María Gonzalez-Moreno, Carlos Monfort-Vinuesa, Antonio Piñas-Mesa, Esther Rincon
{"title":"Digital Technologies to Provide Humanization in the Education of the Healthcare Workforce: A Systematic Review","authors":"María Gonzalez-Moreno, Carlos Monfort-Vinuesa, Antonio Piñas-Mesa, Esther Rincon","doi":"10.3390/technologies11040088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The need to incentivize the humanization of healthcare providers coincides with the development of a more technological approach to medicine, which gives rise to depersonalization when treating patients. Currently, there is a culture of humanization that reflects the awareness of health professionals, patients, and policy makers, although it is unknown if there are university curricula incorporating specific skills in humanization, or what these may include. Therefore, the objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to identify what type of education in humanization is provided to university students of Health Sciences using digital technologies; and (2) determine the strengths and weaknesses of this education. The authors propose a curriculum focusing on undergraduate students to strengthen the humanization skills of future health professionals, including digital health strategies. Methods: A systematic review, based on the scientific literature published in EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, over the last decade (2012–2022), was carried out in November 2022. The keywords used were “humanization of care” and “humanization of healthcare” combined both with and without “students”. Results: A total of 475 articles were retrieved, of which 6 met the inclusion criteria and were subsequently analyzed, involving a total of 295 students. Three of them (50%) were qualitative studies, while the other three (50%) involved mixed methods. Only one of the studies (16.7%) included digital health strategies to train humanization. Meanwhile, another study (16.7%) measured the level of humanization after training. Conclusions: There is a clear lack of empirically tested university curricula that combine education in humanization and digital technology for future health professionals. Greater focus on the training of future health professionals is needed, in order to guarantee that they begin their professional careers with the precept of medical humanities as a basis.","PeriodicalId":22341,"journal":{"name":"Technologies","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11040088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The need to incentivize the humanization of healthcare providers coincides with the development of a more technological approach to medicine, which gives rise to depersonalization when treating patients. Currently, there is a culture of humanization that reflects the awareness of health professionals, patients, and policy makers, although it is unknown if there are university curricula incorporating specific skills in humanization, or what these may include. Therefore, the objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to identify what type of education in humanization is provided to university students of Health Sciences using digital technologies; and (2) determine the strengths and weaknesses of this education. The authors propose a curriculum focusing on undergraduate students to strengthen the humanization skills of future health professionals, including digital health strategies. Methods: A systematic review, based on the scientific literature published in EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, over the last decade (2012–2022), was carried out in November 2022. The keywords used were “humanization of care” and “humanization of healthcare” combined both with and without “students”. Results: A total of 475 articles were retrieved, of which 6 met the inclusion criteria and were subsequently analyzed, involving a total of 295 students. Three of them (50%) were qualitative studies, while the other three (50%) involved mixed methods. Only one of the studies (16.7%) included digital health strategies to train humanization. Meanwhile, another study (16.7%) measured the level of humanization after training. Conclusions: There is a clear lack of empirically tested university curricula that combine education in humanization and digital technology for future health professionals. Greater focus on the training of future health professionals is needed, in order to guarantee that they begin their professional careers with the precept of medical humanities as a basis.
目标:鼓励医疗保健提供者人性化的需要与更加技术化的医学方法的发展相吻合,这在治疗患者时引起了去人格化。目前,有一种人性化文化反映了卫生专业人员、患者和决策者的意识,尽管尚不清楚是否有大学课程纳入了人性化的具体技能,或者这些技能可能包括什么。因此,本研究的目的如下:(1)确定使用数字技术对健康科学大学学生提供何种类型的人性化教育;(2)确定这种教育的优势和劣势。作者提出了一种以本科生为重点的课程,以加强未来卫生专业人员的人性化技能,包括数字卫生战略。方法:于2022年11月对近十年(2012-2022)在EBSCO、Ovid、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science上发表的科学文献进行系统综述。使用的关键词是“人性化护理”和“人性化医疗”,结合或不结合“学生”。结果:共检索到文献475篇,其中符合纳入标准的文献6篇进行分析,共涉及295名学生。其中3项(50%)为定性研究,另外3项(50%)采用混合方法。只有一项研究(16.7%)纳入了培训人性化的数字卫生战略。同时,另一项研究(16.7%)测量了训练后的人性化水平。结论:显然缺乏经过实证检验的大学课程,将人性化教育与面向未来卫生专业人员的数字技术相结合。需要更加注重培训未来的保健专业人员,以保证他们以医学人文原则为基础开始其职业生涯。