Sino-Russian rapprochement and Greater Eurasia: From geopolitical pole to international society?

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Eurasian Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/18793665211000057
A. Lukin, D. Novikov
{"title":"Sino-Russian rapprochement and Greater Eurasia: From geopolitical pole to international society?","authors":"A. Lukin, D. Novikov","doi":"10.1177/18793665211000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can international anarchy be stabilized, if not globally, then at least regionally? Those scholars who give a positive answer usually refer to the North Atlantic community which can be categorized as an international society from the viewpoint of the English school. The emergence of such a community outside the West is traditionally considered hardly possible. However, this article argues that it may already be emerging in Eurasia, with Russia and China being the key drivers of this trend. In the past few years, these two powers have put forward a number of major initiatives aimed at developing transport networks and logistics, and deepening economic and institutional ties between different parts of the continent. These include but are not limited to Eurasian Economic Union, supported by Russia, and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Together, Moscow and Beijing began to form a new platform for security and economic cooperation “from Kaliningrad to Shanghai”—the community of Greater Eurasia. Based on the analysis of the geopolitical logic of these initiatives, this article suggests that a new, non-Western international society may be forming in Eurasia among the states with different political systems and cultures, but common geopolitical aims and fears.","PeriodicalId":39195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eurasian Studies","volume":"252 1","pages":"28 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eurasian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665211000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Can international anarchy be stabilized, if not globally, then at least regionally? Those scholars who give a positive answer usually refer to the North Atlantic community which can be categorized as an international society from the viewpoint of the English school. The emergence of such a community outside the West is traditionally considered hardly possible. However, this article argues that it may already be emerging in Eurasia, with Russia and China being the key drivers of this trend. In the past few years, these two powers have put forward a number of major initiatives aimed at developing transport networks and logistics, and deepening economic and institutional ties between different parts of the continent. These include but are not limited to Eurasian Economic Union, supported by Russia, and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Together, Moscow and Beijing began to form a new platform for security and economic cooperation “from Kaliningrad to Shanghai”—the community of Greater Eurasia. Based on the analysis of the geopolitical logic of these initiatives, this article suggests that a new, non-Western international society may be forming in Eurasia among the states with different political systems and cultures, but common geopolitical aims and fears.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中俄和解与大欧亚:从地缘政治极点到国际社会?
国际无政府状态能否稳定,如果不是全球的,至少是区域的?那些给出肯定答案的学者通常指的是北大西洋共同体,从英语学派的观点来看,北大西洋共同体可以被归类为一个国际社会。传统上认为,在西方之外出现这样一个社区几乎是不可能的。然而,本文认为,它可能已经在欧亚大陆出现,俄罗斯和中国是这一趋势的主要驱动力。在过去几年中,这两个大国提出了一些重大倡议,旨在发展运输网络和物流,加深非洲大陆不同地区之间的经济和体制联系。包括但不限于俄罗斯支持的欧亚经济联盟和中国的“一带一路”倡议。莫斯科和北京一起开始形成一个“从加里宁格勒到上海”的安全和经济合作的新平台——大欧亚共同体。在分析这些倡议背后的地缘政治逻辑的基础上,本文认为欧亚大陆可能正在形成一个新的、非西方的国际社会,这些国家有着不同的政治制度和文化,但有着共同的地缘政治目标和恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eurasian Studies
Journal of Eurasian Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
In the shadow of war: Public opinion in the Baltic states, 2014 and 2021 The curious case of Aistija: Sidelights on Latvian–Lithuanian rapprochement during the 20th century Images of care: Marriage, family making, and the reproduction of the social order in Tajikistan Understanding the impact of social and academic factors on sense of belonging in higher education: A study from the Georgian educational landscape The effect of migration on economic and productivity growth in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1