Study on the Effect of Oxygenated Fuels on Emissions Characteristics: A Comparative Study between Compression Ignition and Spark Ignition Engines

Lennox Siwale, R. J. Kashinga, S. Chama, J. Siame, Á. Bereczky
{"title":"Study on the Effect of Oxygenated Fuels on Emissions Characteristics: A Comparative Study between Compression Ignition and Spark Ignition Engines","authors":"Lennox Siwale, R. J. Kashinga, S. Chama, J. Siame, Á. Bereczky","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nicb/v3/3996f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely argued that use of petroleum is one of the biggest contributors to environment degradation. In this study, burning of oxygenated fuel blends in diesel and gasoline engines is investigated with particular attention to emissions. The study focus was twofold; firstly, to determine the extent by which emissions of NOx, uHC and CO are increased or reduced for various loads in BMEP. And secondly to compare the emissions between the two engines. \nIn the gasoline engine, 20% methanol was blended with 80% gasoline (M20), while a blend of 20% n-butanol and 80% diesel (B20) was considered in the diesel engine. The gasoline engine was a naturally aspirated Suzuki RS-416 1.6L engine type and the diesel engine was a 1Z type, 1.9L Turbo-Direct injection (TDI). Results showed that NOx emissions increased with an increasing brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) for diesel fuel (DF) but was slightly lower than the blend B20 at 50 and 75% load; whereas using M20, NOx reduced in reference to gasoline fuel (GF) but was four times higher than that obtained in diesel engine. Firing B20 diminished the quality of unburned hydrocarbons (uHC) emissions in diesel engine based on the reference fuel DF. The range of emissions of uHC however was far less in the diesel engine than in the gasoline engine: 10-60 ppm and 600 to 700 ppm respectively. M20 reduced uHc concentration more than the GF above 25% BMEP. The concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) increased more for M20 than GF. Similarly, emission concentration of CO in B20 increased relative to DF. Exhaust gases temperature (EGT) was lower for all oxygenated blends, M20 and B20,  than for GF and DF.","PeriodicalId":19128,"journal":{"name":"New Innovations in Chemistry and Biochemistry Vol. 3","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Innovations in Chemistry and Biochemistry Vol. 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nicb/v3/3996f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely argued that use of petroleum is one of the biggest contributors to environment degradation. In this study, burning of oxygenated fuel blends in diesel and gasoline engines is investigated with particular attention to emissions. The study focus was twofold; firstly, to determine the extent by which emissions of NOx, uHC and CO are increased or reduced for various loads in BMEP. And secondly to compare the emissions between the two engines. In the gasoline engine, 20% methanol was blended with 80% gasoline (M20), while a blend of 20% n-butanol and 80% diesel (B20) was considered in the diesel engine. The gasoline engine was a naturally aspirated Suzuki RS-416 1.6L engine type and the diesel engine was a 1Z type, 1.9L Turbo-Direct injection (TDI). Results showed that NOx emissions increased with an increasing brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) for diesel fuel (DF) but was slightly lower than the blend B20 at 50 and 75% load; whereas using M20, NOx reduced in reference to gasoline fuel (GF) but was four times higher than that obtained in diesel engine. Firing B20 diminished the quality of unburned hydrocarbons (uHC) emissions in diesel engine based on the reference fuel DF. The range of emissions of uHC however was far less in the diesel engine than in the gasoline engine: 10-60 ppm and 600 to 700 ppm respectively. M20 reduced uHc concentration more than the GF above 25% BMEP. The concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) increased more for M20 than GF. Similarly, emission concentration of CO in B20 increased relative to DF. Exhaust gases temperature (EGT) was lower for all oxygenated blends, M20 and B20,  than for GF and DF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含氧燃料对排放特性的影响研究:压缩点火与火花点火发动机的比较研究
人们普遍认为石油的使用是造成环境退化的最大原因之一。在这项研究中,燃烧含氧燃料混合物在柴油和汽油发动机进行了调查,特别注意排放。研究的重点是双重的;首先,确定BMEP中不同负荷下NOx、uHC和CO排放量增加或减少的程度。第二,比较两种发动机的排放。在汽油机中,20%的甲醇与80%的汽油(M20)混合,而在柴油机中,20%的正丁醇与80%的柴油(B20)混合。汽油发动机是自然吸气的铃木RS-416 1.6L发动机型,柴油发动机是1Z型,1.9L涡轮直喷(TDI)。结果表明:柴油机(DF)的NOx排放量随着制动平均有效压力(BMEP)的增加而增加,但在50%和75%负荷时略低于混合燃料B20;而使用M20,氮氧化物相对于汽油燃料(GF)有所减少,但比柴油发动机高出四倍。在参考燃料DF的基础上,使用B20降低了柴油发动机未燃烃(uHC)排放的质量。然而,柴油发动机的uHC排放范围远小于汽油发动机,分别为10-60 ppm和600 - 700 ppm。在25% BMEP以上,M20比GF更能降低uHc浓度。M20的一氧化碳(CO)浓度增加幅度大于GF。B20中CO的排放浓度也相对于DF增加。M20和B20的废气温度(EGT)均低于GF和DF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determining the Physicochemical Parameters of Soil and Groundwater in Kaltungo LGA, Gombe State, Nigeria Mechanical Properties of Composite Material Based on Polypropylene and Vietnamese Rice Husk Filler: Experimental Investigation Study on the Effect of Oxygenated Fuels on Emissions Characteristics: A Comparative Study between Compression Ignition and Spark Ignition Engines Development of High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Ambroxol, Roxithromycin and Serratiopeptidase in Combined Tablet Dosage Forms Sialic Acid and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1