Clinical Effects of Cannabis Use in First-Episode Acute Psychotic Patients.

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.28401
Burak Akdöner, Umut Baklacı, Özlem Kuman Tunçel, Ebru Aldemir, Hayriye Elbi
{"title":"Clinical Effects of Cannabis Use in First-Episode Acute Psychotic Patients.","authors":"Burak Akdöner, Umut Baklacı, Özlem Kuman Tunçel, Ebru Aldemir, Hayriye Elbi","doi":"10.29399/npa.28401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cannabis is the most widely used illegal psychoactive substance worldwide. Although there are clinical studies examining the differences between psychotic symptoms emerging after cannabis use and non-cannabis-related psychotic symptoms, data are limited in the scientific literature. We aimed to investigate the effects of cannabis use on psychotic symptoms and compare the cognitive function differences between the cannabis-user and non-user groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First-episode psychotic patients were included in the study and divided into two groups based on cannabis use. Participants with cannabis use and without cannabis use were compared in terms of socio-demographic factors, psychotic symptoms, cognitive functions, and childhood trauma. All patients were assessed twice, during recruitment and after treatment for psychotic symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 patients comprising of 18 patients with a history of cannabis use and 20 patients without a history of cannabis use were included. There were significant correlations between cannabis use, and living apart from family and family history of substance abuse. Negative psychotic symptoms were higher in the non-user group. The negative psychotic symptoms improved more significantly after treatment in the non-user group. There was a significant correlation between cannabis use and Stroop Color-Word Test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results give us a chance to argue that psychosis has different features in people with and without a history of cannabis use. These two phenomena could differ in many ways, so different prevention strategies and treatment options should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"49 1","pages":"363-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10709701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.28401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cannabis is the most widely used illegal psychoactive substance worldwide. Although there are clinical studies examining the differences between psychotic symptoms emerging after cannabis use and non-cannabis-related psychotic symptoms, data are limited in the scientific literature. We aimed to investigate the effects of cannabis use on psychotic symptoms and compare the cognitive function differences between the cannabis-user and non-user groups.

Methods: First-episode psychotic patients were included in the study and divided into two groups based on cannabis use. Participants with cannabis use and without cannabis use were compared in terms of socio-demographic factors, psychotic symptoms, cognitive functions, and childhood trauma. All patients were assessed twice, during recruitment and after treatment for psychotic symptoms.

Results: A total of 38 patients comprising of 18 patients with a history of cannabis use and 20 patients without a history of cannabis use were included. There were significant correlations between cannabis use, and living apart from family and family history of substance abuse. Negative psychotic symptoms were higher in the non-user group. The negative psychotic symptoms improved more significantly after treatment in the non-user group. There was a significant correlation between cannabis use and Stroop Color-Word Test scores.

Conclusion: Our results give us a chance to argue that psychosis has different features in people with and without a history of cannabis use. These two phenomena could differ in many ways, so different prevention strategies and treatment options should be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在首发急性精神病患者中使用大麻的临床效果。
导言:大麻是全世界使用最广泛的非法精神活性物质。虽然有临床研究探讨了使用大麻后出现的精神病症状与非大麻相关精神病症状之间的差异,但科学文献中的数据十分有限。我们的目的是调查使用大麻对精神病症状的影响,并比较使用大麻组和不使用大麻组之间认知功能的差异:研究纳入了首发精神病患者,并根据大麻使用情况将其分为两组。在社会人口学因素、精神病症状、认知功能和童年创伤方面,对使用大麻和不使用大麻的参与者进行比较。所有患者均在招募期间和治疗后接受了两次精神病症状评估:共纳入 38 名患者,包括 18 名有大麻使用史的患者和 20 名无大麻使用史的患者。吸食大麻与与家人分开居住和家族药物滥用史之间存在明显的相关性。未使用大麻组患者的阴性精神病症状较重。非使用者组的阴性精神病症状在治疗后得到了更明显的改善。使用大麻与 Stroop 彩色单词测试得分之间存在明显的相关性:我们的研究结果让我们有机会论证,有大麻使用史和没有大麻使用史的人的精神病具有不同的特征。这两种现象可能在许多方面存在差异,因此应考虑不同的预防策略和治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Do heterogenous beliefs drive the US business cycles? Culture and social influence: Evidence from online reviews An experimental comparison of conventional and final offer arbitration Land assembly and negative externalities: An experimental investigation of NIMBY projects The rise and fall of ideas’ popularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1