An Apparent Lack in Level of Basic Knowledge of Caesarean Section Delivery among Egyptian Females: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey

R. Al-Rifai, F. Aziz
{"title":"An Apparent Lack in Level of Basic Knowledge of Caesarean Section Delivery among Egyptian Females: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey","authors":"R. Al-Rifai, F. Aziz","doi":"10.4172/2161-0932.1000463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To investigate the level of basic knowledge pertaining to cesarean section (CS) delivery and identified factors associated with having an “inadequate basic knowledge” of CS delivery among Egyptian females.Design: Population-based cross-sectional study.Population: Egyptian females aged 15-49 years who responded “yes” to the question “have you ever heard of the practice “caesarean delivery”?”Methods: Five statements of the basic knowledge pertaining to CS delivery that surveyed in the Egyptian Health Issues Survey 2015 (EHIS-2015) were utilized. The basic knowledge pertaining to CS delivery was dichotomized into “inadequate” or “adequate” level.Main outcome measure: Inadequate basic knowledge of CS that defined as scoring a total correct score of ≤ 2 out of a maximum potential score of 5.Results: Of the 9,209 females, 6,063 ever-married females were included with a mean age of 32.95 ± standard deviation (SD) 8.35 years. The mean lifetime parity was 2.85 ± SD 1.69 children. Over a half (53.4%) of females had an inadequate basic knowledge of CS. The inadequate knowledge of CS was concentrated among females who aged ≤ 20 years (56.2%) or >35 years (55.5%), with primary education or below (60.6%), living in rural areas (55.7%), “not at all” were reading newspapers or magazines (54.2%) on a weekly basis, nulliparous females (67.7%), and females with ≥ 3 children (54.4%). After adjusting for potential confounders, females who were “not at all” reading newspapers or magazines on weekly basis, experienced vaginal delivery only (aOR: 2.80, 95% CI, 2.13-3.67), or nulliparous females (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI, 1.79-2.30), were more likely to have the inadequate knowledge of CS.Conclusions: Basic knowledge pertaining to CS delivery among Egyptian females is low. Robust national level programs to promote knowledge on different modes of birth delivery are warranted, particularly in socially deprived populations.","PeriodicalId":22164,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","volume":"152 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the level of basic knowledge pertaining to cesarean section (CS) delivery and identified factors associated with having an “inadequate basic knowledge” of CS delivery among Egyptian females.Design: Population-based cross-sectional study.Population: Egyptian females aged 15-49 years who responded “yes” to the question “have you ever heard of the practice “caesarean delivery”?”Methods: Five statements of the basic knowledge pertaining to CS delivery that surveyed in the Egyptian Health Issues Survey 2015 (EHIS-2015) were utilized. The basic knowledge pertaining to CS delivery was dichotomized into “inadequate” or “adequate” level.Main outcome measure: Inadequate basic knowledge of CS that defined as scoring a total correct score of ≤ 2 out of a maximum potential score of 5.Results: Of the 9,209 females, 6,063 ever-married females were included with a mean age of 32.95 ± standard deviation (SD) 8.35 years. The mean lifetime parity was 2.85 ± SD 1.69 children. Over a half (53.4%) of females had an inadequate basic knowledge of CS. The inadequate knowledge of CS was concentrated among females who aged ≤ 20 years (56.2%) or >35 years (55.5%), with primary education or below (60.6%), living in rural areas (55.7%), “not at all” were reading newspapers or magazines (54.2%) on a weekly basis, nulliparous females (67.7%), and females with ≥ 3 children (54.4%). After adjusting for potential confounders, females who were “not at all” reading newspapers or magazines on weekly basis, experienced vaginal delivery only (aOR: 2.80, 95% CI, 2.13-3.67), or nulliparous females (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI, 1.79-2.30), were more likely to have the inadequate knowledge of CS.Conclusions: Basic knowledge pertaining to CS delivery among Egyptian females is low. Robust national level programs to promote knowledge on different modes of birth delivery are warranted, particularly in socially deprived populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及女性剖宫产基本知识水平明显缺乏:一项基于人群的横断面调查
目的:调查埃及女性剖宫产(CS)分娩的基本知识水平,并确定与CS分娩“基础知识不足”相关的因素。设计:基于人群的横断面研究。人口:年龄在15-49岁之间的埃及女性,对“你听说过剖腹产吗?”的问题回答“是”。方法:利用2015年埃及健康问题调查(eis -2015)中关于CS分娩基本知识的5项陈述。有关CS交付的基本知识分为“不足”和“足够”两类。主要结局指标:CS基础知识不足,定义为总正确得分≤2分(最大潜在得分为5分)。结果:9209例女性中,已婚女性6063例,平均年龄32.95±标准差(SD) 8.35岁。平均一生产次为2.85±1.69个孩子。超过一半(53.4%)的女性对计算机科学的基础知识不足。CS知识不足的人群主要集中在年龄≤20岁(56.2%)或>35岁(55.5%)、小学及以下文化程度(60.6%)、居住在农村(55.7%)、“完全不”每周阅读报纸或杂志(54.2%)、未生育女性(67.7%)和有3个以上子女的女性(54.4%)。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,“根本不”每周阅读报纸或杂志、仅阴道分娩的女性(aOR: 2.80, 95% CI, 2.13-3.67)或未分娩的女性(aOR: 2.03, 95% CI, 1.79-2.30)更有可能对CS知识不足。结论:埃及女性CS分娩的基本知识较低。有必要制定强有力的国家一级规划,促进对不同分娩方式的了解,特别是在社会贫困人口中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological Status of Clinical Laboratory Staff During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Exhibitors to Bleeding Disorders in the Context of Pre-Eclampsia: Analytical Preliminary Study About 50 Cases at Laquintinie Hospital (Douala, Cameroon) Congenital lobar emphysema. Fibromuscular dysplasia. Package.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1