Teacher’ Guideline in Designing English Materials in Curriculum 2013

S. Edy, Uci Sherly Rimadanti
{"title":"Teacher’ Guideline in Designing English Materials in Curriculum 2013","authors":"S. Edy, Uci Sherly Rimadanti","doi":"10.29240/EF.V2I1.421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this research were knowing the guidelines used by the teachers and describing how the teachers implemented the guidelines in designing English materials in curriculum 2013. The researcher chose descriptive study as the kind of research and presented the results in qualitative way. There were five teachers from some Senior High Schools who had participated as the subjects of the research. The researcher used document analysis and interview to collect the data. Document analysis was used to know what the guidelines used by the teachers in designing English materials were. Then, interview was used to collect the detailed qualitative data expressed in the respondents’ own words in order to describe the implementation of guidelines by the teachers in designing English materials. The results of this research, based on Howard and Major’s theory, showed that the teachers used thirteen guidelines and did not use three guidelines in designing English materials. Next, the teachers implemented the guidelines by using syllabus as a guidance, and the materials were designed based on students’ experiences, realities and ages. Based on the results of this research, the researcher suggested the teachers to pay more attention to the guidelines provided, because it is important to make the materials which you designed suitable with the standards in syllabus and students’ needs.","PeriodicalId":33323,"journal":{"name":"English Franca Academic Journal of English Language and Education","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Franca Academic Journal of English Language and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/EF.V2I1.421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this research were knowing the guidelines used by the teachers and describing how the teachers implemented the guidelines in designing English materials in curriculum 2013. The researcher chose descriptive study as the kind of research and presented the results in qualitative way. There were five teachers from some Senior High Schools who had participated as the subjects of the research. The researcher used document analysis and interview to collect the data. Document analysis was used to know what the guidelines used by the teachers in designing English materials were. Then, interview was used to collect the detailed qualitative data expressed in the respondents’ own words in order to describe the implementation of guidelines by the teachers in designing English materials. The results of this research, based on Howard and Major’s theory, showed that the teachers used thirteen guidelines and did not use three guidelines in designing English materials. Next, the teachers implemented the guidelines by using syllabus as a guidance, and the materials were designed based on students’ experiences, realities and ages. Based on the results of this research, the researcher suggested the teachers to pay more attention to the guidelines provided, because it is important to make the materials which you designed suitable with the standards in syllabus and students’ needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语课程教材设计教师指南2013
本研究的目的是了解教师使用的指导方针,并描述教师如何在设计2013年课程英语材料时实施这些指导方针。研究者选择描述性研究作为研究的类型,并以定性的方式呈现结果。有来自一些高中的5名教师作为研究对象参与了研究。研究者采用文献分析法和访谈法收集数据。采用文献分析法了解教师在设计英语教材时所采用的指导方针。然后,采用访谈法,收集被调查者用自己的语言表达的详细的定性数据,以描述教师在设计英语教材时对指导方针的执行情况。根据Howard和Major的理论,本研究的结果表明,教师在设计英语教材时使用了13条指导方针,而没有使用3条指导方针。其次,教师以教学大纲为指导实施指导方针,根据学生的经验、实际和年龄设计教材。根据这次研究的结果,研究者建议教师们要更加注意提供的指导方针,因为让你设计的材料符合教学大纲的标准和学生的需求是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) by Smartphones to Increase English Proficiency of Papuan EFL Students Exploring Vocational High School EFL Teacher’s Understanding of Student-Centered Learning Assessment The Implementation of Project Based Learning in Blended Learning System to Improve English Speaking Skill of Polytechnic Students Sharpen Listening Skills Through Innovative Probing-Promting Application of Cake in Limited Face-to-Face Learning in the Era of Independent Learning The Use of Google Translate in EFL Essay Writing: Is It a Cheating?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1