Comparative Clinical Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Calcitriol and Calcipotriol in Mild Plaque Psoriasis

Harshal M. Mahajan, G. Deshmukh, D. Dhoot, R. Mamadi, Hanmant Barkate
{"title":"Comparative Clinical Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Calcitriol and Calcipotriol in Mild Plaque Psoriasis","authors":"Harshal M. Mahajan, G. Deshmukh, D. Dhoot, R. Mamadi, Hanmant Barkate","doi":"10.11648/J.IJCD.20200302.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Psoriasis is defined as chronic disease of the skin which is treated by topical drugs, systemic drugs or phototherapy depending on its severity. Vitamin D analogues are also commonly used in psoriasis, and its combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) has shown to have synergistic action leading to more effective control of symptoms of psoriasis as well as decrement in adverse events like skin atrophy associated with prolonged TCS therapy. The present study was undertaken in pursuit of comparative assessment of effectiveness and safety of calcitriol and calcipotriol in patients diagnosed with mild psoriasis. Material and methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective data analysis and comparison between calcitriol and calcipotriol ointment done at 129 dermatology clinics across India after obtaining ethics committee approval. The data charts were identified by generating a list of all patients who were prescribed clobetasol and calcitriol as fixed dose combination for 2 weeks followed by either calcitriol (group 1) or calcipotriol (group 2) for 4 weeks at all clinics, using medical record database. Results: Out of 1076 records, a total of 630 patients met inclusion criteria. Improvement in symptoms was seen in all patients. Improvement in Physician Global assessment Score (PGAS) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI) was seen consistently throughout the treatment period in both the groups, but greater improvement was seen in calcitriol group as compared to calcipotriol group at day 42 (p<0.05). Overall, the adverse effects in calcitriol group were less as compared to calcipotriol group. Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggests that calcitriol offers better effectiveness and safety over calcipotriol in maintenance phase of treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis and also it can serve as better option to maximise the therapeutic effect of topical corticosteroid as a fixed dose combination in acute phase of treatment.","PeriodicalId":15418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"70 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJCD.20200302.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Psoriasis is defined as chronic disease of the skin which is treated by topical drugs, systemic drugs or phototherapy depending on its severity. Vitamin D analogues are also commonly used in psoriasis, and its combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) has shown to have synergistic action leading to more effective control of symptoms of psoriasis as well as decrement in adverse events like skin atrophy associated with prolonged TCS therapy. The present study was undertaken in pursuit of comparative assessment of effectiveness and safety of calcitriol and calcipotriol in patients diagnosed with mild psoriasis. Material and methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective data analysis and comparison between calcitriol and calcipotriol ointment done at 129 dermatology clinics across India after obtaining ethics committee approval. The data charts were identified by generating a list of all patients who were prescribed clobetasol and calcitriol as fixed dose combination for 2 weeks followed by either calcitriol (group 1) or calcipotriol (group 2) for 4 weeks at all clinics, using medical record database. Results: Out of 1076 records, a total of 630 patients met inclusion criteria. Improvement in symptoms was seen in all patients. Improvement in Physician Global assessment Score (PGAS) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI) was seen consistently throughout the treatment period in both the groups, but greater improvement was seen in calcitriol group as compared to calcipotriol group at day 42 (p<0.05). Overall, the adverse effects in calcitriol group were less as compared to calcipotriol group. Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggests that calcitriol offers better effectiveness and safety over calcipotriol in maintenance phase of treatment of mild to moderate psoriasis and also it can serve as better option to maximise the therapeutic effect of topical corticosteroid as a fixed dose combination in acute phase of treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨化三醇与钙化三醇治疗轻度斑块型银屑病疗效及安全性的比较临床评价
简介:牛皮癣被定义为慢性皮肤病,根据其严重程度,可通过局部药物、全身药物或光疗治疗。维生素D类似物也常用于牛皮癣,其与局部皮质类固醇(TCS)联合使用已显示出协同作用,可更有效地控制牛皮癣症状,并减少与长期TCS治疗相关的皮肤萎缩等不良事件。本研究旨在比较骨化三醇和钙化三醇治疗轻度牛皮癣患者的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:这是一项多中心、回顾性数据分析和骨化三醇和钙化三醇软膏的比较,在获得伦理委员会批准后,在印度129个皮肤科诊所进行。数据图表是通过生成所有患者的列表来确定的,这些患者在所有诊所使用病历数据库,使用氯倍他索和骨化三醇作为固定剂量组合使用2周,随后使用骨化三醇(1组)或钙化三醇(2组)使用4周。结果:1076例记录中,630例患者符合纳入标准。所有患者的症状均有改善。在整个治疗期间,两组的医师总体评估评分(PGAS)和牛皮癣面积和严重程度评分(PASI)均有改善,但骨化三醇组在第42天的改善程度高于钙化三醇组(p<0.05)。总的来说,骨化三醇组的不良反应比钙化三醇组要少。结论:骨化三醇在轻中度银屑病治疗维持期的疗效和安全性优于钙化三醇,在急性期治疗中,骨化三醇可作为局部皮质类固醇固定剂量联合用药的最佳选择,使治疗效果最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Acupuncture Therapy on Herpes Zoster: Report of 3 Cases Leukemia Cutis in a Patient with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Case Report Dermatologic Manifestation Of COVID-19: Review Of Case Series Dupilumab: Friend or Foe to Alopecia Areata? A Review Of Erythroid Differentiation Regulator 1 (ERDR1) As A Therapeutic Target In Skin Inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1