Enabling Safe and Efficient Well Plug & Abandonments Through Use of Rigless Technologies

Oleksandr Spuskanyuk, David C. Haeberle, B. M. Baumert, B. King, Benjamin T. Hillier
{"title":"Enabling Safe and Efficient Well Plug & Abandonments Through Use of Rigless Technologies","authors":"Oleksandr Spuskanyuk, David C. Haeberle, B. M. Baumert, B. King, Benjamin T. Hillier","doi":"10.2118/207456-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The growing number of upcoming well abandonments has become an important driver to seek efficiencies in optimizing abandonment costs while establishing long term well integrity and complying with local regulatory requirements. With an increasing global inventory of Plug and Abandonment (P&A) candidates, Exxonmobil has been driven to look for the most reliable, safe, and cost-efficient P&A technologies. ExxonMobil's P&A guidelines are consistent with and often more stringent than the local regulatory requirements but are also achievable, at least in part, with rigless technologies, leading to a more cost-efficient approach while ensuring well integrity. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the success of rigless abandonments and their benefits compared to rig-based solutions.\n When developing a well abandonment plan, it is essential to consider a number of factors. These include local regulations, identification of zones to be isolated and suitable caprocks, and recognition of constraints including well history, conditions and uncertainties. Teams should begin with low cost operations without a rig if possible, estimate costs and effectiveness to achieve the barrier requirements, and evaluate batch operation opportunities for multi-well programs. ExxonMobil case studies are shown to help describe in detail how to make decisions about applicability of rigless abandonment options and how to properly execute such abandonments to achieve compliance with the barrier requirements.\n It has been demonstrated that significant cost savings can be achieved by staging the abandonment program in a way that lower cost technologies are utilized during the early stages of well abandonment, starting with wireline where possible, followed by coiled tubing and finally by a pulling unit, as appropriate. P&A execution could be achieved without a rig in a majority of cases, including most offshore wells, with the need to use a rig only in special circumstances or phases of execution. It is important to note that the barrier placement and safety of rigless P&A execution will not be compromised, as compared to the rig-based P&As. Additional cost savings could be achieved by further optimizing P&A design at the well design stage, ensuring that there are no built-in limiters that would prevent rigless P&A execution at the end of well life.\n Several case studies from ExxonMobil's global offshore experience demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of rigless P&A operations, with significant cost savings compared to rig-based P&As. It has been evident that rigless P&A choice is applicable to the variety of ExxonMobil's P&A projects of different complexities, with the same or superior quality of abandonment and safety record.","PeriodicalId":11069,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207456-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing number of upcoming well abandonments has become an important driver to seek efficiencies in optimizing abandonment costs while establishing long term well integrity and complying with local regulatory requirements. With an increasing global inventory of Plug and Abandonment (P&A) candidates, Exxonmobil has been driven to look for the most reliable, safe, and cost-efficient P&A technologies. ExxonMobil's P&A guidelines are consistent with and often more stringent than the local regulatory requirements but are also achievable, at least in part, with rigless technologies, leading to a more cost-efficient approach while ensuring well integrity. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the success of rigless abandonments and their benefits compared to rig-based solutions. When developing a well abandonment plan, it is essential to consider a number of factors. These include local regulations, identification of zones to be isolated and suitable caprocks, and recognition of constraints including well history, conditions and uncertainties. Teams should begin with low cost operations without a rig if possible, estimate costs and effectiveness to achieve the barrier requirements, and evaluate batch operation opportunities for multi-well programs. ExxonMobil case studies are shown to help describe in detail how to make decisions about applicability of rigless abandonment options and how to properly execute such abandonments to achieve compliance with the barrier requirements. It has been demonstrated that significant cost savings can be achieved by staging the abandonment program in a way that lower cost technologies are utilized during the early stages of well abandonment, starting with wireline where possible, followed by coiled tubing and finally by a pulling unit, as appropriate. P&A execution could be achieved without a rig in a majority of cases, including most offshore wells, with the need to use a rig only in special circumstances or phases of execution. It is important to note that the barrier placement and safety of rigless P&A execution will not be compromised, as compared to the rig-based P&As. Additional cost savings could be achieved by further optimizing P&A design at the well design stage, ensuring that there are no built-in limiters that would prevent rigless P&A execution at the end of well life. Several case studies from ExxonMobil's global offshore experience demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of rigless P&A operations, with significant cost savings compared to rig-based P&As. It has been evident that rigless P&A choice is applicable to the variety of ExxonMobil's P&A projects of different complexities, with the same or superior quality of abandonment and safety record.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过使用无钻机技术,实现安全高效的封井和弃井作业
随着弃井数量的不断增加,在建立长期油井完整性和遵守当地监管要求的同时,寻求优化弃井成本的效率已成为一个重要的推动力。随着全球封堵弃井(P&A)候选产品库存的增加,埃克森美孚一直在寻找最可靠、最安全、最具成本效益的P&A技术。ExxonMobil的P&A准则与当地监管要求一致,甚至比当地监管要求更严格,但也可以通过无钻机技术实现,至少在一定程度上可以实现,从而在确保油井完整性的同时提高成本效益。本文的目的是证明无钻机弃井的成功,以及与基于钻机的解决方案相比,它们的优势。在制定弃井计划时,必须考虑许多因素。这些措施包括当地法规、识别需要隔离的区域和合适的盖层,以及识别井史、条件和不确定性等限制因素。如果可能的话,团队应该从没有钻机的低成本作业开始,评估成本和效率,以达到隔离要求,并评估多井项目的批量作业机会。ExxonMobil的案例研究有助于详细描述如何对无钻机弃井方案的适用性做出决策,以及如何正确执行此类弃井以满足屏障要求。实践证明,通过在弃井的早期阶段采用成本较低的技术,从电缆开始,然后是连续油管,最后是适当的拉拔装置,可以实现显著的成本节约。在大多数情况下(包括大多数海上井),弃井作业可以在没有钻机的情况下完成,只有在特殊情况或执行阶段才需要使用钻机。值得注意的是,与基于钻机的弃井作业相比,无钻机弃井作业的屏障位置和安全性不会受到影响。通过在井设计阶段进一步优化P&A设计,确保在井寿命结束时没有内置限制器来阻止无钻机P&A的执行,可以进一步节省成本。ExxonMobil全球海上经验的几个案例研究证明了无钻机弃井作业的可行性和有效性,与基于钻机的弃井作业相比,可以显著节省成本。很明显,无钻机弃井选择适用于埃克森美孚各种不同复杂程度的弃井弃井项目,且弃井质量和安全记录相同或更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Visualization of Oil Displacement by Foam in Porous Media Maximizing Condensate Recovery With Proven Cost Simulation for a Giant UAE Field: Base Study to Estimate Productivity between Horizontal and Vertical Wells Rationalization of Flares at Terminal Island A Geoengineering Approach to Maximum Reservoir Contact Wells Design: Case Study in a Carbonate Reservoir Under Water and Miscible Gas Injection Maximizing Brine Recovery After the Displacement of Reservoir Drill-in Fluids to Reduce Well Cost Via New, Alternate Technology In a Reservoir Offshore Abu Dhabi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1