A retrospective study on pemetrexed induced nephrotoxicity in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients

Sharat Venkat Reddy Kallem, P. Harichandana, C. Bhavya, N. K. Thota
{"title":"A retrospective study on pemetrexed induced nephrotoxicity in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients","authors":"Sharat Venkat Reddy Kallem, P. Harichandana, C. Bhavya, N. K. Thota","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20211019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pemetrexed (PEM) is a new-generation multitargeted antifolate agent that has been shown to have broadspectrum efficacy in a variety of human cancers, including NSCLC and mesothelioma. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicities are among the most serious side effects. PEM nephrotoxicity is well-known, but its occurrence is thought to be rare. Aim was to determine nephrotoxicity induced due to pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Methods: In patients with the NSCLC, we record a retrospective review on PEMinduced renal toxicity. A total of 327 NSCLC patients were treated in our hospital between 2012 and 2019. Of these, 134 patients were diagnosed with 2 or more chemotherapy cycles. 60 of these patients have been diagnosed with combination of antineoplastic drugs based on pemetrexed and platinum. Others were removed from the study and were also required to be tested for other potential causes of renal injury. Results: Suitable statistical tools were used and data was analysed which showed that repeated chemo cycles of pemetrexed leads to the reversible acute kidney injury. With the results from our study we can understand the severity of nephrotoxicity induced with pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Most of the patients were in the first and second stages of nephrotoxicity and most of them were male. Majority of the patients were also above 40 years of age and also endured more than 4 chemo cycles. Conclusions: It shows that PEM allows longer survival, but acute or chronic kidney failure is the price for this achievement. In conclusion, renal toxicity should be controlled routinely in patients treated with pemetrexed. Before each cycle of pemetrexed, creatinine clearance should be measured. Patients need to be well hydrated during treatment. The patient should also be tested for concomitant medications, and any nephrotoxic symptoms should be reviewed and those drugs removed.","PeriodicalId":13898,"journal":{"name":"International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology","volume":"133 1","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20211019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pemetrexed (PEM) is a new-generation multitargeted antifolate agent that has been shown to have broadspectrum efficacy in a variety of human cancers, including NSCLC and mesothelioma. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicities are among the most serious side effects. PEM nephrotoxicity is well-known, but its occurrence is thought to be rare. Aim was to determine nephrotoxicity induced due to pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Methods: In patients with the NSCLC, we record a retrospective review on PEMinduced renal toxicity. A total of 327 NSCLC patients were treated in our hospital between 2012 and 2019. Of these, 134 patients were diagnosed with 2 or more chemotherapy cycles. 60 of these patients have been diagnosed with combination of antineoplastic drugs based on pemetrexed and platinum. Others were removed from the study and were also required to be tested for other potential causes of renal injury. Results: Suitable statistical tools were used and data was analysed which showed that repeated chemo cycles of pemetrexed leads to the reversible acute kidney injury. With the results from our study we can understand the severity of nephrotoxicity induced with pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Most of the patients were in the first and second stages of nephrotoxicity and most of them were male. Majority of the patients were also above 40 years of age and also endured more than 4 chemo cycles. Conclusions: It shows that PEM allows longer survival, but acute or chronic kidney failure is the price for this achievement. In conclusion, renal toxicity should be controlled routinely in patients treated with pemetrexed. Before each cycle of pemetrexed, creatinine clearance should be measured. Patients need to be well hydrated during treatment. The patient should also be tested for concomitant medications, and any nephrotoxic symptoms should be reviewed and those drugs removed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培美曲塞致非小细胞肺癌肾毒性的回顾性研究
背景:培美曲塞(PEM)是一种新一代多靶向抗叶酸药物,已被证明对多种人类癌症具有广谱疗效,包括NSCLC和间皮瘤。剂量限制性血液学毒性是最严重的副作用之一。PEM肾毒性是众所周知的,但它的发生被认为是罕见的。目的探讨培美曲塞对非小细胞肺癌患者的肾毒性。方法:在非小细胞肺癌患者中,我们记录了对pemen引起的肾毒性的回顾性回顾。2012 - 2019年,我院共收治NSCLC患者327例。其中,134名患者被诊断为2个或更多的化疗周期。这些患者中有60人被诊断为基于培美曲塞和铂的联合抗肿瘤药物。其他人则被排除在研究之外,并被要求接受其他潜在肾损伤原因的检测。结果:采用合适的统计学方法,对数据进行分析,发现培美曲塞重复化疗周期可导致可逆性急性肾损伤。根据我们的研究结果,我们可以了解培美曲塞对非小细胞肺癌患者肾毒性的严重程度。患者多为一、二期肾毒性,以男性居多。大多数患者年龄在40岁以上,化疗周期也在4个以上。结论:这表明PEM可以延长生存期,但急性或慢性肾衰竭是这一成就的代价。总之,培美曲塞治疗的患者应常规控制肾毒性。在培美曲塞的每个周期前,应测量肌酐清除率。患者在治疗过程中需要充足的水分。还应检查患者是否同时服用药物,检查任何肾毒性症状并停用药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of KaraShieldTM properties in supporting the immune health of healthy subjects: a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study Knowledge attitude and practices of drug promotional literature: a clinician’s perspective Evaluation of β-blockers dosage regimen rationality in heart failure patients Perceptions of undergraduate medical students of old traditional and new CBME curriculum about pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions reporting at a tertiary care teaching hospital: a comparative study Comparison of efficacy of azilsartan with olmesartan in patients of hypertension: randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1