Mechanical Properties, Structure and Fracture Behavior of Additive Manufactured FFF-ABS Specimens

O. Gewelber, Y. Rosenthal, D. Ashkenazi, A. Stern
{"title":"Mechanical Properties, Structure and Fracture Behavior of Additive Manufactured FFF-ABS Specimens","authors":"O. Gewelber, Y. Rosenthal, D. Ashkenazi, A. Stern","doi":"10.35219/AWET.2020.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) method is one of the most important additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. This technology is used today with various kinds of thermoplastic materials, including ABS. The present study deals with the flexural strength and axial deflection of ABS specimens versus relative density, to observe the influence of build-orientations, build model and microscopic level defects of these properties. In this study, the mechanical and structural characterization of AM-FFF ABS material was studied by CAD modelling of different orientations, three point bending mechanical testing, visual testing, and multifocal light microscopy observation, including fractography analysis. To that end, three different standard building orientations (Flat, On Edge and Upright) were printed, and each was built in two different angle orientations (-45o/+45o and 0°/90o). Based on the three point bending testing results, it was found that the specimen with the highest flexural strength was not necessarily the one with the highest deflection. It was also observed that On Edge 0/+90o orientations showed a relatively larger flexural strength difference in comparison to other building orientations (Flat and Upright). When the mechanical properties achieved from a bending test next to the building platform were compared to the properties far from the building platform, only a slight difference was found, which means that the flexural strength difference results from the building strategy and it is not related to the specific bending surface. Based on fractography observation, there is a major difference in the mechanical properties and fracture surface appearance, when the samples are bent between the layers (Upright orientation) or when the samples are bent through the layers (Flat and On Edge orientation).","PeriodicalId":39009,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Fascicle XII, Welding Equipment and Technology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Fascicle XII, Welding Equipment and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35219/AWET.2020.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) method is one of the most important additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. This technology is used today with various kinds of thermoplastic materials, including ABS. The present study deals with the flexural strength and axial deflection of ABS specimens versus relative density, to observe the influence of build-orientations, build model and microscopic level defects of these properties. In this study, the mechanical and structural characterization of AM-FFF ABS material was studied by CAD modelling of different orientations, three point bending mechanical testing, visual testing, and multifocal light microscopy observation, including fractography analysis. To that end, three different standard building orientations (Flat, On Edge and Upright) were printed, and each was built in two different angle orientations (-45o/+45o and 0°/90o). Based on the three point bending testing results, it was found that the specimen with the highest flexural strength was not necessarily the one with the highest deflection. It was also observed that On Edge 0/+90o orientations showed a relatively larger flexural strength difference in comparison to other building orientations (Flat and Upright). When the mechanical properties achieved from a bending test next to the building platform were compared to the properties far from the building platform, only a slight difference was found, which means that the flexural strength difference results from the building strategy and it is not related to the specific bending surface. Based on fractography observation, there is a major difference in the mechanical properties and fracture surface appearance, when the samples are bent between the layers (Upright orientation) or when the samples are bent through the layers (Flat and On Edge orientation).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
添加剂制备FFF-ABS试样的力学性能、组织和断裂行为
熔丝制造(FFF)方法是最重要的增材制造(AM)技术之一。该技术目前用于各种热塑性材料,包括ABS。本研究涉及ABS试件的抗弯强度和轴向挠度随相对密度的变化,以观察构建方向、构建模型和微观水平缺陷对这些性能的影响。本研究通过不同取向的CAD建模、三点弯曲力学测试、目视测试、多焦点光镜观察(包括断口分析)研究了AM-FFF ABS材料的力学和结构表征。为此,打印了三种不同的标准建筑方向(平面,边缘和直立),每种建筑都有两种不同的角度方向(-45°/ +45°和0°/90°)。根据三点弯曲试验结果发现,具有最高抗弯强度的试件并不一定是具有最大挠度的试件。还观察到,与其他建筑方向(平和直立)相比,On Edge 0/+90°方向显示出相对较大的抗弯强度差异。当将靠近建筑平台的弯曲试验获得的力学性能与远离建筑平台的力学性能进行比较时,发现只有微小的差异,这意味着抗弯强度差异是由建筑策略引起的,而与具体的弯曲面无关。根据断口形貌观察,试样在层间弯曲时(垂直方向)和在层间弯曲时(平面和边缘方向),试样的力学性能和断口形貌存在较大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Non-Destructive Testing of Magnetically Impelled Arc Butt Welding of Mild Steel Tubes Effect of GTAW on the Tensile Strength and Hardness of Mild Steel Machine Learning for Parametrical Analysis of Friction Stir Welded Aluminum Metal Matrix Composites Mechanical Characterization of Filler Modified ABS 3D Printed Composites Made via Fused Filament Fabrication Review of Joining Various Materials by FSW Process and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1