{"title":"Travels in Deleuzean Time: Virtual Pilgrimage, Temporal Paradox, and the Newberry and Bicester Stacions of Rome","authors":"Logan Quigley","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2022.2070366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Extant in nine manuscripts, the fourteenth-century poem The Stacions of Rome is often relegated to the dustbin of pilgrimage propaganda. Turning to its presence in two understudied manuscripts, Newberry Case MS 32 and National Archives PRO SC 6/956/5 (known as the “Bicester” roll), this article proceeds from C. David Benson’s recent argument that the Stacions should be reconsidered within the larger tradition of medieval imaginative travel in order to explore the relationship between the manuscripts’ texts and material surfaces. Through the production of temporal paradox, created between the Stacions’ spatiotemporal details and the physical rolling action of manipulating the manuscripts, the Newberry and Bicester rolls offer their readers an experience of reality that moves the reader outside the step of typical human temporal understanding. This process is most legible when considered through the lens of Gilles Deleuze’s theory of bipartite time, as laid out in The Logic of Sense ([1969] 1990), and reveals valuable lessons for understanding the genre with respect to the relationship between imagined time and space. When read as tools for vicarious travel, in other words, the Newberry and Bicester Stacions demonstrate how the collision of dueling temporal orders can help to produce the effect of virtual pilgrimage.","PeriodicalId":40762,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria Classica","volume":"30 1","pages":"148 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2022.2070366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Extant in nine manuscripts, the fourteenth-century poem The Stacions of Rome is often relegated to the dustbin of pilgrimage propaganda. Turning to its presence in two understudied manuscripts, Newberry Case MS 32 and National Archives PRO SC 6/956/5 (known as the “Bicester” roll), this article proceeds from C. David Benson’s recent argument that the Stacions should be reconsidered within the larger tradition of medieval imaginative travel in order to explore the relationship between the manuscripts’ texts and material surfaces. Through the production of temporal paradox, created between the Stacions’ spatiotemporal details and the physical rolling action of manipulating the manuscripts, the Newberry and Bicester rolls offer their readers an experience of reality that moves the reader outside the step of typical human temporal understanding. This process is most legible when considered through the lens of Gilles Deleuze’s theory of bipartite time, as laid out in The Logic of Sense ([1969] 1990), and reveals valuable lessons for understanding the genre with respect to the relationship between imagined time and space. When read as tools for vicarious travel, in other words, the Newberry and Bicester Stacions demonstrate how the collision of dueling temporal orders can help to produce the effect of virtual pilgrimage.
14世纪的诗作《罗马驿站》现存九份手稿,却经常被扔进朝圣宣传的垃圾箱。本文从C. David Benson最近的观点出发,转向两份未被充分研究的手稿——Newberry Case MS 32和国家档案馆PRO SC 6/956/5(被称为“比斯特”卷)——它的存在,即应该在中世纪想象旅行的更大传统中重新考虑Stacions,以探索手稿文本和材料表面之间的关系。通过时间悖论的产生,在斯泰康夫妇的时空细节和操纵手稿的物理滚动动作之间产生,纽伯里和比斯特的滚动为读者提供了一种现实的体验,使读者超越了典型的人类时间理解的步骤。通过吉尔·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)在《感觉的逻辑》(the Logic of Sense)([1969] 1990)中提出的双部时间理论,这一过程最为清晰可辨,并揭示了从想象的时间和空间之间的关系方面理解这一类型的宝贵经验。换句话说,当人们把纽伯里车站和比斯特车站当作替代旅行的工具来阅读时,它们展示了相互冲突的时间秩序如何有助于产生虚拟朝圣的效果。