Phase transitions in biased opinion dynamics with 2-choices rule

IF 0.7 3区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1017/s0269964823000098
Arpan Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"Phase transitions in biased opinion dynamics with 2-choices rule","authors":"Arpan Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1017/s0269964823000098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We consider a model of binary opinion dynamics where one opinion is inherently “superior” than the other, and social agents exhibit a “bias” toward the superior alternative. Specifically, it is assumed that an agent updates its choice to the superior alternative with probability α > 0 irrespective of its current opinion and opinions of other agents. With probability \n \n \n $1-\\alpha$\n \n , it adopts majority opinion among two randomly sampled neighbors and itself. We are interested in the time it takes for the network to converge to a consensus on the superior alternative. In a complete graph of size n, we show that irrespective of the initial configuration of the network, the average time to reach consensus scales as \n \n \n $\\Theta(n\\,\\log n)$\n \n when the bias parameter α is sufficiently high, that is, \n \n \n $\\alpha \\gt \\alpha_c$\n \n where α\n c\n is a threshold parameter that is uniquely characterized. When the bias is low, that is, when \n \n \n $\\alpha \\in (0,\\alpha_c]$\n \n , we show that the same rate of convergence can only be achieved if the initial proportion of agents with the superior opinion is above certain threshold \n \n \n $p_c(\\alpha)$\n \n . If this is not the case, then we show that the network takes \n \n \n $\\Omega(\\exp(\\Theta(n)))$\n \n time on average to reach consensus.","PeriodicalId":54582,"journal":{"name":"Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269964823000098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We consider a model of binary opinion dynamics where one opinion is inherently “superior” than the other, and social agents exhibit a “bias” toward the superior alternative. Specifically, it is assumed that an agent updates its choice to the superior alternative with probability α > 0 irrespective of its current opinion and opinions of other agents. With probability $1-\alpha$ , it adopts majority opinion among two randomly sampled neighbors and itself. We are interested in the time it takes for the network to converge to a consensus on the superior alternative. In a complete graph of size n, we show that irrespective of the initial configuration of the network, the average time to reach consensus scales as $\Theta(n\,\log n)$ when the bias parameter α is sufficiently high, that is, $\alpha \gt \alpha_c$ where α c is a threshold parameter that is uniquely characterized. When the bias is low, that is, when $\alpha \in (0,\alpha_c]$ , we show that the same rate of convergence can only be achieved if the initial proportion of agents with the superior opinion is above certain threshold $p_c(\alpha)$ . If this is not the case, then we show that the network takes $\Omega(\exp(\Theta(n)))$ time on average to reach consensus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带有2选择规则的偏见意见动态的相变
我们考虑了一个二元意见动态模型,其中一种意见本质上比另一种意见“优越”,社会代理人表现出对优越选择的“偏见”。具体地说,假设一个智能体以α > 0的概率更新其选择,而不考虑它当前的意见和其他智能体的意见。概率为$1-\alpha$,它在两个随机抽样的邻居和它自己之间采用多数意见。我们感兴趣的是网络在更好的替代方案上达成共识所需的时间。在大小为n的完整图中,我们表明,无论网络的初始配置如何,当偏差参数α足够高时,达到共识的平均时间为$\Theta(n\,\log n)$,即$\alpha \gt \alpha_c$,其中α c是唯一表征的阈值参数。当偏差较低时,即$\alpha \in (0,\alpha_c]$,我们表明,只有当具有优越意见的代理的初始比例高于一定阈值$p_c(\alpha)$时,才能实现相同的收敛速度。如果不是这样,那么我们表明网络平均需要$\Omega(\exp(\Theta(n)))$时间来达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary focus of the journal is on stochastic modelling in the physical and engineering sciences, with particular emphasis on queueing theory, reliability theory, inventory theory, simulation, mathematical finance and probabilistic networks and graphs. Papers on analytic properties and related disciplines are also considered, as well as more general papers on applied and computational probability, if appropriate. Readers include academics working in statistics, operations research, computer science, engineering, management science and physical sciences as well as industrial practitioners engaged in telecommunications, computer science, financial engineering, operations research and management science.
期刊最新文献
On the probability of a Pareto record Quantile-based information generating functions and their properties and uses Orderings of extremes among dependent extended Weibull random variables An inequality for log-concave functions and its use in the study of failure rates Discounted cost exponential semi-Markov decision processes with unbounded transition rates: a service rate control problem with impatient customers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1