Social support is associated with reduced stigma and shame in a sample of rural and small urban adults in methadone treatment

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-24 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2022.2101640
Michael J. Broman, E. Pasman, Suzanne Brown, Jamey J. Lister, Elizabeth Agius, Stella M. Resko
{"title":"Social support is associated with reduced stigma and shame in a sample of rural and small urban adults in methadone treatment","authors":"Michael J. Broman, E. Pasman, Suzanne Brown, Jamey J. Lister, Elizabeth Agius, Stella M. Resko","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2022.2101640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Social support from family, friends, and others promotes retention, decreased substance use, and other positive outcomes for people in substance use treatment. Methadone treatment-related stigma makes social support vital for clients. Little is known about the relationships between stigma, shame, and social support for methadone treatment clients in rural and small urban communities. This study examines these relationships among such clients at an opioid treatment program (OTP) in Michigan. Methods Adults (N = 267) at the OTP completed a web-based survey, including measures of general social support, friend support, demographic variables, opioid use-related shame, frequency of hearing negative comments about methadone treatment, past-year opioid use, and other variables not included in the present analysis. Multiple regression was used to examine associations between general social support (model 1), friend support (model 2) and other included variables. Results Half of the participants (48.3%) reported past-year opioid use. In multiple regression analyses, male gender was inversely associated with general social support. Opioid use-related shame and experiencing treatment-related stigma were inversely associated with general social support and friend support. Conclusions This study adds to the methadone treatment literature by highlighting how shame and stigma might be reduced amongst methadone treatment clients. Greater social support may reduce shame and stigma, making favorable treatment outcomes more likely. Clients with greater opioid-use-related shame and who more frequently experience treatment-related stigma may be particularly vulnerable and need additional supports to maintain recovery. Interventions to enhance support should thus address shame and stigma.","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2101640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Background Social support from family, friends, and others promotes retention, decreased substance use, and other positive outcomes for people in substance use treatment. Methadone treatment-related stigma makes social support vital for clients. Little is known about the relationships between stigma, shame, and social support for methadone treatment clients in rural and small urban communities. This study examines these relationships among such clients at an opioid treatment program (OTP) in Michigan. Methods Adults (N = 267) at the OTP completed a web-based survey, including measures of general social support, friend support, demographic variables, opioid use-related shame, frequency of hearing negative comments about methadone treatment, past-year opioid use, and other variables not included in the present analysis. Multiple regression was used to examine associations between general social support (model 1), friend support (model 2) and other included variables. Results Half of the participants (48.3%) reported past-year opioid use. In multiple regression analyses, male gender was inversely associated with general social support. Opioid use-related shame and experiencing treatment-related stigma were inversely associated with general social support and friend support. Conclusions This study adds to the methadone treatment literature by highlighting how shame and stigma might be reduced amongst methadone treatment clients. Greater social support may reduce shame and stigma, making favorable treatment outcomes more likely. Clients with greater opioid-use-related shame and who more frequently experience treatment-related stigma may be particularly vulnerable and need additional supports to maintain recovery. Interventions to enhance support should thus address shame and stigma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受美沙酮治疗的农村和小城市成年人样本中,社会支持与减少耻辱和羞耻感有关
来自家庭、朋友和其他人的社会支持促进了药物使用治疗患者的保留、减少了药物使用和其他积极结果。与美沙酮治疗相关的耻辱使得社会支持对客户至关重要。对于农村和小城市社区美沙酮治疗客户的污名、羞耻感和社会支持之间的关系知之甚少。本研究考察了密歇根州阿片类药物治疗项目(OTP)中此类客户之间的这些关系。方法OTP的成人(N = 267)完成了一项基于网络的调查,包括一般社会支持、朋友支持、人口统计变量、阿片类药物使用相关羞耻感、听到美沙酮治疗负面评论的频率、过去一年的阿片类药物使用以及其他未包括在本分析中的变量。多元回归检验一般社会支持(模型1)、朋友支持(模型2)与其他纳入变量之间的关系。结果一半的参与者(48.3%)报告过去一年使用阿片类药物。在多元回归分析中,男性性别与一般社会支持呈负相关。阿片类药物使用相关的羞耻感和经历与治疗相关的耻辱与一般社会支持和朋友支持呈负相关。结论:本研究通过强调如何减少美沙酮治疗患者的羞耻感和耻辱感,增加了美沙酮治疗文献。更大的社会支持可能会减少羞耻感和污名,使良好的治疗结果更有可能。阿片类药物使用相关羞耻感更严重和更经常经历治疗相关耻辱的客户可能特别脆弱,需要额外的支持来维持康复。因此,加强支持的干预措施应解决羞耻和污名化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Can ‘justified disapproval’ be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required Do older adults drink alcohol whilst taking alcohol-interactive medication? Prevalence and ten-year mortality risk: findings from the UK Whitehall II cohort study Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1