Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for assessing neovascularization of carotid atherosclerotic plaque

A. Evdokimenko, A. Chechetkin, L. D. Druina, M. Tanashyan
{"title":"Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for assessing neovascularization of carotid atherosclerotic plaque","authors":"A. Evdokimenko, A. Chechetkin, L. D. Druina, M. Tanashyan","doi":"10.24075/brsmu.2019.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neovascularization of a carotid atherosclerotic plaque (AP) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a widely used method for imaging intraplaque neovascularization in vivo. Unfortunately, there are no standardized guidelines for CEUS interpretation. The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable method for CEUS-based assessment of AP neovascularization. Seventy-eight AP were removed during carotid endarterectomy in 73 patients, of whom 5 had AP on both sides, and examined morphologically. All patients underwent preoperative duplex scanning and CEUS; Sonovue was used as a contrast agent. AP neovascularization was assessed on a 4-grade visual scale and with 3 different quantitative methods using QLAB software. On the visual scale (method 1), poorly (37%) and moderately (51%) vascularized plaques were the most common. Quantitative analysis (data were presented as Me (Q1; Q3)) revealed that the number of blood vessels per 1 cm2 of the plaque (method 2) was 16 (10; 26), the ratio of the total vessel area to the plaque area (method 3) was 6% (3; 9), and AP ROI (method 4) was 2.6 dB (1.8; 4.1). Significant correlations were demonstrated between the results produced by method 2 and method 3 (р < 0.0001), method 3 and method 2 (p = 0.0006), and between pathomorphological findings and the results produced by methods 1–3, especially method 2 (p < 0.004). AP ROI brightness did not correlate with other results. The presence of hyperechoic components (calcifications) in AP dramatically reduced the reliability of US-based intraplaque neovascularization assessment. The most accurate CEUS-based quantitative method for assessing intraplaque neovascularization is estimation of blood vessel number per 1 cm2 of the plaque.","PeriodicalId":90498,"journal":{"name":"Exosomes and microvesicles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exosomes and microvesicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2019.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neovascularization of a carotid atherosclerotic plaque (AP) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a widely used method for imaging intraplaque neovascularization in vivo. Unfortunately, there are no standardized guidelines for CEUS interpretation. The aim of this study was to identify the most reliable method for CEUS-based assessment of AP neovascularization. Seventy-eight AP were removed during carotid endarterectomy in 73 patients, of whom 5 had AP on both sides, and examined morphologically. All patients underwent preoperative duplex scanning and CEUS; Sonovue was used as a contrast agent. AP neovascularization was assessed on a 4-grade visual scale and with 3 different quantitative methods using QLAB software. On the visual scale (method 1), poorly (37%) and moderately (51%) vascularized plaques were the most common. Quantitative analysis (data were presented as Me (Q1; Q3)) revealed that the number of blood vessels per 1 cm2 of the plaque (method 2) was 16 (10; 26), the ratio of the total vessel area to the plaque area (method 3) was 6% (3; 9), and AP ROI (method 4) was 2.6 dB (1.8; 4.1). Significant correlations were demonstrated between the results produced by method 2 and method 3 (р < 0.0001), method 3 and method 2 (p = 0.0006), and between pathomorphological findings and the results produced by methods 1–3, especially method 2 (p < 0.004). AP ROI brightness did not correlate with other results. The presence of hyperechoic components (calcifications) in AP dramatically reduced the reliability of US-based intraplaque neovascularization assessment. The most accurate CEUS-based quantitative method for assessing intraplaque neovascularization is estimation of blood vessel number per 1 cm2 of the plaque.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声造影评价颈动脉粥样硬化斑块新生血管
颈动脉粥样硬化斑块(AP)的新生血管与卒中风险增加有关。超声造影(CEUS)是一种广泛应用于斑块内新生血管成像的方法。不幸的是,没有标准的超声造影解释指南。本研究的目的是确定最可靠的基于ceus的AP新生血管评估方法。73例患者在颈动脉内膜切除术中切除了78例AP,其中5例患者两侧均有AP,并进行了形态学检查。所有患者术前均行双工扫描和超声造影;Sonovue被用作造影剂。采用QLAB软件,采用4级视觉评分和3种不同的定量方法对AP新生血管进行评估。在目测量表(方法1)上,较差(37%)和中度(51%)血管化斑块最常见。定量分析(数据以Me (Q1;Q3))显示每1 cm2斑块(方法2)的血管数量为16 (10;26),总血管面积与斑块面积(方法3)之比为6%(方法3;AP ROI (method 4)为2.6 dB (1.8;4.1)。方法2和方法3、方法3和方法2的结果之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.0001),方法3和方法2的结果之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.0006),病理形态学结果与方法1-3的结果之间存在显著相关性,特别是方法2 (p < 0.004)。AP ROI亮度与其他结果不相关。AP中高回声成分(钙化)的存在显著降低了基于美国的斑块内新生血管评估的可靠性。评估斑块内新生血管形成最准确的基于ceb的定量方法是估计斑块每1平方厘米的血管数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methods for exosome isolation and characterization Copyright Acknowledgments Contributors The potential of exosomes as theragnostics in various clinical situations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1