The Problem of the Unbridgeable Ontological Gap Between the Brain and Our Private Experiences in Wittgensteinian Terms

Q2 Arts and Humanities Discurso y Sociedad Pub Date : 2019-06-24 DOI:10.11606/ISSN.2318-8863.DISCURSO.2019.159310
Nara M. Figueiredo
{"title":"The Problem of the Unbridgeable Ontological Gap Between the Brain and Our Private Experiences in Wittgensteinian Terms","authors":"Nara M. Figueiredo","doi":"10.11606/ISSN.2318-8863.DISCURSO.2019.159310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper argues that the common notion that there is a gap between a physical scope, namely, brain processes, and something immaterial such as private experiences is an illusion provoked by the conceptual conflicts of our understanding. In order to overcome this illusion, it is necessary to clarify the foundations and implications of the uses of key concepts in the cognitive field.","PeriodicalId":37350,"journal":{"name":"Discurso y Sociedad","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discurso y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2318-8863.DISCURSO.2019.159310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper argues that the common notion that there is a gap between a physical scope, namely, brain processes, and something immaterial such as private experiences is an illusion provoked by the conceptual conflicts of our understanding. In order to overcome this illusion, it is necessary to clarify the foundations and implications of the uses of key concepts in the cognitive field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用维特根斯坦的话说,大脑和我们的私人经验之间不可逾越的本体论鸿沟的问题
这篇论文认为,在物理范围(即大脑过程)和非物质的东西(如私人经历)之间存在差距的普遍观念是由我们理解的概念冲突引起的错觉。为了克服这种错觉,有必要澄清认知领域关键概念使用的基础和含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discurso y Sociedad
Discurso y Sociedad Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Excedente de visão e exotopia em narrativas sobre violência doméstica no podcast Atena: elas por elas La Plata en el discurso de la política peruana: un estudio de casos Práticas biopolíticas no governo da infância: dos manuais DSM às comunidades biossociais de redes sociais virtuais – análise do Facebook Evaluación, calificación y promoción escolar en el Decreto 67 en Chile: análisis discursivo de las perspectivas conceptuales y de los roles de los actores educacionales La extrema derecha populista en Twitter. Análisis comparado del discurso de sus líderes en España, Francia e Italia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1