Uses and functions of conceptual metaphor in pedagogical meditation discourse

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Estudios de Linguistica-Universidad de Alicante-ELUA Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.14198/elua.22349
Antonio-José Silvestre-López
{"title":"Uses and functions of conceptual metaphor in pedagogical meditation discourse","authors":"Antonio-José Silvestre-López","doi":"10.14198/elua.22349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In mindfulness and meditation instructional contexts, conceptual metaphor is a powerful facilitator of intersubjective communication about inner events and first-person experiences. Previous studies in meditation discourse have described space as a productive source domain that is used by meditation teachers to characterise metaphorically inner events and abstract concepts related to the meditative practice (Silvestre-López 2019, 2020). This study examines the discourse manifestations of the space source domain used to metaphorically characterise the most representative metaphorical topics (targets) in a corpus of introductory talks about meditation addressed to an audience of non-expert meditators. The analysis is sensitive to the communicative dimension of the use of metaphors in that it distinguishes between non-deliberate and deliberate uses (Steen 2015) and considers the functions they fulfil in discourse (Semino 2008; Goatly 2011). The corpus was analysed qualitatively following a bottom-up approach. Metaphor identification was carried out using DMIP (Reijnierse et al. 2018). Target and source domain coding was done with the help of dictionary information and the domains already identified in a metaphor compendium created in previous meditation discourse analyses (see Coll-Florit & Climent 2019; Silvestre-López & Navarro 2017; Silvestre-López 2020). This approach allowed different layers of domain specificity to be unveiled, with remarkable differences found between non-deliberate and deliberate metaphor use. Among them, differences in degree of source domain granularity (Langacker 2008) ranging from vaguer notions like undefined space or spaciousness to conceptually richer and finer-grained scenarios like the home and shelter, ocean, landscape, or sky models. The speakers were found to use these source domains consistently with explanatory purposes (explanatory function) to help their audience reconceptualise some of the most frequent target topics in their talks (e.g., the present moment, the meditator, the mind, awareness, or meditation) from more mindfully-oriented perspectives, hence allowing to become aware of and get rid of potential misconceptions. Deliberate uses proved particularly useful in promoting understanding through reconceptualisation, which was in turn facilitated by the vivid imagery evoked through detailed elaborations of source-domain scenery. Besides ideational functions, deliberate metaphors were also found to facilitate positive attitudinal changes towards the practice, as well as to provide for argument structuring and create textual cohesion. Overall, non-deliberate and deliberate uses were found to combine in the speakers’ production to aid them in skilfully achieving their own communicative intentions, which underscores the need for further studies that explore potential ways of applying similar findings to real meditation practice, and in instructional settings.","PeriodicalId":40982,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Linguistica-Universidad de Alicante-ELUA","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Linguistica-Universidad de Alicante-ELUA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/elua.22349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In mindfulness and meditation instructional contexts, conceptual metaphor is a powerful facilitator of intersubjective communication about inner events and first-person experiences. Previous studies in meditation discourse have described space as a productive source domain that is used by meditation teachers to characterise metaphorically inner events and abstract concepts related to the meditative practice (Silvestre-López 2019, 2020). This study examines the discourse