nimo, P. Georgakis, A. Prabhakaran
{"title":"Earthship buildings: stakeholder opinions of their contribution towards sustainable alternative housing in the United Kingdom","authors":"Carrie L. Booth, R. Horry, C. Isaac, A. Mahamadu, P. Manu, Kgb Awuah, E. Aboagye-Nimo, P. Georgakis, A. Prabhakaran","doi":"10.1680/jmapl.22.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Society requires additional affordable housing to meet its growing demands. Further, people expect their homes to meet sustainability targets and for the lifestyles they proffer to accord with low impact living. Earthship buildings are marketed as being an epitome of sustainable alternative housing. Built by reusing or repurposing mostly reclaimed urban waste products, their design includes the utilization of low embodied energy materials, passive solar heating and cooling, photovoltaic power systems, rainwater harvesting, solar hot water heating, along with black and grey water treatment systems. Thus, Earthship buildings are considered exemplars for contributions to both the sustainability and climate change agendas. This study explores stakeholder opinions of whether Earthship buildings can contribute towards the future of alternative housing in the United Kingdom (UK). Opinions were sought through questionnaire survey completed by UK members of online social media groups whose shared focus is related to sustainability (n=50). Results reveal that the public believe the main benefits are their minimal environmental impact and also their reliance on renewable energy resources; whilst the main barriers are identifying suitable building plots and obtaining the necessary planning permissions to build. Notwithstanding the participants included in this study already have an interest in sustainability issues, it is surmised that the general public deem the general principles of Earthships are an acceptable choice of alternative home/living. However, whilst the uptake of Earthship homes are proving increasing popular in some parts of the world, the upmost concern within the UK setting is the reality of finding somewhere suitable to build an Earthship and then being given the required authorisations to construct the building. Therefore, the study recommends a need for future Earthship investigations to review the bureaucratic obstacles encountered during land searches and acquisitions and, alongside this, appraise the challenges of gaining the necessary planning permissions.","PeriodicalId":44163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","volume":"42 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.22.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Society requires additional affordable housing to meet its growing demands. Further, people expect their homes to meet sustainability targets and for the lifestyles they proffer to accord with low impact living. Earthship buildings are marketed as being an epitome of sustainable alternative housing. Built by reusing or repurposing mostly reclaimed urban waste products, their design includes the utilization of low embodied energy materials, passive solar heating and cooling, photovoltaic power systems, rainwater harvesting, solar hot water heating, along with black and grey water treatment systems. Thus, Earthship buildings are considered exemplars for contributions to both the sustainability and climate change agendas. This study explores stakeholder opinions of whether Earthship buildings can contribute towards the future of alternative housing in the United Kingdom (UK). Opinions were sought through questionnaire survey completed by UK members of online social media groups whose shared focus is related to sustainability (n=50). Results reveal that the public believe the main benefits are their minimal environmental impact and also their reliance on renewable energy resources; whilst the main barriers are identifying suitable building plots and obtaining the necessary planning permissions to build. Notwithstanding the participants included in this study already have an interest in sustainability issues, it is surmised that the general public deem the general principles of Earthships are an acceptable choice of alternative home/living. However, whilst the uptake of Earthship homes are proving increasing popular in some parts of the world, the upmost concern within the UK setting is the reality of finding somewhere suitable to build an Earthship and then being given the required authorisations to construct the building. Therefore, the study recommends a need for future Earthship investigations to review the bureaucratic obstacles encountered during land searches and acquisitions and, alongside this, appraise the challenges of gaining the necessary planning permissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球建筑:利益相关者对他们对英国可持续替代住房的贡献的意见
社会需要更多的经济适用房来满足日益增长的需求。此外,人们希望他们的家园能够达到可持续发展的目标,并为他们提供的生活方式符合低影响的生活方式。Earthship建筑被营销为可持续替代住房的缩影。通过再利用或重新利用大部分回收的城市废物,他们的设计包括利用低隐含能源材料,被动式太阳能加热和冷却,光伏发电系统,雨水收集,太阳能热水加热,以及黑水和中水处理系统。因此,Earthship建筑被认为是对可持续发展和气候变化议程做出贡献的典范。本研究探讨了利益相关者对Earthship建筑是否可以为英国替代住房的未来做出贡献的意见。我们通过问卷调查来征求意见,问卷调查由共同关注可持续发展的在线社交媒体团体的英国成员完成(n=50)。结果显示,公众认为主要的好处是它们对环境的影响最小,而且它们对可再生能源的依赖;而主要的障碍是确定合适的建筑用地和获得必要的规划许可来建造。尽管本研究的参与者已经对可持续性问题感兴趣,但据推测,一般公众认为地球船的一般原则是一种可接受的替代家庭/生活选择。然而,虽然地球船房屋在世界某些地区越来越受欢迎,但英国最关心的问题是找到适合建造地球船的地方,然后获得建造建筑物所需的授权。因此,该研究建议有必要在未来进行Earthship调查,以审查在土地搜索和收购过程中遇到的官僚主义障碍,并评估获得必要规划许可的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Construction Industry, An Evaluation of UK Research and Practice – by Andrew Agapiou Construction Law Quarterly The potential for construction statutory adjudication in Pakistan: drawing conclusions from the United Kingdom’s system Application of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for construction safety research Construction Law Quarterly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1