How Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Knowledge, Training, and Provider Concerns Predict Referrals and Placement

C. Thompson, J. Broecker, Maggie Dade
{"title":"How Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Knowledge, Training, and Provider Concerns Predict Referrals and Placement","authors":"C. Thompson, J. Broecker, Maggie Dade","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2019.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Providing long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; eg, subdermal implants and intrauterine devices [IUDs]) can help mitigate rates of unintended pregnancy because they are the most effective reversible contraceptive methods. However, many varied barriers to LARC placement are reported. Medical education and training can be tailored if there is a better understanding of how barriers predict LARC referral and to predicting LARC placement. Objective To understand how a variety of key barriers to LARC placement are related to one another; to identify which of the barriers, when considered simultaneously, predict LARC referral and LARC placement; and to assess the barriers to LARC placement that persist, even when a major barrier, training, is removed. Methods We recruited providers (obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians, pediatricians, internal medicine physicians, certified nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives) across the state of Ohio. Participants were compensated with a $35 Amazon gift card for completing an online survey comprising 38 Likert-type items, an 11-item knowledge test, LARC placement and referral questions, and demographic questions. We conducted data analyses that included correlations, odds ratios, and independent samples t tests. Results A total of 224 providers participated in the study. Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, training, and provider concerns were correlated with one another. Training was found to positively predict placement and negatively predict referral when other barriers, such as knowledge and provider concerns, were considered simultaneously. Of providers who were trained to place implants, 18.6% (n=16) said they referred implant placement, and 17.4% (n=15) said they did not place implants. Of providers who were trained to place IUDs, 26.3% (n=26) said they referred IUD placement, and 27.3% (n=27) said they did not place IUDs. Those who referred placement and those who did not place LARCs reported greater barriers (in type and magnitude) to LARC placement than those who did place LARCs. Conclusion(s) Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, training, and provider concerns about barriers to LARC placement were interdependent. Even when providers were trained to place LARCs, a significant portion referred or did not place them. Efforts to increase LARC placement need to address multifaceted barriers.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"725 - 734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Context Providing long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; eg, subdermal implants and intrauterine devices [IUDs]) can help mitigate rates of unintended pregnancy because they are the most effective reversible contraceptive methods. However, many varied barriers to LARC placement are reported. Medical education and training can be tailored if there is a better understanding of how barriers predict LARC referral and to predicting LARC placement. Objective To understand how a variety of key barriers to LARC placement are related to one another; to identify which of the barriers, when considered simultaneously, predict LARC referral and LARC placement; and to assess the barriers to LARC placement that persist, even when a major barrier, training, is removed. Methods We recruited providers (obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians, pediatricians, internal medicine physicians, certified nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives) across the state of Ohio. Participants were compensated with a $35 Amazon gift card for completing an online survey comprising 38 Likert-type items, an 11-item knowledge test, LARC placement and referral questions, and demographic questions. We conducted data analyses that included correlations, odds ratios, and independent samples t tests. Results A total of 224 providers participated in the study. Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, training, and provider concerns were correlated with one another. Training was found to positively predict placement and negatively predict referral when other barriers, such as knowledge and provider concerns, were considered simultaneously. Of providers who were trained to place implants, 18.6% (n=16) said they referred implant placement, and 17.4% (n=15) said they did not place implants. Of providers who were trained to place IUDs, 26.3% (n=26) said they referred IUD placement, and 27.3% (n=27) said they did not place IUDs. Those who referred placement and those who did not place LARCs reported greater barriers (in type and magnitude) to LARC placement than those who did place LARCs. Conclusion(s) Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, training, and provider concerns about barriers to LARC placement were interdependent. Even when providers were trained to place LARCs, a significant portion referred or did not place them. Efforts to increase LARC placement need to address multifaceted barriers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长效可逆避孕知识、培训和提供者关注如何预测转诊和安置
提供长效可逆避孕(LARC;例如,皮下植入和宫内节育器(iud)可以帮助降低意外怀孕的发生率,因为它们是最有效的可逆避孕方法。然而,据报道,LARC安置有许多不同的障碍。如果更好地了解障碍如何预测LARC转诊和预测LARC安置,则可以调整医学教育和培训。目的了解LARC放置的各种关键障碍如何相互关联;确定在同时考虑哪些障碍时,预测LARC转诊和LARC安置;并评估持续存在的LARC安置障碍,即使一个主要障碍——培训已经消除。方法我们在俄亥俄州招募医疗服务提供者(妇产科医生、家庭医生、儿科医生、内科医生、注册执业护士和注册助产士)。参与者完成了一项在线调查,包括38个李克特类型的问题,11个知识测试,LARC安置和推荐问题,以及人口统计问题,然后获得了35美元的亚马逊礼品卡。我们进行了数据分析,包括相关性、优势比和独立样本t检验。结果224名医护人员参与了本研究。长效可逆避孕知识、培训和提供者关注相互相关。当同时考虑到其他障碍,如知识和提供者问题时,发现培训对安置有积极的预测作用,对转诊有消极的预测作用。在接受过放置种植体培训的提供者中,18.6% (n=16)的人说他们推荐放置种植体,17.4% (n=15)的人说他们没有放置种植体。在接受过放置宫内节育器培训的提供者中,26.3% (n=26)表示他们推荐放置宫内节育器,27.3% (n=27)表示他们没有放置宫内节育器。那些提到放置LARC和没有放置LARC的人报告说,与放置LARC的人相比,放置LARC的障碍(在类型和大小上)更大。结论(5)长效可逆避孕知识、培训和提供者对LARC放置障碍的关注是相互依赖的。即使提供者接受过安置larc的培训,也有很大一部分人转诊或没有安置larc。增加LARC安置的努力需要解决多方面的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous neonatal subcutaneous emphysema: analysis of neonatal management Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data Cranial osteopathic techniques and electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power: a controlled crossover trial Response to “Further insight on AOA ophthalmology residency program closure data” UGRC 2021 recommendations on GME transition: pros and cons, opportunities and limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1