Supporting exploratory code search with differencing and visualization

Wenjian Liu, Xin Peng, Zhenchang Xing, Junyi Li, Bing Xie, Wenyun Zhao
{"title":"Supporting exploratory code search with differencing and visualization","authors":"Wenjian Liu, Xin Peng, Zhenchang Xing, Junyi Li, Bing Xie, Wenyun Zhao","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2018.8330218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Searching and reusing online code has become a common practice in software development. Two important characteristics of online code have not been carefully considered in current tool support. First, many pieces of online code are largely similar but subtly different. Second, several pieces of code may form complex relations through their differences. These two characteristics make it difficult to properly rank online code to a search query and reduce the efficiency of examining search results. In this paper, we present an exploratory online code search approach that explicitly takes into account the above two characteristics of online code. Given a list of methods returned for a search query, our approach uses clone detection and code differencing techniques to analyze both commonalities and differences among the methods in the search results. It then produces an exploration graph that visualizes the method differences and the relationships of methods through their differences. The exploration graph allows developers to explore search results in a structured view of different method groups present in the search results, and turns implicit code differences into visual cues to help developers navigate the search results. We implement our approach in a web-based tool called CodeNuance. We conduct experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our CodeNuance tool for search results examination, compared with ranked-list and code-clustering based search results examination. We also compare the performance and user behavior differences in using our tool and other exploratory code search tools.","PeriodicalId":6602,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"413 1","pages":"300-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Searching and reusing online code has become a common practice in software development. Two important characteristics of online code have not been carefully considered in current tool support. First, many pieces of online code are largely similar but subtly different. Second, several pieces of code may form complex relations through their differences. These two characteristics make it difficult to properly rank online code to a search query and reduce the efficiency of examining search results. In this paper, we present an exploratory online code search approach that explicitly takes into account the above two characteristics of online code. Given a list of methods returned for a search query, our approach uses clone detection and code differencing techniques to analyze both commonalities and differences among the methods in the search results. It then produces an exploration graph that visualizes the method differences and the relationships of methods through their differences. The exploration graph allows developers to explore search results in a structured view of different method groups present in the search results, and turns implicit code differences into visual cues to help developers navigate the search results. We implement our approach in a web-based tool called CodeNuance. We conduct experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our CodeNuance tool for search results examination, compared with ranked-list and code-clustering based search results examination. We also compare the performance and user behavior differences in using our tool and other exploratory code search tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持探索性代码搜索与差异和可视化
搜索和重用在线代码已经成为软件开发中的一种常见做法。在线代码的两个重要特征在当前的工具支持中没有被仔细考虑。首先,许多在线代码在很大程度上是相似的,但也有细微的不同。第二,几段代码可能通过它们的差异形成复杂的关系。这两个特征使得很难将在线代码正确地排列到搜索查询中,并降低了检查搜索结果的效率。在本文中,我们提出了一种探索性的在线代码搜索方法,该方法明确考虑了在线代码的上述两个特征。给定一个搜索查询返回的方法列表,我们的方法使用克隆检测和代码差异技术来分析搜索结果中方法之间的共性和差异。然后生成一个探索图,将方法差异和方法之间的关系可视化。探索图允许开发人员在搜索结果中呈现的不同方法组的结构化视图中探索搜索结果,并将隐式代码差异转换为可视化提示,以帮助开发人员导航搜索结果。我们在一个名为CodeNuance的基于网络的工具中实现了我们的方法。我们进行了实验来评估我们的CodeNuance工具在搜索结果检查方面的有效性,并与基于排名列表和基于代码聚类的搜索结果检查进行了比较。我们还比较了使用我们的工具和其他探索性代码搜索工具时的性能和用户行为差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the integration of user feedback in automated testing of Android applications The Statechart Workbench: Enabling scalable software event log analysis using process mining Detecting code smells using machine learning techniques: Are we there yet? Classifying stack overflow posts on API issues Re-evaluating method-level bug prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1