Synthesis and Distillation of Policy Issues: What Should Governments Do? The Global Financial Crisis as a Market and Government Failure

Q1 Arts and Humanities Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Pub Date : 2009-06-19 DOI:10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1065
J. Teehankee
{"title":"Synthesis and Distillation of Policy Issues: What Should Governments Do? The Global Financial Crisis as a Market and Government Failure","authors":"J. Teehankee","doi":"10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Some of the current financial issues and problems besetting the world economies may be traced to the rise of neoliberalism in the 1980s which centered on free markets and free trade with the consequent less government regulation. Liberalization led to global prosperity and innovation after two decades but extreme market fundamentalism also contributed to the present financial crisis. Is the problem one of governance, of market failure or of people? It is all of these. Markets failed to allocate resources into an efficient manner; governments failed to curb the excesses of the markets. Policy analyses and the presentation of the speakers in the conference reveal that the possible solution is not limited to economics but should also include political adjustments in terms of policy pronouncements. There is a need to look into the equity issues, especially the safety nets of people who will be displaced by the ill effects of the financial crisis. A balance between politics, the experts, the players, the markets and everyone else is emphasized.","PeriodicalId":39323,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","volume":"59 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3860/APSSR.V9I1.1065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Some of the current financial issues and problems besetting the world economies may be traced to the rise of neoliberalism in the 1980s which centered on free markets and free trade with the consequent less government regulation. Liberalization led to global prosperity and innovation after two decades but extreme market fundamentalism also contributed to the present financial crisis. Is the problem one of governance, of market failure or of people? It is all of these. Markets failed to allocate resources into an efficient manner; governments failed to curb the excesses of the markets. Policy analyses and the presentation of the speakers in the conference reveal that the possible solution is not limited to economics but should also include political adjustments in terms of policy pronouncements. There is a need to look into the equity issues, especially the safety nets of people who will be displaced by the ill effects of the financial crisis. A balance between politics, the experts, the players, the markets and everyone else is emphasized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策问题的综合与提炼:政府应该怎么做?作为市场和政府失灵的全球金融危机
当前困扰世界经济的一些金融问题和问题可以追溯到20世纪80年代新自由主义的兴起,它以自由市场和自由贸易为中心,随之而来的是政府管制的减少。20年后,自由化带来了全球繁荣和创新,但极端的市场原教旨主义也导致了当前的金融危机。问题出在治理、市场失灵还是人的身上?它是所有这些。市场未能有效配置资源;政府未能遏制市场的过度行为。政策分析和会议发言人的发言表明,可能的解决方案不仅限于经济,还应包括政策声明方面的政治调整。有必要研究公平问题,特别是那些将因金融危机的不良影响而流离失所的人的安全网。强调政治、专家、参与者、市场和其他所有人之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Social Science Review
Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Social Science Review (APSSR) is an internationally refereed journal published biannually (June and December) by De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. It aims to be a leading venue for authors seeking to share their data and perspectives on compelling and emerging topics in the social sciences with, and to create an impact on, the region’s communities of academics, researchers, students, civil society, policymakers, development specialists, among others. Topics related to or with implications for the region that are pursued employing sound methodologies and comparative, and inter, multi and transdisciplinary approaches are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
From the Editor: Vol.10(2) 2010 Effect of District Magnitude on Electoral Corruption under a Block Vote System: The Case of Thailand Renewable Energy (RE) Sector Development in the Philippines Based on the Perspectives and Experiences of Selected Industry Managers Fiction as Fact: False Memories of WWII in the Philippines The State and "Transnational Advocacy Networks" in the Prevention and Control of Transnational Crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1