It’s Just the Fact It’s Against Us: The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Young Children’s Caregivers’ Preventive Health Behaviors

S. Fleary, Patrece L. Joseph, Pauline B. Dimaano, Ailish Dougherty
{"title":"It’s Just the Fact It’s Against Us: The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Young Children’s Caregivers’ Preventive Health Behaviors","authors":"S. Fleary, Patrece L. Joseph, Pauline B. Dimaano, Ailish Dougherty","doi":"10.1177/26320770221095788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persistent racial-, ethnic-, and income-related disparities in health outcomes for children suggest that there is still much to do to develop interventions that are responsive to communities’ needs. Cultural health capital, the health-related attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors needed to engage in a healthy lifestyle, is acquired throughout childhood and informs adult preventive health behaviors (PHBs). However, primary caregivers’ social determinants of health (SDH) dictate the opportunities they have for building children’s cultural health capital. Given that targeted, responsive interventions and policies to promote PHB in young children are needed, the purpose of this study was to explore how caregivers with varying SDH define preventive health and what affects their engagement in PHBs for themselves and their children. Six focus groups with primary caregivers of young children (N = 37, 89% female, mean age = ∼37.9 years old, ∼36% White) were conducted at community organizations. Data were analyzed using a deductive approach, and emergent themes were categorized by types of SDH (downstream, upstream, or both) within each focus group. Focus groups were categorized into three clusters based on participants’ SDH and access to resources: high-resource, low-income/moderate-resource, and low-income/low-resource. Caregivers’ definitions of preventive health were rooted in upstream and downstream determinants and differed by cluster. All clusters identified money and access to resources as barriers to engaging in PHBs and acknowledged that structural inequity impacted access to resources. Policies, programs, and structural change to address systemic barriers and mistrust in systems are vital to reduce disparities in health outcomes for children.","PeriodicalId":73906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention and health promotion","volume":"17 1","pages":"300 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention and health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770221095788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent racial-, ethnic-, and income-related disparities in health outcomes for children suggest that there is still much to do to develop interventions that are responsive to communities’ needs. Cultural health capital, the health-related attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors needed to engage in a healthy lifestyle, is acquired throughout childhood and informs adult preventive health behaviors (PHBs). However, primary caregivers’ social determinants of health (SDH) dictate the opportunities they have for building children’s cultural health capital. Given that targeted, responsive interventions and policies to promote PHB in young children are needed, the purpose of this study was to explore how caregivers with varying SDH define preventive health and what affects their engagement in PHBs for themselves and their children. Six focus groups with primary caregivers of young children (N = 37, 89% female, mean age = ∼37.9 years old, ∼36% White) were conducted at community organizations. Data were analyzed using a deductive approach, and emergent themes were categorized by types of SDH (downstream, upstream, or both) within each focus group. Focus groups were categorized into three clusters based on participants’ SDH and access to resources: high-resource, low-income/moderate-resource, and low-income/low-resource. Caregivers’ definitions of preventive health were rooted in upstream and downstream determinants and differed by cluster. All clusters identified money and access to resources as barriers to engaging in PHBs and acknowledged that structural inequity impacted access to resources. Policies, programs, and structural change to address systemic barriers and mistrust in systems are vital to reduce disparities in health outcomes for children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这只是对我们不利的事实:健康的社会决定因素在幼儿照顾者的预防性健康行为中的作用
儿童健康结果中与种族、族裔和收入有关的持续差异表明,在制定符合社区需求的干预措施方面仍有许多工作要做。文化健康资本,即参与健康生活方式所需的与健康有关的态度、信仰和行为,是在整个童年时期获得的,并影响成人的预防性健康行为。然而,初级照顾者的健康社会决定因素决定了他们有机会建立儿童的文化健康资本。鉴于需要有针对性的、响应性的干预措施和政策来促进幼儿PHB,本研究的目的是探讨具有不同SDH的照顾者如何定义预防性健康,以及影响他们为自己和孩子参与PHB的因素。在社区组织中进行了6个主要照顾幼儿的焦点小组(N = 37, 89%为女性,平均年龄= ~ 37.9岁,~ 36%为白人)。使用演绎方法分析数据,并根据每个焦点组的SDH类型(下游,上游或两者)对紧急主题进行分类。根据参与者的SDH和资源获取情况,将焦点小组分为高资源组、低收入/中等资源组和低收入/低资源组。护理人员对预防性健康的定义植根于上游和下游决定因素,并因集群而异。所有集群都将资金和资源获取视为参与phb的障碍,并承认结构性不平等影响了资源获取。解决系统障碍和不信任的政策、规划和结构变革对于减少儿童健康结果的差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disaggregating Data Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts among Post-9/11 Asian American and Pacific Islander Veterans “Scars on Your Heart and PTSD in Your Mind”: Transmisogynoir and the Well-Being of Black Transgender Women in Los Angeles Feasibility Study of a Mobile Health Parenting Intervention Among Somali/Somali Americans From Refugee Families in the United States Parent-Based Prevention Group to Address Alcohol-Related Sexual Assault Among College Students: A Pilot Study Remembering Steven Danish: A Pioneer in Counseling Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1