Peripheral Metropolises in Southeast Europe. An Introduction

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1553/MOEGG162S9
Walter Matznetter, R. Musil
{"title":"Peripheral Metropolises in Southeast Europe. An Introduction","authors":"Walter Matznetter, R. Musil","doi":"10.1553/MOEGG162S9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the European peripheries, Southeast Europe stands out as a specific periphery. In a historic view, it is rooted in a Byzantine and Ottoman past. Industrialisation and urbanisation arrived with considerable delay, to be intensified by varieties of Communist rule after World War II. Since 1989/1992, post-socialist transformation was accompanied by the break-up of Yugoslavia and several wars. After stabilisation, eight nation-states have applied for EU membership, and four have joined since. For the metropolises (and capital cities) of this region, integration into the European and global economy has increased their status as gateways for investment and traffic – tending to leave their own, the periphery’s periphery, behind. Large urban development projects are being planned and built in all metropolises of Southeast Europe, as symbols of new nation-states and anchors for investment capital. In the name of national priorities and technocratic necessities, special legislation tends to by-pass local powers. All these topics are analysed in the five articles on “Peripheral Metropolises – Urban Dynamics in Southeast Europe” that follow, to which this article offers an overview and introduction.","PeriodicalId":44373,"journal":{"name":"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft","volume":"86 1","pages":"9-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/MOEGG162S9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the European peripheries, Southeast Europe stands out as a specific periphery. In a historic view, it is rooted in a Byzantine and Ottoman past. Industrialisation and urbanisation arrived with considerable delay, to be intensified by varieties of Communist rule after World War II. Since 1989/1992, post-socialist transformation was accompanied by the break-up of Yugoslavia and several wars. After stabilisation, eight nation-states have applied for EU membership, and four have joined since. For the metropolises (and capital cities) of this region, integration into the European and global economy has increased their status as gateways for investment and traffic – tending to leave their own, the periphery’s periphery, behind. Large urban development projects are being planned and built in all metropolises of Southeast Europe, as symbols of new nation-states and anchors for investment capital. In the name of national priorities and technocratic necessities, special legislation tends to by-pass local powers. All these topics are analysed in the five articles on “Peripheral Metropolises – Urban Dynamics in Southeast Europe” that follow, to which this article offers an overview and introduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东南欧周边大都市。介绍
在欧洲外围地区中,东南欧作为一个特殊的外围地区脱颖而出。从历史的角度来看,它植根于拜占庭和奥斯曼帝国的过去。工业化和城市化姗姗来迟,在第二次世界大战后,各种共产主义统治加剧了工业化和城市化。自1989/1992年以来,后社会主义转型伴随着南斯拉夫的解体和几次战争。稳定之后,8个民族国家申请加入欧盟,此后又有4个国家加入。对于该地区的大都市(和首都城市)来说,融入欧洲和全球经济提高了它们作为投资和交通门户的地位——倾向于把自己的、外围的外围抛在后面。东南欧所有大都市都在规划和建设大型城市发展项目,作为新兴民族国家的象征和投资资本的锚点。在国家优先事项和技术官僚需要的名义下,特别立法往往绕过地方权力。所有这些主题都在接下来的五篇文章“周边大都市-东南欧的城市动态”中进行了分析,本文对此进行了概述和介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
From Exception to Norm? Analysing Gated Housing in Sofia and Kiev since 1989 The Urban Transformations of Post-Yugoslavia: Negotiating the Contemporary City in Sarajevo, Belgrade, and Zagreb Transferring the Territorial Cohesion Ideal of Integrated Polycentric Development in the Light of Peripheralisation – Insights from Romania Wanderungsmotive ausgewählter Bevölkerungsgruppen in Kärnten Multiple Dimensions of Mediatised Translocal Social Practices. A Case Study of Domestic Migrants in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1