Wilkinson Polynomials: Accuracy Analysis Based on Numerical Methods of the Taylor Series Derivative

V. Mandailina, S. Syaharuddin, Dewi Pramita, M. Ibrahim, H. R. P. Negara
{"title":"Wilkinson Polynomials: Accuracy Analysis Based on Numerical Methods of the Taylor Series Derivative","authors":"V. Mandailina, S. Syaharuddin, Dewi Pramita, M. Ibrahim, H. R. P. Negara","doi":"10.24042/DJM.V3I2.6134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some of the numeric methods for solutions of non-linear equations are taken from a derivative of the Taylor series, one of which is the Newton-Raphson method. However, this is not the only method for solving cases of non-linear equations. The purpose of the study is to compare the accuracy of several derivative methods of the Taylor series of both single order and two-order derivatives, namely Newton-Raphson method, Halley method, Olver method, Euler method, Chebyshev method, and Newton Midpoint Halley method. This research includes qualitative comparison types, where the simulation results of each method are described based on the comparison results. These six methods are simulated with the Wilkinson equation which is a 20-degree polynomial. The accuracy parameters used are the number of iterations, the roots of the equation, the function value f (x), and the error. Results showed that the Newton Midpoint Halley method was the most accurate method. This result is derived from the test starting point value of 0.5 to the equation root x = 1, completed in 3 iterations with a maximum error of 0.0001. The computational design and simulation of this iterative method which is a derivative of the two-order Taylor series is rarely found in college studies as it still rests on the Newton-Raphson method, so the results of this study can be recommended in future learning.","PeriodicalId":11442,"journal":{"name":"Dwight's Journal of Music","volume":"54 1","pages":"155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dwight's Journal of Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/DJM.V3I2.6134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some of the numeric methods for solutions of non-linear equations are taken from a derivative of the Taylor series, one of which is the Newton-Raphson method. However, this is not the only method for solving cases of non-linear equations. The purpose of the study is to compare the accuracy of several derivative methods of the Taylor series of both single order and two-order derivatives, namely Newton-Raphson method, Halley method, Olver method, Euler method, Chebyshev method, and Newton Midpoint Halley method. This research includes qualitative comparison types, where the simulation results of each method are described based on the comparison results. These six methods are simulated with the Wilkinson equation which is a 20-degree polynomial. The accuracy parameters used are the number of iterations, the roots of the equation, the function value f (x), and the error. Results showed that the Newton Midpoint Halley method was the most accurate method. This result is derived from the test starting point value of 0.5 to the equation root x = 1, completed in 3 iterations with a maximum error of 0.0001. The computational design and simulation of this iterative method which is a derivative of the two-order Taylor series is rarely found in college studies as it still rests on the Newton-Raphson method, so the results of this study can be recommended in future learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威尔金森多项式:基于泰勒级数导数数值方法的精度分析
求解非线性方程的一些数值方法是从泰勒级数的导数中得到的,其中之一是牛顿-拉夫森方法。然而,这并不是求解非线性方程的唯一方法。本研究的目的是比较几种单阶和二阶导数的泰勒级数的导数方法,即Newton- raphson法、Halley法、Olver法、Euler法、Chebyshev法和Newton中点Halley法的精度。本研究包括定性比较类型,根据比较结果描述每种方法的仿真结果。这六种方法用20度多项式威尔金森方程进行了模拟。使用的精度参数是迭代次数、方程的根、函数值f (x)和误差。结果表明,牛顿中点哈雷法是最精确的方法。该结果由测试起始点值0.5到方程根x = 1,经过3次迭代完成,最大误差为0.0001。这种二阶泰勒级数的导数迭代方法的计算设计和模拟在大学研究中很少发现,因为它仍然依赖于Newton-Raphson方法,所以本研究的结果可以在以后的学习中推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
El nino index prediction model using quantile mapping approach on sea surface temperature data Confidence interval estimation of gamma distribution lifetime data using score and bootstrap methods tisztességtelen kereskedelmi gyakorlatok szabályozása és joggyakorlata Lengyelországban fogyasztói adásvétel egyes kérdéseinek szabályozása és joggyakorlata Romániában fogyasztói adásvétel egyes kérdéseinek szabályozása és joggyakorlata Szlovákiában
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1