Does Facebook penetration improve governance? A reflection on the World Governance Indicators of 185 countries

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Policy Regulation and Governance Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1108/dprg-07-2021-0094
M. Morshed, Tanmoy Mazumder
{"title":"Does Facebook penetration improve governance? A reflection on the World Governance Indicators of 185 countries","authors":"M. Morshed, Tanmoy Mazumder","doi":"10.1108/dprg-07-2021-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSocial media creates a public sphere, which functions as the third wheel of governance. This study aims to examine the relationship between Facebook penetration and the World Bank’s World Governance Indicators.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFirst, a Pearson correlation was estimated between Facebook penetration and governance indicators. Second, ordinary least squares analysis was used to examine a variety of additional economic and population factors, including Facebook penetration. In both instances, the colinearity of the variables is examined.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that there is no conclusive correlation between Facebook penetration and governance; however, the opposite is true for developing, emerging and least developed countries, though the relationship is not uniform across regions. In addition, per capita gross domestic product and population dynamics, specifically the proportion of the population aged 15–64, have a significant impact on governance measures. The colinearity of the variables suggests that governance is a broad concept, and that the direct correlation between Facebook penetration and governance may be misleading.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFuture research should incorporate panel data from other social media platforms, such as Twitter and Reddit, to better understand temporal factors and the relationship between social media penetration and governance.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper opens up new avenue for investigation on the impact of social media on governance.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper can contribute to the complexity of social media as means for voice and accountability. In addition, the paper mentions how social media can be used more neutrally to ensure exposure to diverse perspectives.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe growing importance of the internet and the popularity of social networking websites are generating a great deal of scholarly attention. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is almost no literature that links Facebook penetration and governance. This paper intends to fill this void.\n","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-07-2021-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Social media creates a public sphere, which functions as the third wheel of governance. This study aims to examine the relationship between Facebook penetration and the World Bank’s World Governance Indicators. Design/methodology/approach First, a Pearson correlation was estimated between Facebook penetration and governance indicators. Second, ordinary least squares analysis was used to examine a variety of additional economic and population factors, including Facebook penetration. In both instances, the colinearity of the variables is examined. Findings The findings indicate that there is no conclusive correlation between Facebook penetration and governance; however, the opposite is true for developing, emerging and least developed countries, though the relationship is not uniform across regions. In addition, per capita gross domestic product and population dynamics, specifically the proportion of the population aged 15–64, have a significant impact on governance measures. The colinearity of the variables suggests that governance is a broad concept, and that the direct correlation between Facebook penetration and governance may be misleading. Research limitations/implications Future research should incorporate panel data from other social media platforms, such as Twitter and Reddit, to better understand temporal factors and the relationship between social media penetration and governance. Practical implications This paper opens up new avenue for investigation on the impact of social media on governance. Social implications This paper can contribute to the complexity of social media as means for voice and accountability. In addition, the paper mentions how social media can be used more neutrally to ensure exposure to diverse perspectives. Originality/value The growing importance of the internet and the popularity of social networking websites are generating a great deal of scholarly attention. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is almost no literature that links Facebook penetration and governance. This paper intends to fill this void.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook的渗透能改善公司治理吗?对185个国家世界治理指标的反思
目的社交媒体创造了一个公共领域,它的功能是管理的第三个轮子。本研究旨在检验Facebook渗透率与世界银行世界治理指标之间的关系。设计/方法/方法首先,估算了Facebook渗透率与治理指标之间的Pearson相关性。其次,使用普通最小二乘分析来检查各种额外的经济和人口因素,包括Facebook渗透率。在这两种情况下,检查了变量的共线性。研究结果表明,Facebook渗透率与治理之间没有决定性的相关性;然而,发展中国家、新兴国家和最不发达国家的情况正好相反,尽管各地区之间的关系并不统一。此外,人均国内生产总值和人口动态,特别是15-64岁人口的比例,对施政措施有重大影响。这些变量的共线性表明,治理是一个广泛的概念,Facebook渗透率与治理之间的直接关联可能具有误导性。未来的研究应该纳入来自其他社交媒体平台的面板数据,如Twitter和Reddit,以更好地理解时间因素以及社交媒体渗透与治理之间的关系。实践意义本文为研究社交媒体对治理的影响开辟了新的途径。社会意义这篇论文有助于揭示社会媒体作为发声和问责手段的复杂性。此外,论文还提到了如何更中立地使用社交媒体,以确保接触到不同的观点。独创性/价值互联网日益增长的重要性和社交网站的流行引起了大量的学术关注。据作者所知,几乎没有文献将Facebook的渗透和治理联系起来。本文旨在填补这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
期刊最新文献
Socio and macroeconomic determinants of mobile money adoption: a cross-cultural study of selected MENA and Sub-Saharan countries Adoption of digital payment FinTech service by Gen Y and Gen Z users: evidence from India Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable? Enterprise architecture for the transformation of public services based on citizen’s feedback Blockchain for environmental peacebuilding: application in water management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1