Need for Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Women with Prior History of Group B Streptococcus Carriage

{"title":"Need for Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Women with Prior History of Group B Streptococcus Carriage","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jgrm.05.02.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incidence of early onset neonatal GBS(EOGBS) disease in the UK and Ireland is 0.57/1000 births. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) reduces the risk. Previous colonisation is associated with 50% carriage in the current pregnancy. In these women, RCOG recommends IAP with a history of neonatal infection, otherwise offering the option of screening at 35-37 weeks. In Ireland, there is no national consensus on IAP in prior GBS colonisation. Currently at University Hospital Waterford (UHW), all women with prior GBS colonisation receive IAP. Studies examining the use of point-of-care testing have shown reduction in the use of IAP and EOGBS rates. We aimed to examine the screening and IAP administration in maternal prior GBS colonisation and the incidence of GBS in this cohort in UHW. Data was collected retrospectively from laboratory, medical records and electronic patient manager systems. Women who received IAP between 1stJuly 2020 and 31stDecember 2020 were identified. Women who received IAP for current and prior GBS colonisation were included. Women who received IAP for preterm labour, preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and pyrexia in labour were excluded. Ninety-two women with current or prior GBS colonisation received IAP, of which only 15(16.30%) were current and 77(83.69%) were prior GBS colonisation. In women with prior GBS colonisation, 49(63.63%) were screened, 3/49(6.12%) were positive, 28 were not screened. Seventy-eight (84.78%) received benzyl-penicillin. Six (6.52%) received clindamycin. Twenty-two (23.91%) babies were admitted to the Neonatal Unit, however, only one cultured positive for gram-positive cocci. The incidence of EOGBS in this cohort is low. A risk-based approach or point-of-care testing should be considered to reduce unnecessary IAP administration.","PeriodicalId":93778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.05.02.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of early onset neonatal GBS(EOGBS) disease in the UK and Ireland is 0.57/1000 births. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) reduces the risk. Previous colonisation is associated with 50% carriage in the current pregnancy. In these women, RCOG recommends IAP with a history of neonatal infection, otherwise offering the option of screening at 35-37 weeks. In Ireland, there is no national consensus on IAP in prior GBS colonisation. Currently at University Hospital Waterford (UHW), all women with prior GBS colonisation receive IAP. Studies examining the use of point-of-care testing have shown reduction in the use of IAP and EOGBS rates. We aimed to examine the screening and IAP administration in maternal prior GBS colonisation and the incidence of GBS in this cohort in UHW. Data was collected retrospectively from laboratory, medical records and electronic patient manager systems. Women who received IAP between 1stJuly 2020 and 31stDecember 2020 were identified. Women who received IAP for current and prior GBS colonisation were included. Women who received IAP for preterm labour, preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and pyrexia in labour were excluded. Ninety-two women with current or prior GBS colonisation received IAP, of which only 15(16.30%) were current and 77(83.69%) were prior GBS colonisation. In women with prior GBS colonisation, 49(63.63%) were screened, 3/49(6.12%) were positive, 28 were not screened. Seventy-eight (84.78%) received benzyl-penicillin. Six (6.52%) received clindamycin. Twenty-two (23.91%) babies were admitted to the Neonatal Unit, however, only one cultured positive for gram-positive cocci. The incidence of EOGBS in this cohort is low. A risk-based approach or point-of-care testing should be considered to reduce unnecessary IAP administration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有B群链球菌携带史的妇女产时预防抗生素的必要性
早发新生儿GBS(EOGBS)疾病在英国和爱尔兰的发病率为0.57/1000个新生儿。产时抗生素预防(IAP)可降低风险。先前的殖民化与当前妊娠中50%的产率有关。在这些妇女中,RCOG建议在有新生儿感染史的情况下进行IAP,否则可在35-37周进行筛查。在爱尔兰,在以前的GBS殖民中,IAP没有全国共识。目前在沃特福德大学医院(UHW),所有既往有GBS定植的妇女都接受IAP。检查即时检测使用情况的研究表明,IAP和EOGBS的使用率有所降低。我们的目的是检查筛查和IAP给药在母体之前的GBS定植和GBS在UHW队列中的发病率。回顾性地从实验室、医疗记录和电子患者管理系统收集数据。确定了在2020年7月1日至2020年12月31日期间接受IAP的女性。纳入了目前和以前接受过IAP的GBS定殖的妇女。因早产、早产前胎膜破裂和分娩时发热而接受IAP的妇女被排除在外。92名目前或既往有GBS定植的妇女接受了IAP,其中只有15名(16.30%)是目前的,77名(83.69%)是既往的GBS定植。在既往有GBS定植的女性中,49例(63.63%)筛查,3/49(6.12%)阳性,28例未筛查。78例(84.78%)接受苄青霉素治疗。6例(6.52%)接受克林霉素治疗。22例(23.91%)新生儿入住新生儿科,但仅有1例革兰氏阳性球菌培养阳性。EOGBS在该队列中的发病率较低。应考虑采用基于风险的方法或即时检测,以减少不必要的IAP管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delayed Presentation of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome; A Rare Congenital Anomaly: A Case Report and literature Review Prevalence and Determinants of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Burundi: Evidence from 2016-17 Demographic and Health Survey Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Recognizing Infected Patients with Organ Dysfunction & Prediction of Mortality: Cohort Study Prenatal Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Fetal Cardiac Tumors Association of Pharmacy Services with Patient Satisfaction in Public and Private Tertiary Care Hospitals of Rawalpindi And Islamabad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1