Evaluation of the radiopacity of a MTA-based root-canal filling material using digital radiography

B. Gümrü, B. Tarçın, Dilek Türkaydın, E. Iriboz, H. Öveçoğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of the radiopacity of a MTA-based root-canal filling material using digital radiography","authors":"B. Gümrü, B. Tarçın, Dilek Türkaydın, E. Iriboz, H. Öveçoğlu","doi":"10.5455/MUSBED.20130109102035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:  The aim of this study was to assess the radiopacity of a relatively new mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based root-canal filling material and to compare it with four currently used root-canal filling materials using a digital imaging system. Methods:  The root-canal filling materials tested were MTA Fillapex, Adseal, AH Plus, Endomethasone and gutta-percha cones. Standard disks of five different root-canal filling materials were exposed together with an aluminum stepwedge calibrated in millimeters. For the radiographic exposures, a storage phosphor plate (size 4; 5.7x7.6 cm) and an x-ray machine at 70 kVp and 8 mA were used. The object-to-focus distance was 30 cm, and the exposure time was 0.2 sec. The grey values of the test materials were measured digitally using the system’s own software and compared with the stepwedge to find the equivalent thickness of aluminum. The data were analyzed statistically with significance levels set at p<0.05. Results:  The radiopacity values of the studied materials in decreasing order, expressed in millimeters of aluminum equivalent, were: AH Plus (9.70), gutta-percha (6.82), MTA Fillapex (5.30), Adseal (3.71) and Endomethasone (3.67). Statistically significant differences were found between mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p<0.005), AH Plus showing the highest value. Conclusion:  MTA Fillapex was the third most radiopaque root-canal filling material among the tested materials in the study. All of the materials evaluated met the minimum radiopacity standard recommended by International Organization for Standardization and the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association. Key words:  Aluminum stepwedge, digital radiography, radiopacity, root-canal filling material","PeriodicalId":16169,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences","volume":"1999 1","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/MUSBED.20130109102035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective:  The aim of this study was to assess the radiopacity of a relatively new mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based root-canal filling material and to compare it with four currently used root-canal filling materials using a digital imaging system. Methods:  The root-canal filling materials tested were MTA Fillapex, Adseal, AH Plus, Endomethasone and gutta-percha cones. Standard disks of five different root-canal filling materials were exposed together with an aluminum stepwedge calibrated in millimeters. For the radiographic exposures, a storage phosphor plate (size 4; 5.7x7.6 cm) and an x-ray machine at 70 kVp and 8 mA were used. The object-to-focus distance was 30 cm, and the exposure time was 0.2 sec. The grey values of the test materials were measured digitally using the system’s own software and compared with the stepwedge to find the equivalent thickness of aluminum. The data were analyzed statistically with significance levels set at p<0.05. Results:  The radiopacity values of the studied materials in decreasing order, expressed in millimeters of aluminum equivalent, were: AH Plus (9.70), gutta-percha (6.82), MTA Fillapex (5.30), Adseal (3.71) and Endomethasone (3.67). Statistically significant differences were found between mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p<0.005), AH Plus showing the highest value. Conclusion:  MTA Fillapex was the third most radiopaque root-canal filling material among the tested materials in the study. All of the materials evaluated met the minimum radiopacity standard recommended by International Organization for Standardization and the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association. Key words:  Aluminum stepwedge, digital radiography, radiopacity, root-canal filling material
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用数字x线摄影评价mta基根管填充材料的放射不透明性
目的:本研究的目的是评估一种相对较新的基于矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)的根管填充材料的放射不透明度,并使用数字成像系统将其与目前使用的四种根管填充材料进行比较。方法:采用MTA Fillapex、Adseal、AH Plus、Endomethasone、杜仲胶等根管充填材料。五种不同根管填充材料的标准盘与以毫米为单位校准的铝阶梯楔一起暴露。用于放射照相曝光,存储荧光粉板(尺寸4;5.7x7.6 cm), x光机70kvp, 8ma。物焦距离为30 cm,曝光时间为0.2秒。使用系统自带的软件对被测材料的灰度值进行数字化测量,并与阶梯楔进行对比,求出铝的等效厚度。对数据进行统计学分析,p<0.05为显著水平。结果:所研究材料的透射线值由大到小依次为:AH Plus(9.70)、杜仲胶(6.82)、MTA Fillapex(5.30)、Adseal(3.71)、Endomethasone(3.67)。被测材料的x线平均密度值之间存在统计学差异(p<0.005), AH Plus显示最高值。结论:MTA填充材料是本研究测试材料中第三不透光的根管填充材料。所有评估材料均达到国际标准化组织和美国国家标准协会/美国牙科协会推荐的最低不透射线标准。关键词:铝楔;数字x线摄影;根管充填材料
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elektro Çekim Yöntemi ile Çörek Otu ve Yün Yağı Takviyeli Yara Örtüsü Geliştirilmesi Investigation of Water Permeability of Ultrasonic Seaming on PU Coated Fabrics Nikel Alaşımlarının Farklı Soğutma/Yağlama Koşulları Altında Talaşlı İmalatının Kesme Kuvvetlerine Etkisi: Bir Derleme Çalışması Antibacterial Properties of Polyurethane / Benzalkonium Chloride Nanofibers Effects of Carbon Nanotube-Phosphorus Based Flame Retardant Combinations on Flammability of Polypropylene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1