Images of China in the Australian press: Time for new frames and new readings of old frames to broaden the horizons of framing analysis?

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Media International Australia Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1177/1329878x231193906
Runping Zhu, Wei-yi Hou, R. Krever
{"title":"Images of China in the Australian press: Time for new frames and new readings of old frames to broaden the horizons of framing analysis?","authors":"Runping Zhu, Wei-yi Hou, R. Krever","doi":"10.1177/1329878x231193906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central to the study of the persuasive powers of media messaging is framing theory, an explanation of how the press presents stories through specific frames to both present information and influence readers' views on the subject matter. Drawing on a case study of news reports in the Australian press of China's one-child policy, this article shows how two additions to traditional news frame analysis drawn from related disciplines may contribute to our understanding of the impact of journalism on Australians’ views of the world and themselves. The first is a consideration of the ‘self-reflective’ frames embedded in frames of other countries that deliberately imply the presumed superiority of Australian culture. The second is the addition of a new ‘social and cultural attributes’ issue frame used in news to ascribe factual news events in another country to supposed social or cultural attributes of the society in which the stories arise.","PeriodicalId":46880,"journal":{"name":"Media International Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media International Australia","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x231193906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central to the study of the persuasive powers of media messaging is framing theory, an explanation of how the press presents stories through specific frames to both present information and influence readers' views on the subject matter. Drawing on a case study of news reports in the Australian press of China's one-child policy, this article shows how two additions to traditional news frame analysis drawn from related disciplines may contribute to our understanding of the impact of journalism on Australians’ views of the world and themselves. The first is a consideration of the ‘self-reflective’ frames embedded in frames of other countries that deliberately imply the presumed superiority of Australian culture. The second is the addition of a new ‘social and cultural attributes’ issue frame used in news to ascribe factual news events in another country to supposed social or cultural attributes of the society in which the stories arise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚媒体中的中国形象:新框架和旧框架的新解读,拓宽框架分析的视野?
研究媒体信息说服力的核心是框架理论,它解释了媒体如何通过特定的框架呈现故事,以呈现信息并影响读者对主题的看法。本文以澳大利亚媒体对中国独生子女政策的新闻报道为例,展示了从相关学科中提取的传统新闻框架分析的两个补充如何有助于我们理解新闻对澳大利亚人对世界和自己的看法的影响。首先是对其他国家框架中嵌入的“自我反思”框架的考虑,这些框架故意暗示了澳大利亚文化的假定优势。第二个是在新闻中增加了一个新的“社会和文化属性”问题框架,将另一个国家的事实新闻事件归因于故事发生所在社会的假定社会或文化属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
AANZCA2023 Conference Special Issue: Introduction Digital Racism and Antiracism Toward Asian and Muslim Communities During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Australian Experience What audiences do with news: a broader definition of news consumption Wellness communities and vaccine hesitancy Making public or quiet listening? Media logics and public inquiries into the abuse of children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1