Design for safety among design professionals in the Botswana construction industry

Kgosi Rantshilo, K. Agyekum, P. Manu, Abdul–Majeed Mahamadu, C. Cheung, A. Yunusa‐Kaltungo
{"title":"Design for safety among design professionals in the Botswana construction industry","authors":"Kgosi Rantshilo, K. Agyekum, P. Manu, Abdul–Majeed Mahamadu, C. Cheung, A. Yunusa‐Kaltungo","doi":"10.1680/jmapl.22.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design has been identified as a contributor to adverse occupational safety and health (OSH) outcomes in construction. In spite of this, relatively fewer studies have focused on design for safety (DfS) within developing countries; Botswana being a prime example. This research investigates the extent of DfS implementation in Botswana’s construction industry, and the factors that affect its implementation. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among design professionals (i.e., architects and civil/structural engineers) in the Botswana construction industry. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results revealed that a majority of respondents are aware of the concept of DfS and respondents generally consider DfS to be of high importance. Furthermore, there is a high willingness to apply DfS and a high interest in undertaking DfS related professional development training, however, engagement in DfS practices is rather moderate and participation in DfS professional development training is low. Moreover, DfS legislation as well as industry guides are considered by designers to be the most influential factor for DfS implementation in Botswana. From the results, recommendations are given including the inclusion of DfS requirements in OSH legislation and provision of DfS industry guides by the relevant design professional bodies.","PeriodicalId":44163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.22.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Design has been identified as a contributor to adverse occupational safety and health (OSH) outcomes in construction. In spite of this, relatively fewer studies have focused on design for safety (DfS) within developing countries; Botswana being a prime example. This research investigates the extent of DfS implementation in Botswana’s construction industry, and the factors that affect its implementation. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among design professionals (i.e., architects and civil/structural engineers) in the Botswana construction industry. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results revealed that a majority of respondents are aware of the concept of DfS and respondents generally consider DfS to be of high importance. Furthermore, there is a high willingness to apply DfS and a high interest in undertaking DfS related professional development training, however, engagement in DfS practices is rather moderate and participation in DfS professional development training is low. Moreover, DfS legislation as well as industry guides are considered by designers to be the most influential factor for DfS implementation in Botswana. From the results, recommendations are given including the inclusion of DfS requirements in OSH legislation and provision of DfS industry guides by the relevant design professional bodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博茨瓦纳建筑行业设计专业人员的安全设计
设计已被确定为一个贡献者不利的职业安全与健康(OSH)结果在建设。尽管如此,关注发展中国家安全设计(DfS)的研究相对较少;博茨瓦纳就是一个典型的例子。本研究调查了DfS在博茨瓦纳建筑业的实施程度,以及影响其实施的因素。对博茨瓦纳建筑业的设计专业人员(即建筑师和土木/结构工程师)进行了横断面调查。数据分析使用描述性和推断性统计。结果显示,大多数受访者都知道DfS的概念,受访者普遍认为DfS非常重要。此外,他们有很高的意愿应用发展基金,也有很高的兴趣接受发展基金相关的专业发展培训,但参与发展基金实务的程度较低,参与发展基金专业发展培训的程度较低。此外,设计者认为DfS立法和行业指南是DfS在博茨瓦纳实施的最具影响力的因素。根据研究结果,我们提出了建议,包括在职业安全与健康法例中加入DfS要求,以及由相关设计专业团体提供DfS行业指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Construction Industry, An Evaluation of UK Research and Practice – by Andrew Agapiou Construction Law Quarterly The potential for construction statutory adjudication in Pakistan: drawing conclusions from the United Kingdom’s system Application of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for construction safety research Construction Law Quarterly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1