Association between thoracic epidural block and major complications after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia

K. Onoe, Hiroki Ogata, Takuma Okamoto, H. Okutani, R. Ueki, N. Kariya, T. Tatara, M. Hashimoto, S. Hasegawa, Y. Matsuki, Munetaka Hirose
{"title":"Association between thoracic epidural block and major complications after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia","authors":"K. Onoe, Hiroki Ogata, Takuma Okamoto, H. Okutani, R. Ueki, N. Kariya, T. Tatara, M. Hashimoto, S. Hasegawa, Y. Matsuki, Munetaka Hirose","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2022-103688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction A curative-intent surgical procedure, pleurectomy/decortication, for malignant pleural mesothelioma is accompanied by a high incidence of major postoperative complications. Although epidural block, which suppresses nociception during and after surgery, reportedly has both benefits and disadvantages in terms of outcomes after thoracic surgery for other diseases, the effects of epidural block on major complications after pleurectomy/decortication have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between epidural block and major postoperative complications following pleurectomy/decortication. Methods In a single-institutional observational study, consecutive adult patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication under general anesthesia were enrolled from March 2019 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between perioperative variables and major complications. Next, patients were divided into two groups: general anesthesia with and without epidural block. Incidences of major postoperative complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grades≥III, were compared between groups. Results In all patients enrolled with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II or III (n=99), general anesthesia without epidural block was identified as a sole risk factor for major complications among perioperative variables. The incidence of major complications was 32.3% (95% CI 19.1% to 49.2%) in patients with epidural block (n=34), which was significantly lower than 63.1% (95% CI 50.9% to 73.8%) in patients without epidural block (n=65). In sensitivity analysis in patients with ASA physical status II alone, the same results were obtained. Conclusion Epidural block is likely associated with reduction of the incidence of major complications after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"494 - 499"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction A curative-intent surgical procedure, pleurectomy/decortication, for malignant pleural mesothelioma is accompanied by a high incidence of major postoperative complications. Although epidural block, which suppresses nociception during and after surgery, reportedly has both benefits and disadvantages in terms of outcomes after thoracic surgery for other diseases, the effects of epidural block on major complications after pleurectomy/decortication have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between epidural block and major postoperative complications following pleurectomy/decortication. Methods In a single-institutional observational study, consecutive adult patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication under general anesthesia were enrolled from March 2019 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between perioperative variables and major complications. Next, patients were divided into two groups: general anesthesia with and without epidural block. Incidences of major postoperative complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grades≥III, were compared between groups. Results In all patients enrolled with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II or III (n=99), general anesthesia without epidural block was identified as a sole risk factor for major complications among perioperative variables. The incidence of major complications was 32.3% (95% CI 19.1% to 49.2%) in patients with epidural block (n=34), which was significantly lower than 63.1% (95% CI 50.9% to 73.8%) in patients without epidural block (n=65). In sensitivity analysis in patients with ASA physical status II alone, the same results were obtained. Conclusion Epidural block is likely associated with reduction of the incidence of major complications after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma under general anesthesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸膜硬膜外阻滞与全麻下恶性胸膜间皮瘤胸膜切除/去皮术后主要并发症的关系
恶性胸膜间皮瘤的胸膜切除术/去皮术是一种治疗目的明确的外科手术,其术后主要并发症的发生率很高。据报道,硬膜外阻滞在手术期间和手术后抑制伤害感受,对其他疾病胸外科手术后的结果既有好处也有缺点,但硬膜外阻滞对胸膜切除/去皮术后主要并发症的影响尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是评估硬膜外阻滞与胸膜切除术/去皮术后主要并发症之间的关系。方法在一项单机构观察性研究中,于2019年3月至2021年12月连续招募在全身麻醉下接受胸膜切除术/去皮术的成年患者。采用多变量logistic回归分析确定围手术期变量与主要并发症的关系。接下来,将患者分为两组:全麻加硬膜外阻滞和不加硬膜外阻滞。比较两组术后主要并发症发生率,Clavien-Dindo分级≥III。结果在美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)身体状态II或III的所有患者(n=99)中,在围手术期变量中,无硬膜外阻滞的全身麻醉被确定为主要并发症的唯一危险因素。硬膜外阻滞患者(n=34)的主要并发症发生率为32.3% (95% CI 19.1% ~ 49.2%),显著低于无硬膜外阻滞患者(n=65)的63.1% (95% CI 50.9% ~ 73.8%)。在单独对ASA身体状态为II的患者进行敏感性分析时,得到了相同的结果。结论硬膜外阻滞可降低全身麻醉下恶性胸膜间皮瘤切除/去皮术后主要并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1