Prediction of violent behaviour

D. Louw, C. Strydom, Karel Esterhuyse
{"title":"Prediction of violent behaviour","authors":"D. Louw, C. Strydom, Karel Esterhuyse","doi":"10.1177/1466802505057717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the factors that are deemed important by magistrates and psychologists in the prediction of dangerous or violent behaviour. Five case studies, in which the risk of violence came into play, were presented to the respondents (85 magistrates and 52 psychologists) with the aid of a self-compiled questionnaire. The opinions of the legal practitioners and psychologists concerning the risk of violence that was involved in each case study were tested on the basis of two questions: (i) To what degree is the person in the case study a danger to the community? and (ii) Which risk factors were decisive in respect of Question 1? There was agreement between the two professional groups regarding risk factors. However, in certain cases there was a difference between the two professional groups in respect of the weight allocated to the specific risk factors (for example, psychologists attached more value than the legal practitioners to age, race, gender, the absence of a criminal record, the absence of remorse and drug addiction). Another insight-giving finding was that the opinions of the psychologists concerning risk factors are more substantially supported by existing research than those of magistrates.","PeriodicalId":10793,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice","volume":"10 4 1","pages":"379 - 406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802505057717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article focuses on the factors that are deemed important by magistrates and psychologists in the prediction of dangerous or violent behaviour. Five case studies, in which the risk of violence came into play, were presented to the respondents (85 magistrates and 52 psychologists) with the aid of a self-compiled questionnaire. The opinions of the legal practitioners and psychologists concerning the risk of violence that was involved in each case study were tested on the basis of two questions: (i) To what degree is the person in the case study a danger to the community? and (ii) Which risk factors were decisive in respect of Question 1? There was agreement between the two professional groups regarding risk factors. However, in certain cases there was a difference between the two professional groups in respect of the weight allocated to the specific risk factors (for example, psychologists attached more value than the legal practitioners to age, race, gender, the absence of a criminal record, the absence of remorse and drug addiction). Another insight-giving finding was that the opinions of the psychologists concerning risk factors are more substantially supported by existing research than those of magistrates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暴力行为预测
这篇文章的重点是地方法官和心理学家在预测危险或暴力行为时认为重要的因素。在自行编写的调查问卷的帮助下,向答复者(85名地方法官和52名心理学家)提交了涉及暴力风险的五个案例研究。法律从业人员和心理学家对每个个案研究中所涉及的暴力风险的意见是根据两个问题进行检验的:(i)个案研究中的人对社会构成多大程度的危险?(ii)就问题1而言,哪些风险因素是决定性的?两个专业小组对风险因素的看法是一致的。但是,在某些情况下,两组专业人员对具体风险因素的权重有所不同(例如,心理学家比法律从业人员更重视年龄、种族、性别、没有犯罪记录、没有悔恨和吸毒成瘾)。另一个发人深思的发现是,心理学家关于风险因素的观点比地方法官的观点更能得到现有研究的有力支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Discursive Construction of Co-Ethnic Migration A Note on Optimal Allocation Mechanisms Annual Index Educating policymakers and setting the criminal justice policymaking agenda Facing inwards and outwards? Institutional racism, race equality and the role of Black and Asian professional associations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1