S. Chandrasekhar, D. Alexis, J. Jin, Taimur Malik, V. Dwarakanath
{"title":"Polymer Injectivity Enhancement Using Chemical Stimulation: A Multi-Dimensional Study","authors":"S. Chandrasekhar, D. Alexis, J. Jin, Taimur Malik, V. Dwarakanath","doi":"10.2118/209425-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chevron injected emulsion polymer in the Captain field, offshore UK in the last decade at various scales (Poulsen et al., 2018). Pilot horizontal wells had exhibited faster than designed injectivity decline and Jackson et al. (2019) documented the causes to include oleic phase damage from a) injection of produced water containing crude oil after imperfect separation, and b) entrainment of injected emulsion polymer’s carrier oil. The wells were remediated with a surfactant stimulation package (Alexis et al., 2021; Dwarakanath et al., 2016). The remediation boosted the water relative permeability near wellbore which enhanced injectivity and allowed higher processing rates for subsequent continuous polymer injection.\n In this work, we conducted a set of core floods in slabs of surrogate rock of varying dimension and patterns to demonstrate the beneficial effect of near wellbore stimulation in the general case. 0.04 PV of the remediation package was injected and we show consistent injectivity enhancement across the experiments. We demonstrate the dominant effect of well skin treatment on the pressure drop profile compared to flow resistance from a) residual oil saturation and b) viscous fingering. The result is an important reminder for injectivity maintenance for high polymer flood processing rates for the life of the project. Clean injection fluids were demonstrated to maintain injectivity. We show applicability of stimulation for injectors into viscous oil reservoirs with adverse viscosity ratio. The robust nature of the remediation package developed by Alexis et al. (2021) is also shown, working to efficacy on viscous oil, as well as in situ phase separated polymer. We estimated skin and stimulation depth for a line drive case with low chemical dosage finding that 0.04 pore volumes of surfactant injection at 0.33 oil saturation units gave injectivity improvement of 31%. Surfactant stimulation is thus broadly applicable to wells with oleic phase skin.","PeriodicalId":10935,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, April 25, 2022","volume":"5 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, April 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209425-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chevron injected emulsion polymer in the Captain field, offshore UK in the last decade at various scales (Poulsen et al., 2018). Pilot horizontal wells had exhibited faster than designed injectivity decline and Jackson et al. (2019) documented the causes to include oleic phase damage from a) injection of produced water containing crude oil after imperfect separation, and b) entrainment of injected emulsion polymer’s carrier oil. The wells were remediated with a surfactant stimulation package (Alexis et al., 2021; Dwarakanath et al., 2016). The remediation boosted the water relative permeability near wellbore which enhanced injectivity and allowed higher processing rates for subsequent continuous polymer injection.
In this work, we conducted a set of core floods in slabs of surrogate rock of varying dimension and patterns to demonstrate the beneficial effect of near wellbore stimulation in the general case. 0.04 PV of the remediation package was injected and we show consistent injectivity enhancement across the experiments. We demonstrate the dominant effect of well skin treatment on the pressure drop profile compared to flow resistance from a) residual oil saturation and b) viscous fingering. The result is an important reminder for injectivity maintenance for high polymer flood processing rates for the life of the project. Clean injection fluids were demonstrated to maintain injectivity. We show applicability of stimulation for injectors into viscous oil reservoirs with adverse viscosity ratio. The robust nature of the remediation package developed by Alexis et al. (2021) is also shown, working to efficacy on viscous oil, as well as in situ phase separated polymer. We estimated skin and stimulation depth for a line drive case with low chemical dosage finding that 0.04 pore volumes of surfactant injection at 0.33 oil saturation units gave injectivity improvement of 31%. Surfactant stimulation is thus broadly applicable to wells with oleic phase skin.
在过去十年中,雪佛龙在英国近海的Captain油田以不同规模注入了乳液聚合物(Poulsen等人,2018)。试验水平井的注入能力下降速度比设计的要快,Jackson等人(2019)记录了造成油相损害的原因,包括a)在分离不完全后注入含有原油的采出水,b)注入的乳液聚合物的载体油被夹带。这些井采用表面活性剂增产措施进行修复(Alexis等,2021;Dwarakanath et al., 2016)。补救措施提高了近井水的相对渗透率,增强了注入能力,并为后续连续注入聚合物提供了更高的处理率。在这项工作中,我们在不同尺寸和模式的替代岩板中进行了一组岩心注水,以证明在一般情况下近井增产的有益效果。注入0.04 PV的修复包,我们在整个实验中显示出一致的注入增强。我们证明了与a)残余油饱和度和b)粘性指指的流动阻力相比,井表皮处理对压降剖面的主要影响。该研究结果对在项目生命周期内保持高聚合物驱处理速率的注入能力具有重要的指导意义。干净的注入液被证明可以保持注入能力。证明了注水井增产措施对具有不利粘度比的稠油油藏的适用性。亚历克西斯等人(2021)开发的修复包的坚固性也得到了证明,对粘性油和原位相分离聚合物都有效。我们估计了低化学剂量的线性驱动情况下的表皮和刺激深度,发现在0.33含油饱和度单位下注入0.04孔隙体积的表面活性剂,注入能力提高了31%。因此,表面活性剂增产措施广泛适用于油相表皮井。