Analysis of the weight of school backpack with double strapson the postural control of children

Aryane Karoline Vital de Souza, Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves, Jéssica Cristina Leite, L. Vitor, D. Fujisawa
{"title":"Analysis of the weight of school backpack with double strapson the postural control of children","authors":"Aryane Karoline Vital de Souza, Jessica Caroliny de Jesus Neves, Jéssica Cristina Leite, L. Vitor, D. Fujisawa","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I0.39242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the influence of the weight of school backpacks on postural control of children. Cross-sectional study in healthy children  aged eight years old. The postural control was evaluated on the force plate (FP) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in three distinct conditions: without backpack (WB), and the backpack adjusted with 5% (.5) and 10% (. 10) of body mass. 90 children were evaluated, and 80% of them used backpacks with two shoulder straps, and 16%  of the children carried over 10% of  their body mass in the backpacks. Regarding the postural control with load on school backpack, there was increase in the sway  area of the center of pressure (A-COP.WB = 6.92 cm²; A-COP.5 = 8.39 cm²; A-COP.10 = 7.96 cm²) and time, in seconds, the performance of the TUG (TUG.WB = 4.75 s; TUG.5 = 4.99 s; TUG.10 = 5.06 s), with statistically significant difference between the loads (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0005), respectively. The anteroposterior (VELAP.SM = 2.41cm s-1; VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1; VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) and mediolateral velocity (VELML.WB = 2.38 cm s-1; VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1; VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) had a decrease in the median values with statistically significant difference in different conditions. School backpack load  increased the COP area, the time of the TUG and modified the response mechanisms. Therefore, loads up to 5% of body mass imposed on school backpack have negatively influenced the postural control.","PeriodicalId":7185,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","volume":"55 5 1","pages":"39242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V40I0.39242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the influence of the weight of school backpacks on postural control of children. Cross-sectional study in healthy children  aged eight years old. The postural control was evaluated on the force plate (FP) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in three distinct conditions: without backpack (WB), and the backpack adjusted with 5% (.5) and 10% (. 10) of body mass. 90 children were evaluated, and 80% of them used backpacks with two shoulder straps, and 16%  of the children carried over 10% of  their body mass in the backpacks. Regarding the postural control with load on school backpack, there was increase in the sway  area of the center of pressure (A-COP.WB = 6.92 cm²; A-COP.5 = 8.39 cm²; A-COP.10 = 7.96 cm²) and time, in seconds, the performance of the TUG (TUG.WB = 4.75 s; TUG.5 = 4.99 s; TUG.10 = 5.06 s), with statistically significant difference between the loads (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0005), respectively. The anteroposterior (VELAP.SM = 2.41cm s-1; VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1; VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) and mediolateral velocity (VELML.WB = 2.38 cm s-1; VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1; VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1; p = 0.0001) had a decrease in the median values with statistically significant difference in different conditions. School backpack load  increased the COP area, the time of the TUG and modified the response mechanisms. Therefore, loads up to 5% of body mass imposed on school backpack have negatively influenced the postural control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双肩书包重量对儿童体位控制的影响分析
目的探讨书包重量对儿童体位控制的影响。八岁健康儿童横断面研究。在三种不同的情况下:不带背包(WB),背包以5%(0.5)和10%(0.5)的幅度调整,通过力板(FP)和定时上走测试(TUG)来评估姿势控制。10)体重。对90名儿童进行了评估,其中80%的儿童使用双肩带背包,16%的儿童在背包中携带的重量超过其体重的10%。在负重姿势控制方面,压力中心摆动面积(A-COP)有所增加。WB = 6.92 cm²;一个警察。5 = 8.39 cm²;一个警察。10 = 7.96 cm²)和时间,以秒为单位,拖船(TUG.)的性能。WB = 4.75 s;TUG.5 = 4.99 s;TUG.10 = 5.06 s),负荷间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0001;P = 0.0005)。前后侧(VELAP)。SM = 2.41cm s-1;VELAP.5 = 2.30 cm s-1;VELAP.10 = 2.22 cm s-1;p = 0.0001)和中外侧速度(VELML)。WB = 2.38 cm s-1;VELML.5 = 2.28 cm s-1;VELML.10 = 2.20 cm s-1;P = 0.0001)中位值下降,不同条件下差异有统计学意义。学校背包载荷增加了COP面积、拖曳时间,改变了响应机制。因此,在学校背包上施加高达体重5%的负荷会对姿势控制产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health regulation: demand and challenges of the family health strategy in an inland municipality of the State of Ceará, Brazil Effect of lifestyle intervention holistic approach on blood glucose levels, health-related quality of life and medical treatment cost in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients Sexual dimorphism applying the mandibular canine index in a Brazilian sample: a pilot study Challenges to access health faced by rural population and their perception regarding healthcare Perceived self-esteem, resilience and stress of students entering a nursing degree
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1