Evolution of the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli isolated as a cause of infection in patients admitted to a iv-level hospital in Lima, Peru

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Journal of Tropical Pathology Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.5216/rpt.v51i3.74360
Wilfredo Flores-Paredes, N. Luque, Roger Albornoz, Nayade Rojas, M. Espinoza, J. Ruiz, Maria J Pons
{"title":"Evolution of the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli isolated as a cause of infection in patients admitted to a iv-level hospital in Lima, Peru","authors":"Wilfredo Flores-Paredes, N. Luque, Roger Albornoz, Nayade Rojas, M. Espinoza, J. Ruiz, Maria J Pons","doi":"10.5216/rpt.v51i3.74360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The levels and evolution of antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli during 01/2009-06/2010 (Period 1), 01/2012-06-2013 (Period 2) and 07/2013-12/2014 (Period 3) were analyzed. Identification, susceptibility levels to 13 antibiotics and the presence of extendedspectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) were determined. Overall, 9,918 microorganisms were isolated as a cause of infection. Of these 3,016 (30.4%) were E. coli, with 1,770 (59%), 992 (33%) and 254 (8%), from the Medicine and the Surgery Departments and the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), respectively. There was a significant increase (p=0.0002) of E. coli throughout considered periods. The isolates presented high levels of resistance (>60%) to cephalosporins, ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole, being only susceptible to imipenem (0.3% of resistance) and tigecycline. Overall the analysis of evolution of antimicrobial resistance showed that resistance to cephalosporins and amikacin significantly increased, while, the ones of piperacillintazobactam, cotrimoxazole and gentamicin had significantly decreased. Nevertheless, the ICU isolates showed an inverse scenario for cephalosporins. These findings agree with an increase of ESBLs on the Medicine (56% to 66%; p<0.0001) and on the Surgery (54% to 62%; p=0.0197) departments, with a parallel decrease in the ICU (76% to 68%). In summary, high levels of antimicrobial resistance have been reported among E. coli, with worrisome levels of ESBL. A continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance levels in the area is needed. \nKEY WORDS: Escherichia coli; antimicrobial resistance; cephalosporins","PeriodicalId":36789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v51i3.74360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The levels and evolution of antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli during 01/2009-06/2010 (Period 1), 01/2012-06-2013 (Period 2) and 07/2013-12/2014 (Period 3) were analyzed. Identification, susceptibility levels to 13 antibiotics and the presence of extendedspectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) were determined. Overall, 9,918 microorganisms were isolated as a cause of infection. Of these 3,016 (30.4%) were E. coli, with 1,770 (59%), 992 (33%) and 254 (8%), from the Medicine and the Surgery Departments and the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), respectively. There was a significant increase (p=0.0002) of E. coli throughout considered periods. The isolates presented high levels of resistance (>60%) to cephalosporins, ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole, being only susceptible to imipenem (0.3% of resistance) and tigecycline. Overall the analysis of evolution of antimicrobial resistance showed that resistance to cephalosporins and amikacin significantly increased, while, the ones of piperacillintazobactam, cotrimoxazole and gentamicin had significantly decreased. Nevertheless, the ICU isolates showed an inverse scenario for cephalosporins. These findings agree with an increase of ESBLs on the Medicine (56% to 66%; p<0.0001) and on the Surgery (54% to 62%; p=0.0197) departments, with a parallel decrease in the ICU (76% to 68%). In summary, high levels of antimicrobial resistance have been reported among E. coli, with worrisome levels of ESBL. A continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance levels in the area is needed. KEY WORDS: Escherichia coli; antimicrobial resistance; cephalosporins
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁利马一家四级医院收治的患者中作为感染原因分离出的大肠杆菌的流行程度和抗菌素耐药性的演变
分析2009年1月- 2010年6月(第1期)、2012年1月-2013年6月(第2期)和2013年7月- 2014年12月(第3期)大肠杆菌的耐药性水平及演变。测定13种抗生素的鉴定、药敏水平和广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)的存在。总共分离出9918种微生物作为感染的原因。其中3016例(30.4%)为大肠杆菌,分别有1770例(59%)、992例(33%)和254例(8%)来自内科和外科以及重症监护病房(ICU)。在整个研究期间,大肠杆菌的数量显著增加(p=0.0002)。分离株对头孢菌素、环丙沙星和复方新诺明的耐药程度较高(>60%),仅对亚胺培南(0.3%)和替加环素敏感。总体而言,抗菌药物耐药性演变分析显示,对头孢菌素和阿米卡星的耐药性显著增加,而对哌拉西林唑巴坦、复方新诺明和庆大霉素的耐药性显著降低。然而,ICU的分离株对头孢菌素表现出相反的情况。这些发现与ESBLs在药物上的增加(56%至66%;p<0.0001)和手术组(54%比62%;p=0.0197), ICU也出现了相应的下降(76%至68%)。总之,据报道,大肠杆菌中存在高水平的抗微生物药物耐药性,而ESBL的水平令人担忧。需要对该地区的抗微生物药物耐药性水平进行持续监测。关键词:大肠杆菌;抗菌素耐药性;头孢菌素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pathology
Journal of Tropical Pathology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and the factors associated with pediculosis capitis in schoolchildren in the city of Niterói, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil Geospatial analysis of american tegumentary leishmaniasis in Alagoas, 2007-2021 Disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis: lesional polymorphism and late diagnosis in an immunocompetent patient Neurosyphilis in patients at a university hospital in the central west region of Brazil Evaluation of the snakebite severity in the brazilian midwest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1