Race and Racism in Austen Spaces: Jane Austen and Regency Romance's Racist Legacy

Bianca Hernandez-Knight
{"title":"Race and Racism in Austen Spaces: Jane Austen and Regency Romance's Racist Legacy","authors":"Bianca Hernandez-Knight","doi":"10.5038/2157-7129.11.2.1291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jane Austen is a master of genre, and her allusions and direct references in her Juvenilia and Northanger Abbey show that she is not just a satirist, she clearly understood and even appreciated the works she was often making fun of. So why then are people so reluctant to discuss Austen and Regency Romance, a genre directly tied to Austen’s works? Deeper still, why is there avoidance to critically read Georgette Heyer’s work?\n The evolution of Regency-centered fiction cannot be discussed without looking at Heyer, an antisemitic and racist author whose abridged works have worked to overhaul her problematic writing, and someone who has been a gateway into the Regency fiction world for many. When talking about modern Regency-set romances, readers cannot ignore the influence of Austen or Heyer, and doing so would be akin to reading Northanger Abbey without looking up any information on the horrid novels. Certainly readers can enjoy the discussion, but they are missing the scaffolding of the work.\n Tracing the beginnings of Regency romance as a genre, and plotting it through to today in the Bridgerton novels and the Netflix show, it becomes clear that understanding this modern genre and its history is as important to talking about Austen in pop culture as it would be to research the “horrid novels” in order to more deeply understand Northanger Abbey.\n Along with that context, we must also look at the gatekeeping in discussions around romance and Austen in online spaces. Why are discussions so divided and who gets to dictate who we are allowed to talk about in conjunction to Austen? Why is there reluctance to critically read about the issues of the Regency era, but also the ones laid out in the fantasy world Heyer created?","PeriodicalId":30251,"journal":{"name":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.11.2.1291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jane Austen is a master of genre, and her allusions and direct references in her Juvenilia and Northanger Abbey show that she is not just a satirist, she clearly understood and even appreciated the works she was often making fun of. So why then are people so reluctant to discuss Austen and Regency Romance, a genre directly tied to Austen’s works? Deeper still, why is there avoidance to critically read Georgette Heyer’s work? The evolution of Regency-centered fiction cannot be discussed without looking at Heyer, an antisemitic and racist author whose abridged works have worked to overhaul her problematic writing, and someone who has been a gateway into the Regency fiction world for many. When talking about modern Regency-set romances, readers cannot ignore the influence of Austen or Heyer, and doing so would be akin to reading Northanger Abbey without looking up any information on the horrid novels. Certainly readers can enjoy the discussion, but they are missing the scaffolding of the work. Tracing the beginnings of Regency romance as a genre, and plotting it through to today in the Bridgerton novels and the Netflix show, it becomes clear that understanding this modern genre and its history is as important to talking about Austen in pop culture as it would be to research the “horrid novels” in order to more deeply understand Northanger Abbey. Along with that context, we must also look at the gatekeeping in discussions around romance and Austen in online spaces. Why are discussions so divided and who gets to dictate who we are allowed to talk about in conjunction to Austen? Why is there reluctance to critically read about the issues of the Regency era, but also the ones laid out in the fantasy world Heyer created?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥斯汀空间中的种族和种族主义:简·奥斯汀和摄政浪漫的种族主义遗产
简·奥斯汀是体裁大师,她在《少女》和《诺桑觉寺》中的典故和直接引用表明她不仅仅是一个讽刺作家,她清楚地理解甚至欣赏她经常取笑的作品。那么,为什么人们如此不愿意讨论奥斯汀和摄政罗曼史这种与奥斯汀作品直接相关的题材呢?更深层次的问题是,为什么人们回避批判性地阅读乔其特·海耶的作品?要讨论摄政时期小说的演变,就必须看一看海耶。她是一位反犹太主义和种族主义的作家,她的删节作品彻底改变了她的写作问题,对许多人来说,她是进入摄政时期小说世界的门户。在谈论现代摄政时期的爱情故事时,读者不能忽视奥斯汀或海耶的影响,这样做就像在阅读《诺桑觉寺》时没有查找任何关于这些恐怖小说的信息。当然,读者可以享受讨论,但他们错过了工作的框架。追溯摄政爱情作为一种类型的起源,并在布里奇顿小说和Netflix节目中将其贯穿至今,很明显,理解这种现代类型及其历史对于谈论流行文化中的奥斯汀和研究“恐怖小说”以更深入地理解《诺桑觉寺》同样重要。在这种背景下,我们还必须看看网络空间中关于浪漫和奥斯汀的讨论是如何把关的。为什么讨论如此分裂,谁来决定我们可以和奥斯汀一起讨论谁?为什么人们不愿意批判性地阅读摄政时代的问题,也不愿意阅读海耶创造的幻想世界中的问题?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Before I am Quite Forgot": Women’s Critical Literary Biography and the Future Mary Prince’s Undisciplining Lessons: Counter-Narrative and Testimonio in The History Plotting the Plantationocene with The History of Mary Prince Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy Review of Figurations of the Feminine, by Siobhán McIlvanney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1