microRNA and Overcoming the Challenges of Their Use in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis

Victoria Turpin, A. Leonova, Sanjay Agarwal, W. Foster
{"title":"microRNA and Overcoming the Challenges of Their Use in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis","authors":"Victoria Turpin, A. Leonova, Sanjay Agarwal, W. Foster","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.91324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endometriosis is a common estrogen dependent and inflammatory disease affecting approximately 176 million women worldwide. Currently, the time between onset of symptoms and a definitive diagnosis has been reported by several international studies to range from 6 to 12 years. Presently, laparoscopic surgery followed by histopathological confirmation of lesions remains the gold standard for diagnosis. In part because of cost and invasiveness, current trends favor reduced laparoscopic surgeries in preference of the non-surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. However, the search for a clinical marker or markers of endometriosis that provide equal or similar sensitivity and specificity to laparoscopy has remained elusive. Thus, the search for a diagnostic test for the diagnosis of endometriosis continues to be a high priority research and clinical issue. Recent studies have reported favorable results with microRNA; however, lack of replication and absence of validation suggest that circulating miRNA may not be reliable for clinical use. Use of different screening platforms together with divergent methods may account for some of the lack or reproducibility in the literature. Herein we critically assess the recent literature and explore sources for discrepant findings. We suggest that prospective studies using validated reference miRNA to normalize results together with improved study design may yet reveal a suitable diagnostic marker or panel of markers for the diagnosis of endometriosis.","PeriodicalId":73732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common estrogen dependent and inflammatory disease affecting approximately 176 million women worldwide. Currently, the time between onset of symptoms and a definitive diagnosis has been reported by several international studies to range from 6 to 12 years. Presently, laparoscopic surgery followed by histopathological confirmation of lesions remains the gold standard for diagnosis. In part because of cost and invasiveness, current trends favor reduced laparoscopic surgeries in preference of the non-surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. However, the search for a clinical marker or markers of endometriosis that provide equal or similar sensitivity and specificity to laparoscopy has remained elusive. Thus, the search for a diagnostic test for the diagnosis of endometriosis continues to be a high priority research and clinical issue. Recent studies have reported favorable results with microRNA; however, lack of replication and absence of validation suggest that circulating miRNA may not be reliable for clinical use. Use of different screening platforms together with divergent methods may account for some of the lack or reproducibility in the literature. Herein we critically assess the recent literature and explore sources for discrepant findings. We suggest that prospective studies using validated reference miRNA to normalize results together with improved study design may yet reveal a suitable diagnostic marker or panel of markers for the diagnosis of endometriosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
microRNA及其在子宫内膜异位症诊断中的应用
子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的雌激素依赖性炎症性疾病,影响全球约1.76亿女性。目前,几项国际研究报告,从出现症状到最终诊断之间的时间为6至12年。目前,腹腔镜手术后的组织病理学确认病变仍然是诊断的金标准。部分由于成本和侵入性,目前的趋势倾向于减少腹腔镜手术,而不是非手术诊断子宫内膜异位症。然而,寻找一种或多种子宫内膜异位症的临床标志物,提供与腹腔镜检查相同或相似的敏感性和特异性,仍然难以捉摸。因此,寻找诊断子宫内膜异位症的诊断测试仍然是一个高度优先的研究和临床问题。最近的研究报道了microRNA的有利结果;然而,缺乏复制和验证表明循环miRNA可能不可靠用于临床。使用不同的筛选平台和不同的方法可以解释文献中的一些缺乏或可重复性。在此,我们批判性地评估了最近的文献,并探讨了差异发现的来源。我们建议,使用经过验证的参考miRNA来标准化结果的前瞻性研究,以及改进的研究设计,可能还会发现一个合适的诊断标记或一组标记物来诊断子宫内膜异位症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adenomyosis Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products and Risk of Endometriosis Benefits of Surgical Intervention in Women with Endometriosis-Related Infertility Adenomyosis and endometriosis Conclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1