The movement for global mental health: critical views from South and Southeast Asia

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2021.2007755
Arnav Sethi
{"title":"The movement for global mental health: critical views from South and Southeast Asia","authors":"Arnav Sethi","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2021.2007755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critiques of psychiatric knowledge and practise have raised several concerns relating to: identification of diagnostic criteria, classification of distinct clinical entities, holistic understandings of causation, ‘legitimate’ treatment modalities, and claims to a universal symptomatology and nosology. This timely volume contributes to these longstanding debates and reminds us about all that is at stake if ‘mainstream’ psychiatric treatment and services are ‘universalised’, or perhaps more appropriately, ‘globalised’. As the contributors, including anthropologists, sociologists, public health professionals, historians, and clinical psychiatrists point out, this is indeed the primary aim of the Movement for Global Mental Health (MGMH). The book is divided into four broad themes: Critical Histories, Limits of Global Mental Health, Alternatives and Afterwords. The conceptually rich introduction covers good ground as it defamiliarises taken for granted assumptions about mental disorders that the MGMH tends to accept uncritically. Each chapter addresses certain problematic assumptions about causation, treatment and pervasiveness of mental disorders.","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"348 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.2007755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Critiques of psychiatric knowledge and practise have raised several concerns relating to: identification of diagnostic criteria, classification of distinct clinical entities, holistic understandings of causation, ‘legitimate’ treatment modalities, and claims to a universal symptomatology and nosology. This timely volume contributes to these longstanding debates and reminds us about all that is at stake if ‘mainstream’ psychiatric treatment and services are ‘universalised’, or perhaps more appropriately, ‘globalised’. As the contributors, including anthropologists, sociologists, public health professionals, historians, and clinical psychiatrists point out, this is indeed the primary aim of the Movement for Global Mental Health (MGMH). The book is divided into four broad themes: Critical Histories, Limits of Global Mental Health, Alternatives and Afterwords. The conceptually rich introduction covers good ground as it defamiliarises taken for granted assumptions about mental disorders that the MGMH tends to accept uncritically. Each chapter addresses certain problematic assumptions about causation, treatment and pervasiveness of mental disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球精神卫生运动:来自南亚和东南亚的批评观点
对精神病学知识和实践的批评提出了以下几个问题:诊断标准的确定,不同临床实体的分类,对因果关系的整体理解,“合法”的治疗方式,以及对普遍症状学和分类学的主张。这本及时的书对这些长期的争论做出了贡献,并提醒我们,如果“主流”精神病学治疗和服务“普遍化”,或者更恰当地说,“全球化”,那么一切都将岌岌可危。正如包括人类学家、社会学家、公共卫生专业人员、历史学家和临床精神病学家在内的贡献者所指出的那样,这确实是全球精神卫生运动(MGMH)的主要目标。这本书分为四个广泛的主题:关键的历史,全球心理健康的限制,选择和后记。概念丰富的介绍涵盖了良好的基础,因为它对MGMH倾向于不加批判地接受的关于精神障碍的想当然假设进行了陌生。每一章都阐述了关于精神障碍的因果关系、治疗和普遍性的某些有问题的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
(In) visibility of health and illness: Instagram as an unregulated public health platform. 'We are not done': reclaiming care after mobile health in Burkina Faso. Digital technologies and the future of health: aspirations, care and data. Phantom data and the potentials of radical caretaking in reproductive health. The insensitivity of 'sensitive care': the bureaucracy of pregnancy tissue disposal in England, UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1