{"title":"The ethics of poetic expression in Emmanuel Lévinas and Maurice Blanchot","authors":"Berta Galofré Claret","doi":"10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lévinas believed that Blanchot identified artistic inspiration with his understanding of the il y a, that is, an inauthentic attitude toward life and the Other. Lévinas, who tried to overcome the neutrality of the il y a, criticised Blanchot’s desire to establish ethics as a prima philosophia. Lévinas asked himself in what way the artwork could give access to the ethical, which is why he explored the relationship between expression and responsibility. He concluded that poetic speaking was excluded from his understanding of ethical language. Therefore, Lévinas was against poetic activity, in ethical terms, because poetic activity (dis)possessed the subject/artist in such a way that the creator was not able to control his writing, which converted art into the worst kind of irresponsibility. This paper will focus on Lévinas’ first aesthetic period, and on the ideas collected in the essay La Réalité et son ombre, published in 1948.","PeriodicalId":53829,"journal":{"name":"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enrahonar-Quaderns de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lévinas believed that Blanchot identified artistic inspiration with his understanding of the il y a, that is, an inauthentic attitude toward life and the Other. Lévinas, who tried to overcome the neutrality of the il y a, criticised Blanchot’s desire to establish ethics as a prima philosophia. Lévinas asked himself in what way the artwork could give access to the ethical, which is why he explored the relationship between expression and responsibility. He concluded that poetic speaking was excluded from his understanding of ethical language. Therefore, Lévinas was against poetic activity, in ethical terms, because poetic activity (dis)possessed the subject/artist in such a way that the creator was not able to control his writing, which converted art into the worst kind of irresponsibility. This paper will focus on Lévinas’ first aesthetic period, and on the ideas collected in the essay La Réalité et son ombre, published in 1948.
l vinas认为,布朗肖将艺术灵感与他对世界的理解,即对生活和他者的一种不真实的态度联系在一起。试图克服《自然》中立性的lsamvinas批评了Blanchot将伦理学确立为首要哲学的愿望。l vinas问自己,艺术作品可以以何种方式进入伦理,这就是为什么他探索表达与责任之间的关系。他的结论是,他对伦理语言的理解排除了诗意的表达。因此,从伦理的角度来看,l vinas反对诗歌活动,因为诗歌活动以这样一种方式占有主题/艺术家,创作者无法控制他的写作,这将艺术变成了最糟糕的不负责任的行为。这篇论文将集中讨论伊姆斯的第一个美学时期,以及他在1948年发表的论文《伊姆斯的人生》中收集的观点。