Summary and analysis of national-wide γ-spectrometry assessment for radiological health institutions from 2015 to 2017

李则书, Li Zeshu, 拓飞, Tuo Fei, 张京, Zhang Jing, 周强, Zhou Qiang, 杨宝路, Yang Baolu, 李文红, L. Wenhong
{"title":"Summary and analysis of national-wide γ-spectrometry assessment for radiological health institutions from 2015 to 2017","authors":"李则书, Li Zeshu, 拓飞, Tuo Fei, 张京, Zhang Jing, 周强, Zhou Qiang, 杨宝路, Yang Baolu, 李文红, L. Wenhong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo standardize the operation and data processing in radiological health institutions in China, in order to promote the assessment of γ-spectrometry, improve the measurement and analysis capabilities of each laboratory, and accordingly improve accuracy of environment sample measuring. \n \n \nMethods \nBy collecting the values of 232Th, 40K and 137Cs contents in soil samples from 2015 to 2017, the assessment results of γ-spectrometry laboratores were summarized and analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nThe technical institutions from 25 provinces were involved in the assessment until 2017, including disease control and prevention centers, entry-exit inspection and quarantine agencies, research institutes, universities and companies. The number of participants was increased from 40 to 48, and the qualified rate exceeded 90%, and the excellent rate was no less than 11% each year. The percentage of relative deviation less than 10% between the measuring result of 232Th, 40K and 137Cs contents and the reference value was larger than 80% in 2017. The accuracy became better. However, the number of institutions with U and Z score less than 1 was increased from 11 to 25, suggesting that the precision of measuring result has also been greatly improved. \n \n \nConclusions \nRadiological health institutions in China have good measurement and analysis capabilities with regard to γ-spectrometry, which can meet the needs of environmental sample measurement and in-food radionuclide risk monitoring in an emergency of nuclear and radiation. But a few institutions′ measuring results were largely different from the reference values, as a consequence, it is important to strengthen their ability of measurement and analysis. \n \n \nKey words: \nγ-spectrometry; Relative deviation; Accuracy; Precision","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"790-794"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.10.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To standardize the operation and data processing in radiological health institutions in China, in order to promote the assessment of γ-spectrometry, improve the measurement and analysis capabilities of each laboratory, and accordingly improve accuracy of environment sample measuring. Methods By collecting the values of 232Th, 40K and 137Cs contents in soil samples from 2015 to 2017, the assessment results of γ-spectrometry laboratores were summarized and analyzed. Results The technical institutions from 25 provinces were involved in the assessment until 2017, including disease control and prevention centers, entry-exit inspection and quarantine agencies, research institutes, universities and companies. The number of participants was increased from 40 to 48, and the qualified rate exceeded 90%, and the excellent rate was no less than 11% each year. The percentage of relative deviation less than 10% between the measuring result of 232Th, 40K and 137Cs contents and the reference value was larger than 80% in 2017. The accuracy became better. However, the number of institutions with U and Z score less than 1 was increased from 11 to 25, suggesting that the precision of measuring result has also been greatly improved. Conclusions Radiological health institutions in China have good measurement and analysis capabilities with regard to γ-spectrometry, which can meet the needs of environmental sample measurement and in-food radionuclide risk monitoring in an emergency of nuclear and radiation. But a few institutions′ measuring results were largely different from the reference values, as a consequence, it is important to strengthen their ability of measurement and analysis. Key words: γ-spectrometry; Relative deviation; Accuracy; Precision
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015 - 2017年全国放射卫生机构γ谱评估总结与分析
目的规范中国放射卫生机构的操作和数据处理,以促进γ能谱法的评估,提高各实验室的测量和分析能力,从而提高环境样品测量的准确性。方法收集2015 - 2017年土壤样品中232Th、40K和137Cs含量,总结分析γ-谱法实验室评价结果。结果截至2017年,共有25个省份的技术机构参与评估,包括疾病预防控制中心、出入境检验检疫机构、科研院所、高校和企业。参加人数从40人增加到48人,每年合格率超过90%,优秀率不低于11%。2017年,232Th、40K、137Cs含量测量结果与参考值相对偏差小于10%的比例大于80%。精确度提高了。然而,U和Z得分低于1的机构数量从11所增加到25所,这表明测量结果的精度也得到了很大提高。结论我国放射卫生机构具有较好的γ-能谱测量分析能力,可满足核与辐射突发事件中环境样品测量和食品中放射性核素风险监测的需要。但少数机构的测量结果与参考值相差较大,因此,加强其测量和分析能力至关重要。关键词:γ谱法;相对偏差;准确;精度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Infection control status of novel coronavirus pneumonia and radiation safety at CT workplace Current status of the application of radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy resources in Huai'an City in 2020 The application value of low-dose CT scan in pregnant women with COVID-19 Eeffects of tube voltage on image quality and radiation dose of paranasal sinus CT examination Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1