manifestations of the space source domain used to metaphorically characterise the most representative metaphorical topics (targets) in a corpus of introductory talks about meditation addressed to an audience of non-expert meditators. The analysis is sensitive to the communicative dimension of the use of metaphors in that it distinguishes between non-deliberate and deliberate uses (Steen 2015) and considers the functions they fulfil in discourse (Semino 2008; Goatly 2011). The corpus was analysed qualitatively following a bottom-up approach. Metaphor identification was carried out using DMIP (Reijnierse et al. 2018). Target and source domain coding was done with the help of dictionary information and the domains already identified in a metaphor compendium created in previous meditation discourse analyses (see Coll-Florit & Climent 2019; Silvestre-López & Navarro 2017; Silvestre-López 2020). This approach allowed different layers of domain specificity to be unveiled, with remarkable differences found between non-deliberate and deliberate metaphor use. Among them, differences in degree of source domain granularity (Langacker 2008) ranging from vaguer notions like undefined space or spaciousness to conceptually richer and finer-grained scenarios like the home and shelter, ocean, landscape, or sky models. The speakers were found to use these source domains consistently with explanatory purposes (explanatory function) to help their audience reconceptualise some of the most frequent target topics in their talks (e.g., the present moment, the meditator, the mind, awareness, or meditation) from more mindfully-oriented perspectives, hence allowing to become aware of and get rid of potential misconceptions. Deliberate uses proved particularly useful in promoting understanding through reconceptualisation, which was in turn facilitated by the vivid imagery evoked through detailed elaborations of source-domain scenery. Besides ideational functions, deliberate metaphors were also found to facilitate positive attitudinal changes towards the practice, as well as to provide for argument structuring and create textual cohesion. Overall, non-deliberate and deliberate uses were found to combine in the speakers’ production to aid them in skilfully achieving their own communicative intentions, which underscores the need for further studies that explore potential ways of applying similar findings to real meditation practice, and in instructional settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念隐喻在教学冥想语篇中的使用和功能
在正念和冥想教学情境中,概念隐喻是关于内在事件和第一人称体验的主体间交流的有力促进者。先前关于冥想话语的研究将空间描述为一个生产性源域,冥想教师用它来隐喻地描述与冥想练习相关的内在事件和抽象概念(Silvestre-López 2019, 2020)。本研究考察了空间源域的话语表现形式,用于隐喻性地描述针对非专家冥想听众的关于冥想的介绍性谈话语料库中最具代表性的隐喻主题(目标)。该分析对隐喻使用的交际维度很敏感,因为它区分了非故意和故意的使用(Steen 2015),并考虑了它们在话语中履行的功能(Semino 2008;山羊2011)。语料库按照自下而上的方法进行定性分析。隐喻识别使用dip进行(Reijnierse et al. 2018)。目标和源域编码是在字典信息的帮助下完成的,并且在之前的冥想话语分析中创建的隐喻纲要中已经确定了域(参见Coll-Florit & Climent 2019;Silvestre-López & Navarro 2017;Silvestre-Lopez 2020)。这种方法揭示了不同层次的领域特异性,在非故意和故意的隐喻使用之间发现了显著的差异。其中,源域粒度程度的差异(Langacker 2008)从模糊的概念(如未定义的空间或空间)到概念更丰富、粒度更细的场景(如家庭和住所、海洋、景观或天空模型)不等。研究发现,演讲者使用这些源域与解释目的(解释功能)一致,以帮助听众从更专注的角度重新概念化他们演讲中一些最常见的目标主题(例如,当下,冥想者,思想,意识或冥想),从而允许意识到并摆脱潜在的误解。经过深思熟虑的使用被证明在通过重新概念化来促进理解方面特别有用,这反过来又通过对源域风景的详细阐述而引起的生动形象得到了促进。除了概念功能外,刻意的隐喻还有助于促进对实践的积极态度改变,并提供论点结构和创造语篇衔接。总的来说,非刻意和刻意的使用被发现结合在说话者的生产中,帮助他们熟练地实现自己的交流意图,这强调了进一步研究的必要性,探索将类似发现应用于真正的冥想练习和教学环境的潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Reseña del libro: Vela Delfa, Cristina y Cantamutto, Lucía (2021). Los emojis en la interacción digital escrita A vueltas con la oposición imperfecto / pretérito perfecto simple. Ventajas descriptivas y pedagógicas de un enfoque temporal-epistémico Riqueza léxica en la producción escrita en español de alumnos chinos: un estudio basado en la teoría de los sistemas dinámicos complejos La dependencia sintáctica y la correlación temporal como valores definitorios de las formas verbales en la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera. El caso del pretérito perfecto de subjuntivo Los valores del pretérito perfecto compuesto y del simple en las áreas geográficas del español: variación diatópica y tratamiento en ELE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1