Naive portfolios, Brazilian stock funds, and individual investors

IF 1.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion Pub Date : 2017-08-10 DOI:10.1108/ARLA-08-2016-0217
A. Carneiro, R. Leal
{"title":"Naive portfolios, Brazilian stock funds, and individual investors","authors":"A. Carneiro, R. Leal","doi":"10.1108/ARLA-08-2016-0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to contrast three investment choices within the reach of individual investors: naive portfolios of Brazilian stocks; actively managed stock funds; and the Ibovespa index, which represents passive management as well as to offer insights on the performance of professional asset managers in this large emerging market. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nEqually weighted portfolios contained between 5 and 30 stocks to keep transaction costs low. Stock selection used the Ibovespa constituents and considered value (dividend yield (DY) and price-to-book ratio), momentum (past returns), and liquidity, as well as the Sharpe ratio (SR) over the 2003-2012 period, rebalancing three times a year. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nCumulative returns of naive portfolios are large. They frequently outperform the index for all values of n. They also outperform stock funds, particularly when the invested amount exceeds US$25,000, due to transaction costs. Yet, expected out-of-sample SRs corrected for errors in estimates are very low, suggesting that one should not count on this historical performance in the future. Naive portfolios may simply be more exposed to additional value, size, and momentum risks. Results are sensitive to time period selection. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nNaive portfolios may be attractive to individual investors in Brazil relative to stock funds, which seem to strive to keep volatility low and may be better when the investment amount is low. There may be merit for value or momentum stock selection strategies when forming small equally weighted portfolios. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe paper contrasts realistic stock investing alternatives for individuals, it provides a view of stock fund performance in Brazil, and offers practical implications that may be pertinent in other emerging stock markets.","PeriodicalId":45515,"journal":{"name":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-08-2016-0217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contrast three investment choices within the reach of individual investors: naive portfolios of Brazilian stocks; actively managed stock funds; and the Ibovespa index, which represents passive management as well as to offer insights on the performance of professional asset managers in this large emerging market. Design/methodology/approach Equally weighted portfolios contained between 5 and 30 stocks to keep transaction costs low. Stock selection used the Ibovespa constituents and considered value (dividend yield (DY) and price-to-book ratio), momentum (past returns), and liquidity, as well as the Sharpe ratio (SR) over the 2003-2012 period, rebalancing three times a year. Findings Cumulative returns of naive portfolios are large. They frequently outperform the index for all values of n. They also outperform stock funds, particularly when the invested amount exceeds US$25,000, due to transaction costs. Yet, expected out-of-sample SRs corrected for errors in estimates are very low, suggesting that one should not count on this historical performance in the future. Naive portfolios may simply be more exposed to additional value, size, and momentum risks. Results are sensitive to time period selection. Practical implications Naive portfolios may be attractive to individual investors in Brazil relative to stock funds, which seem to strive to keep volatility low and may be better when the investment amount is low. There may be merit for value or momentum stock selection strategies when forming small equally weighted portfolios. Originality/value The paper contrasts realistic stock investing alternatives for individuals, it provides a view of stock fund performance in Brazil, and offers practical implications that may be pertinent in other emerging stock markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼稚的投资组合、巴西股票基金和个人投资者
本文的目的是对比个人投资者的三种投资选择:巴西股票的幼稚投资组合;积极管理股票基金;以及Ibovespa指数,该指数代表被动管理,并提供专业资产管理公司在这个庞大的新兴市场上的表现。设计/方法/方法平均加权的投资组合包含5到30只股票,以保持低交易成本。股票选择使用Ibovespa成分,并考虑了2003-2012年期间的价值(股息收益率(DY)和市净率)、动量(过去回报)和流动性以及夏普比率(SR),每年重新平衡三次。发现单纯型投资组合的累积收益较大。对于所有的n值,它们的表现经常超过指数。它们也优于股票基金,特别是当投资金额超过25,000美元时,由于交易成本。然而,经过估计误差校正的预期样本外SRs非常低,这表明人们不应该在未来指望这一历史表现。幼稚的投资组合可能只是更多地暴露于额外的价值、规模和动量风险。结果对时间段选择很敏感。相对于股票基金,朴素的投资组合可能对巴西的个人投资者更有吸引力,股票基金似乎努力保持低波动性,在投资金额较低时可能更好。当形成小的等加权投资组合时,价值或动量股票选择策略可能有优点。原创性/价值本文对比了个人现实的股票投资选择,提供了巴西股票基金表现的观点,并提供了可能与其他新兴股票市场相关的实际含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The role of dynamic capabilities on the effectiveness of organizational changes in public sector Sustainable strategies and firm performance in manufacturing industry of Coahuila, Mexico Economic-financial performance and value creation in the Brazilian construction industry Firm certification and export performance: the case of the “SME Leader” label Innovation in the tourism sector, organizational learning and performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1