Exploratory spatial analysis of food insecurity and diabetes: an application of multiscale geographically weighted regression

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Annals of GIS Pub Date : 2023-05-14 DOI:10.1080/19475683.2023.2208199
Andy Sharma
{"title":"Exploratory spatial analysis of food insecurity and diabetes: an application of multiscale geographically weighted regression","authors":"Andy Sharma","doi":"10.1080/19475683.2023.2208199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Both food insecurity and diabetes are important public health concerns. For example, diabetes remained a leading cause of mortality both in the United States (U.S.) and globally during the past decade. Meanwhile, an estimated 11% of households endured food insecurity in the U.S. in 2021 with higher rates in the Southeast region. While significant advancements have occurred in better understanding food insecurity, its relationship with diabetes has yielded mixed results. Due to these inconsistent findings, a better understanding of how food insecurity may be associated with diabetes, particularly at the county-level, can improve population health and well-being. This study advanced such an area by undertaking a cross-sectional observational study for the Southeastern region of the U.S. (e.g. Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee with 319 counties as the unit of analysis), an area disproportionately impacted by both food insecurity and diabetes. The overall design applied the socio-ecological perspective within a multiscale geographically weighted regression framework or MGWR. MGWR is a recent development and a more advanced approach which allowed adjustments for geographic space and scale. Results showed food insecurity (estimate of 0.28) was positively associated with diabetes but the relation varied in magnitude and significance across space (range of −0.10 to 1.19). That is, food insecurity exhibited a strong, positive association for northwestern Arkansas, a mild association for central Mississippi and Tennessee, and a weaker association for southern Alabama and eastern Tennessee. Households without internet access also exhibited a positive association (estimate of 0.15), as did convenience stores per thousand (estimate of 0.12). These findings add value to our understanding of how geographic space and scale matter when examining health. Public health practitioners can recognize such variations when devising targeted interventions for food insecurity and diabetes care.","PeriodicalId":46270,"journal":{"name":"Annals of GIS","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of GIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2023.2208199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Both food insecurity and diabetes are important public health concerns. For example, diabetes remained a leading cause of mortality both in the United States (U.S.) and globally during the past decade. Meanwhile, an estimated 11% of households endured food insecurity in the U.S. in 2021 with higher rates in the Southeast region. While significant advancements have occurred in better understanding food insecurity, its relationship with diabetes has yielded mixed results. Due to these inconsistent findings, a better understanding of how food insecurity may be associated with diabetes, particularly at the county-level, can improve population health and well-being. This study advanced such an area by undertaking a cross-sectional observational study for the Southeastern region of the U.S. (e.g. Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee with 319 counties as the unit of analysis), an area disproportionately impacted by both food insecurity and diabetes. The overall design applied the socio-ecological perspective within a multiscale geographically weighted regression framework or MGWR. MGWR is a recent development and a more advanced approach which allowed adjustments for geographic space and scale. Results showed food insecurity (estimate of 0.28) was positively associated with diabetes but the relation varied in magnitude and significance across space (range of −0.10 to 1.19). That is, food insecurity exhibited a strong, positive association for northwestern Arkansas, a mild association for central Mississippi and Tennessee, and a weaker association for southern Alabama and eastern Tennessee. Households without internet access also exhibited a positive association (estimate of 0.15), as did convenience stores per thousand (estimate of 0.12). These findings add value to our understanding of how geographic space and scale matter when examining health. Public health practitioners can recognize such variations when devising targeted interventions for food insecurity and diabetes care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粮食不安全和糖尿病的探索性空间分析:多尺度地理加权回归的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of GIS
Annals of GIS Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Zero watermarking algorithm for BIM data based on distance partitioning and local feature Controlling for spatial confounding and spatial interference in causal inference: modelling insights from a computational experiment Application of GIS and fuzzy sets to small-scale site suitability assessment for extensive brackish water aquaculture Revealing intra-urban hierarchical spatial structure through representation learning by combining road network abstraction model and taxi trajectory data The time- and distance-decay effects of hurricane relevancy on social media: an empirical study of three hurricanes in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1